Posted on 12/30/2013 2:57:05 AM PST by Libloather
**SNIP**
But a New York Times report published over the weekend has angered sources who were on the ground that night. Those sources, who continue to face threats of losing their jobs, sharply challenged the Times findings that there was no involvement from Al Qaeda or any other international terror group and that an anti-Islam film played a role in inciting the initial wave of attacks.
It was a coordinated attack. It is completely false to say anything else. It is completely a lie, one witness to the attack told Fox News.
The controversial Times report has stirred a community that normally remains out of sight and wrestles with how to reveal the truth, without revealing classified information.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Looks like Hillary and Bill are up to their old tricks.
The Times should know. They were there in the bathroom. At the time Libya was suffering a toilet paper shortage.
I hope a lot of people start singing like birds all at once and settles this once and for all.
Let me see. Who am I going to believe? Do I believe the special operators on the ground there the night of the attack or the likes of Susan Rice, Hillary, NYT reporters, Obama, and the Demoncrats. For me, this is a no brainer.
The lie concocted by the NYT to aid Hillary is falling apart. How dare they defy Hillary and the NYT?
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise me or Republicanprofessor.
Fast forward, did this paper recently endorse an admitted communist for mayor of New York?
The New York Times is simply a propaganda arm for communists and socialists. It has been so since the 1930's at least. The vast majority of its readers just want to live in the cocoon of their own liberal thoughts. They want their silly ideas reinforced. The Times obliges.
"All the news that's fit to print"? I don't think so. How about: "Read the New York Times, It Beats Thinking".
The Times credibility is Zero.
May the Truth of Benghazi come “out of Egypt” during the Morsi Trials.
Beginning on Jan 8th.
Total Exposure, no matter who is hurt.
—
This is a preemptive attempt to diffuse the information that is and will be coming out. No honest discussion of this can come to any other conclusion. And the pieces to be revealed will fit. Unlike the lies that MSM may try to spin.
Seems to me the media is gearing up to PUSH Hiltery into office, so lets kiss her a$$.....
The New York Times - all the news that’s fit to invent.
This lying story will damage hildebeast and her hubby... the media is exploding over this... the reporter has been on TV three times and has lost all three times. They are now parsing that unless it came directly from bin laden... it is not al qaeda... but that will not fly because al qaeda is now small groups of organized indies who are al qaeda but not part of a centralized core. There will be no president hillary... that dream or nightmare is dead.
THAT is the modern face of the army of satan.
FR posting rules explicitly prohibit profanity.
Is the New York Times doing a Dan Rather?
Didn't think so.
EYE BLEACH!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.