Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Science: On second thought, no, secondhand smoke won’t kill you
Hotair.com ^ | 12/19/2013 | Mary Katherine Ham

Posted on 12/20/2013 8:27:07 AM PST by rktman

Now it can be told. Now that smoking has been banned everywhere but the dryer vent at your apartment based on the notion that secondhand smoke kills everyone around you, The Journal of the National Cancer Institute can tell us this via Jacob Sullum:

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acs; nannies; smokenazis; smoking; smokingiscool; tobacco; wellduh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
Never thought about turning on the dryer and exhaling in to a cut out in the vent pipe to maybe keep your apartment/condo neighbors from calling the tar and nicotine cops on you. Kind of depends on where the vent stack goes. How did we think that smoking in the boys room wouldn't be noticed? LOL!
1 posted on 12/20/2013 8:27:07 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

The problem is, politics and lawsuits always trump science and facts.


2 posted on 12/20/2013 8:29:31 AM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Merry Christmas to all my fellow Americans. "Whatever" to everybody else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Embrace the suck.


3 posted on 12/20/2013 8:30:52 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I'll just prop my feet up here on the desk and fire up a cigarette while I look at a tobacco plant that is growing WAY out of season.

Don't like 2nd hand smoke? Stay outta my house.

/johnny

4 posted on 12/20/2013 8:31:16 AM PST by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Aw come on, it’s proven science that simply SEEING someone with a cigarette can take 20 years off your expected life span.


5 posted on 12/20/2013 8:31:50 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As a non-smoker I must admit that I do enjoy not smelling smoke in restaurants and other places. I also hate the smell of it in people’s clothes. However I have never been in favor of not allowing smoking in bars. If it bothers you stay out of them.


6 posted on 12/20/2013 8:33:09 AM PST by Venturer (Half Staff the Flag of the US for Terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Read what it says, not what you think it says:

“this analysis doesn’t tell us what the risk is, or even if there is a risk.”


7 posted on 12/20/2013 8:33:27 AM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

.


8 posted on 12/20/2013 8:34:05 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric Blair 2084

Ping


9 posted on 12/20/2013 8:34:26 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Dang. Forgot all about the anxiety factor and the ravages of the fear of seeing the image of a cigarette. Couple that with a picture of an AR and your just about done. LOL!


10 posted on 12/20/2013 8:34:35 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Back in the 1980s or 1970s when so many people smoked, and legal to smoke inside, it was hard to notice in smell,

but without those its easy to smell smoke even on clothes now.


11 posted on 12/20/2013 8:35:14 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

My understanding, regarding secondhand smoke, is that they definitively know that it is harmful to cats, but that is it.


12 posted on 12/20/2013 8:36:23 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

I knew they were lying about it - but then it was “settled science” doncha know.


13 posted on 12/20/2013 8:36:35 AM PST by Fido969 (What's sad is most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

That must be the impetus behind banning the e-cigarette.


14 posted on 12/20/2013 8:37:15 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

And, shouldn’t it be the business owner who decides to allow or disallow the activity? I seem to remember some posit that there was a 3rd hand smoke issue. Would that be the odor that one smells? Possibly just smelling the odor is hazardous even with no 2nd hand smoke present? I don’t know.


15 posted on 12/20/2013 8:37:41 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Recently ran across denunciations of "third-hand smoke." This is an environment where people have been smoking and tobacco constituents have settled out onto surfaces. The primary symptom of which is the tobacco smoke odor lingers.

Claims are made that it will be deadly, primarily to children.

The kicker that there is absolutely no evidence to this effect is that the articles call for studies to prove the effect.

Anybody who knows the subject is aware that there is, contrary to popular opinion, absolutely nothing uniquely hazardous or toxic about tobacco smoke. It's really remarkably similar to smoke from burning any other plant. Inhale campfire smoke in the same quantities and you'll develop similar symptoms.

It's just that no other plant has ever succeeded in inducing large numbers of people to inhale its smoke at anything close to the dosages tobacco has. Even MJ users seldom smoke anything like the quantities a heavy cigarette smoker will.

16 posted on 12/20/2013 8:38:15 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

If second had smoke was your only exposure it might be defensible but there is car exhaust, food, life in general and I have never believed you can pinpoint a specific thing.


17 posted on 12/20/2013 8:38:41 AM PST by edcoil (System now set up not to allow some to win but for no one to lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JRandomFreeper
In front of my car on my fall commute:

You can roll your own cigars from what falls off these things. Seriously.

18 posted on 12/20/2013 8:39:45 AM PST by cuban leaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrB
That must be the impetus behind banning the e-cigarette.

Actually, it is. They know that e-cigs are perfectly safe, but they claim that the mere appearance gives the "wrong impression".

19 posted on 12/20/2013 8:39:49 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Next they are going to discover that guns don’t kill people all by themselves. This science stuff is good stuff.


20 posted on 12/20/2013 8:40:14 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (Liberals can afford for things to go well, to work, for folks to be happy. They'd be out of work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson