Posted on 12/25/2013 6:33:06 AM PST by Kaslin
If you saw a fat man in a sleigh distributing presents this week, he was in violation of several government regulations.
The Federal Aviation Administration has complaints about his secret flight path. The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources might shoot his unauthorized reindeer the way they shot a baby deer named Giggles at an animal shelter this year. His bag of gifts definitely violates numerous charity tax rules.
In real life, government barely lets people give each other rides in cars. But now the Internet has given birth to some exciting new businesses that challenge this conceit.
Companies called Lyft, Uber and Sidecar offer a phone app that allows people who need a ride somewhere to connect to a driver nearby who'd like to make a few extra bucks. It's like creating an instant taxi business -- which is why it makes existing taxi businesses nervous.
I became a Lyft driver. Once I passed a criminal background check and got my Lyft driver app, I pressed a button on my phone saying I was "available." I quickly got a message from someone nearby who wanted a ride.
My passenger was easy to find -- my phone gave me directions. He wanted to go to a grocery store. After I dropped him off, I told my phone app I was "available" again. No cash changed hands. My passenger's phone suggested he give me a credit card "donation" based on time and distance. He could have stiffed me, but if he did, it would appear on his Lyft "rating," and he'd have trouble getting another ride.
My next passenger was a woman. Why would she feel safe getting into a stranger's car? Again, the rating system protects both her and me. Her phone showed her my picture and ratings from other passengers (with me, she took a chance, as I was a new driver).
Because of the ratings, both passengers and drivers have an incentive to behave well. The higher your rating, the easier it is to get or give rides. In the end, I made money, and my passengers saved money (Lyft rides are about 20 percent cheaper than taxis). Win-win!
But regulators and taxi companies don't see it that way.
Taxi companies aren't happy about losing business to people like me, driving my own car. One cabbie complained, "We have to pay big money for licenses, get fingerprinted, have commercial insurance. (Lyft) has nothing! Sidecar has nothing!"
But it's not "nothing." I had to have a driver's license, a state-inspected car and there was that background check. But more useful than all that: the ratings. This instant feedback gives drivers and customers more reliable information than piles of licensing paperwork spewed out by regulatory agencies.
Do you pick a contractor or dentist after examining their licenses? No, you consult friends or websites like Yelp to determine the sellers' reputation. Feedback from customers is more useful than any bureaucrat's stamp of approval. Internet apps like Lyft's make this feedback ever better.
Will government crush innovations like Lyft? Maybe. Seattle moved to limit it. Nashville declared it illegal to charge anything less than $45 for rides, so there's no way for a company like Lyft to compete by undercutting regular cabs' prices.
Regulators want their fingers in everything. A new idea gives them an excuse to draw attention to themselves as "consumer protectors." In addition, existing taxi companies request regulation. They want politicians to regulate new competition out of existence.
Luckily, technology and capitalist innovation sometimes move faster than the lazy dinosaur that is government. Lyft, Uber and Sidecar have quickly become popular, and this may help them avoid being crushed. By contrast, politicians don't hesitate to destroy things that people think of as weird or dangerous.
Ride-share companies, perhaps sensing that it's better to ask for forgiveness than permission, offered rides without first seeking approval from every regulator. Now they have millions of customers. Politicians often fear regulating things that are widely liked.
Government is as crude and annoying as a speed bump, but individuals looking for better ways to do things keep cruising ahead. Sooner or later, if we restrain the regulators, the market might even produce flying sleighs.
I thought government was all in favor of car pooling.
I dunno. Seems you are opening the door to lawsuits, robbery, and who knows what else. It’s the principle of “No good deed goes unpunished”. I remember a crippled guy who worked at my facility who walked to work, walked into town to get the evening paper, groceries, etc. I was in the habit of giving him a ride whenever I saw him. Never a “Thank you. Can I buy you a beer or anything”. I heard from people that he had said if anyone picks him up and is involved in an accident he’d sue their house right out from under them.
“...Why would she feel safe getting into a stranger’s car?
Again, the rating system protects both her and me...”
-
The robbers, rapists, and murderers are forced to restrain themselves,
or else they will receive bad feedback that would harm their ratings.
Yeah, that’ll work.
This is a neat innovation. And I’ll tell you why the government reallllly hates it...because it’s difficult to tax.
Politicians can't skim anything from carpooling like they can with taxi licenses or hundred million dollar public transport contracts.
MERRY CHRISTMAS ALL! Here is a cute innovation.
“The robbers, rapists, and murderers are forced to restrain themselves, or else they will receive bad feedback that would harm their ratings.”
No. But what will work is the fact that his name, photo and some other personal details will be in the system, available for tracking him down.
Government is in favor of anything if they get their cut....
Ifn’ they dont....watch out!
IIUC, the riders will be vetted the same as the drivers? Otherwise the bad guys could call for a ride and carjack the driver.
Thank you for maintaining this list.
The “robbers, rapists, and murderers” could end up with large holes in their bodies.
I see a potential liability problem.
Auto Insurance companies aren’t going to like covering paid passengers in the event of a Personal Injury accident. If “commercial use” exclusions aren’t already in place as SOP, they will be within a few years. I know I have one on my policy. Calling the payments “donations” is clever, but it’s not going to cut it.
That's what concealed carry is for.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you, RKBA Democrat!
Thanks Albion. A blessed CHRISTmas and Happy New Year to you and yours.
You’re welcome. A blessed CHRISTmas and Happy New Year to you and yours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.