Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Clinton lining her vast pockets with Big Government Nannyisms....remember Ms. Clinton believes in the Third Way as well as being a student of Marxist Saul Alinsky....Hillary would probably put the No. 1 Communist John Podesta as her Attorney General. Ms. Clinton as POTUS is more a nightmare than the Socialist/Marxist in the White House now.

Mr. Podesta joins de facto POTUS Jarrett in advising Barry..........guard your freedoms my friends as the despotic dictates from the White House will be heavy indeed.

1 posted on 01/01/2014 8:42:36 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yoe

Hillary actually criticized politicians who govern by ideology, and push government from crisis to crisis? She actually criticized Obama and Democrats??? I missed that one..........


2 posted on 01/01/2014 8:45:23 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Granted, Hillary of course has ulterior, untrustworthy motives for this but I do hope there are some sort of jobs available for the 1.3 million who are going to lose benefits and other unemployed who will also lose benefits. Hopefully there are jobs out there and they were just passing them up in favor of more dream type jobs. If there are literally no jobs for them, it could be a life or death situation for them.


3 posted on 01/01/2014 8:45:35 AM PST by freedom462
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

BTW, what do posters here generally feel about unemployment benefits? Should it be nonexistent? 6 months tops? A year but only with enough benefits to stay alive, with the condition that they are withdrawn if it is discovered they are not using these benefits for basic room and board purposes only, i.e. for beer, cigarettes, new phones, etc?


4 posted on 01/01/2014 8:47:15 AM PST by freedom462
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Will Huma’s beard, Carlos Danger, be eligible for this extension?


5 posted on 01/01/2014 8:50:28 AM PST by peyton randolph (Tagline copyright in violation of Directive 10-289)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

she criticized lawmakers who govern by ideology

Wait, wouldn’t that be ALL of them?
Ok, for Hillary and some it’s pure greed
but that comes down to an ideology of greed.

I just hope I live long enough to see her eaten
by her own political spawn.


8 posted on 01/01/2014 8:53:24 AM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

For how long? Forever? Hillary, you are dumber than a rock.


9 posted on 01/01/2014 8:53:39 AM PST by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

All the jobs bills Reid is holding up in the Senate, and a has been fired SoS is now making demands?


10 posted on 01/01/2014 8:53:58 AM PST by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Hillary Clinton on Tuesday urged Congress to quickly pass an extension of federal jobless aid.

None of her business. No one elected her to do anything.

(Hillary is sooo old school!)

14 posted on 01/01/2014 9:02:23 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

The long-term unemployed need real jobs, not more welfare and dependency.


15 posted on 01/01/2014 9:03:36 AM PST by Socon-Econ ( is no model of USA-style democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Move along Hillabitch, you no longer an elected or appointed official.


16 posted on 01/01/2014 9:05:06 AM PST by chemicalman (The more support I see,the harder I want to work,and the more determined I am not to let folks down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe
Will hillary clinton push for the truth regarding Benghazi?

I crack me up.

5.56mm

20 posted on 01/01/2014 9:18:50 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

The first step to produce more jobs in this country is a top-to-bottom review of every rule, regulation, job and government organization to see if it’s needed. And not just for some damn show. I mean actual elimination of useless impediments to American business.


24 posted on 01/01/2014 10:02:27 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Excuse me, but why should anyone care what this unelected, overrated, ne’er do well has to say about anything? The article speaks of her as though she’s something more than a mere private citizen - which she isn’t.


25 posted on 01/01/2014 10:11:35 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Are these “working-age” unemployed? If they are “working-age”, then, according to the Democrats, their money is free game.


27 posted on 01/01/2014 10:53:49 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

For some unexplained reason, the American people will do nearly anything Hillary asks.


28 posted on 01/01/2014 11:02:57 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

No standing


31 posted on 01/01/2014 11:10:08 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yoe

Obama and his MSM propagandists have devoted the past few months to hailing what they assure us is a wonderful economic recovery, with falling unemployment numbers, a rising GDP, etc., while suppressing any indications to the contrary.

So why should Hillary be worried about unemployment payments being curtailed when, according to her fellow Democrats, so many new jobs will be opening up to help the unemployed?

In any case, if Hillary were president now and she vetoed the bipartisan budget bill containing the end of unemployment benefits, as she implies she would do, her veto would be overridden because the bipartisan vote was large enough to override a veto.

Why would Democratic voters want to elect a president like Hillary whose views are opposite to those of the majority of Democratic Congressmen and Senators whom they voted to represent them?


32 posted on 01/01/2014 11:15:44 AM PST by Bluestocking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson