Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will 2014 Be the Year of Amnesty? Ominous signals that capitulation is on the horizon.
Frontpage Mag ^ | 01/03/2013 | Arnold Ahlert

Posted on 01/03/2014 7:22:47 AM PST by SeekAndFind

House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) seems determined to undo the political advantage the GOP has gained from the disastrous implementation of ObamaCare. According to the New York Times, Boehner “has signaled he may embrace a series of limited changes to the nation’s immigration laws in the coming months,” bringing up a series of bills to advance that agenda. Apparently Boehner is holding firm to the belief that the need for some kind of “reform” outweighs the risks of alienating his core constituency.

According to the Boehner’s aides, the Speaker is considering a “step by step” process, though they did not identify these steps in specificity. The Times, no doubt in an effort to be “helpful,” suggested that such an agenda might include fast-tracking legalization for agricultural workers, increasing the number of visas for high-tech workers, or embracing citizenship for young illegals whose parents brought them across the border.

Unsurprisingly, gaining control of the border failed to make the list.

Immigration activists were ostensibly buoyed by two recent indications that Boehner is becoming more attuned to their concerns. First, in an effort to push what he called a “common sense” overhaul of the system, Boehner hired Rebecca Tallent. Tallent is a former staffer for Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and former House member James Kolbe, a Republican who represented Arizona’s 8th congressional district. Tallent is a pro-amnesty advocate who has been involved in the creation of broad legalization bills for McCain and Kolbe over the last decade. “Tallent’s hiring suggests [Boehner] really does still want to push an amnesty through the House, which to me suggests that the immigration hawks still have their work cut out for them,” said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies. “She is a professional amnesty advocate.”

Boehner’s aides claim she was brought in to represent his views and not her own. Reform advocates paint a far more realistic picture of the hire, contending that there was no reason to hire Tallent unless Boehner was prepared to address the issue.

Boehner’s aides noted that he remains opposed to the so-called “Gang of Eight”-sponsored Senate bill that sailed through that chamber on a bipartisan vote of 68-32 last June. “The American people are skeptical of big, comprehensive bills, and frankly, they should be,” Mr. Boehner told reporters last month. “The only way to make sure immigration reform works this time is to address these complicated issues one step at a time. I think doing so will give the American people confidence that we’re dealing with these issues in a thoughtful way and a deliberative way.”

However, the coordinated pressure of immigration activists and their allies casts doubt on the possibility of addressing immigration issues in a thoughtful or deliberative way. Activists who participated in acts of civil disobedience late last year to further their agenda are planning new demonstrations for Washington, D.C. and other cities in 2014. Business groups, including tech companies from Silicon Valley and the Chamber of Commerce will be initiating new lobbying campaigns. Faith, immigrant rights, and labor organizations who launched the Fast For Familes campaign late last year have promised to ramp up the pressure as well.

The strategy behind the push is to get the legislative ball rolling in the House sometime in May or June, after Republicans running in 2014 have finished their primary campaigns. After that, the hope is that some sort of bill will reach President Obama’s desk before the 2014 election campaign gets in full gear. “That’s our first window,” said Jim Wallis, the president of Sojourners, a Christian social justice organization in favor of Amnesty. “We are organizing, mobilizing, getting ready here. I do really think that we have a real chance at this in the first half of the year.”

If that strategy fails, activists envision another effort during the lame-duck session of Congress following the election. That would represent their last chance for using parts of the Senate bill as the basis for any compromise, because it expires at the end of this year. Thus, much like 2013, they are emphasizing the urgency of getting something done, sooner rather than later.

In the Times‘ telling of things, some sort of immigration reform is necessary to make the Republican Party palatable for Hispanics, who are “crucial to the party’s fortunes in the 2016 presidential election.” Leaving aside for the moment the absurd notion that anyone on the left, much less the New York Times, has any interest in helping the GOP enhance its fortunes, reality also reveals otherwise. In every presidential election going back to 1980, Hispanics have overwhelmingly favored the Democratic Party by an average margin of 64-31 percent.

That includes the 1988 election when George G.W. Bush beat Democrat contender Michael Dukakis in a 41 state vs. 9 state blow out. Duakais garnered 69 percent of the Hispanic vote to Bush’s 30 percent in the first presidential election following the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act that granted outright amnesty to 2.7 million illegal aliens. Because the two other critical provisions of that bill, namely a crackdown on businesses that hire illegals and enhancing border security, were virtually ignored, America now faces the prospect of more than four times that number of illegals — assuming the much-touted, but unverifiable number of 11 million is accurate – demanding amnesty.

The idea that Hispanics will eventually embrace conservative values is equally absurd. A 2012 survey conducted by the Pew Hispanic Center reveals that while only a 41 percent minority of Americans in general favor bigger government and more social services, a full 75 percent of Hispanics embrace that fundamental pillar of the American left. And while that percentage decreases among Hispanics who have been here longer, it still remains at 58 percent for those who have been here for three generations or more. Assuming current trends continue, Republicans might squeak out a bare majority of the Hispanic vote in time for the presidential election of 2036.

Immigration reform advocates, who endured their last defeat on the issue in 2006, insist the public embraces a different attitude on the subject eight years later. Again, a Pew poll reveals that Americans remain largely wedded to the ideas contained in the 1986 bill, with 85 percent believing employers should have to verify the legality of all new hires, and 68 percent favoring increased security measures and enforcement at U.S. borders. And while 72 percent of Americans support allowing illegals to remain in the country, they do so only after certain requirements, such as paying back taxes, learning English, and passing background checks, are met first. Furthermore, despite that approval, more than half of those polled remain opposed granting citizenship to illegals.

A Gallup poll taken after the 2012 election confirms that opposition. Only 37 percent of Americans favor a pathway to citizenship, and 62 percent want illegal immigration halted completely. Yet the party breakdown of the numbers is far more significant. Forty-nine percent of Democrats favor a pathway to citizenship, compared to only 25 percent of Republicans. Eight-two percent of Republicans want to prioritize stopping the flow of illegals, versus only 48 percent of Democrats.

In other words, unless the first thing out of the legislative box has something to do with stopping the flow of illegals and eschewing anything regarding a pathway to citizenship, Republicans are virtually certain to alienate a substantial portion of their core constituency if they go along with the Left on immigration.

An unnamed top Republican aide contends that won’t happen. “They won’t try to push through something that conservatives can’t live with,” the aide told the Times. Rep. Steve Chabot (R-OH), a member of the Judiciary Committee, reflected the essence of conservative opposition. He characterized a pathway to citizenship as “unfair to the millions of people who are trying to come to this country and follow the rules as they are,” further insisting that Republicans shouldn’t get “stampeded into something that’s not good for the country.” Chabot supports Hispanic outreach. “But I don’t think the immigration bill itself is something that’s going to accomplish that,” he contends.

Roy Beck, CEO and founder of NumbersUSA was blunt regarding the GOP’s motivation for reform, insisting Boehner is beholden to large campaign donors. “He wants it, Number 1, to give the tech contributors what they want on tech visas and, Number 2, to give the ag lobbyists what they want on farmworker visas,” Beck said. “He also is heavily influenced by the Republican National Committee consultants who just want to get the issue off the table.”

Yet the issue is only on the table if Boehner puts it there. Republicans have a party retreat scheduled later this month and immigration reform will undoubtedly come up. They might want to consider two realities as part of the discussion. First, it takes a remarkable level of political tone-deafness to begin dealing with an issue that is not only inimical to the interests of their base, but one that is contentious enough to take the focus off the debacle of ObamaCare wholly owned by Democrats. A party with visions of holding the House and taking the Senate might be wise to remember that one of the primary reasons Mitt Romney lost the 2012 presidential election was because a huge portion of the electorate stayed home, due in large part to their belief that there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between the two political parties. Republicans embracing anything other than a hard stance on reform would exacerbate that reality. If they do, it isn’t hard to envision a low-turnout election that maintains the current status quo.

Second, as long as an Obama administration with a track record of selective and capricious law enforcement capabilities remains in power, who’s to say what part of any new law won’t receive the same treatment? As Breitbart News revealed last October, Shawn Moran, Vice President of the National Border Patrol Council, insisted that Border Patrol agents were being ordered to stand down and allow illegal aliens, human traffickers and drug cartel members, to cross the border. Budget cuts were the ostensible reason for the order, but Moran noted the Border Patrol “has a larger budget than ever,” but it has “not trickled down to the men and women with their boots on the ground.” Obama also unilaterally authorized his own version of the DREAM Act a year earlier.

If that’s still not enough for the GOP, they should consider one more reality. A Gallup poll released last May asked Americans what the most pressing priorities of the nation are. Of the twelve separate categories, reforming immigration finished dead last. Creating jobs and growing the economy finished one and two. In light of a Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) report released last June, predicting the Senate immigration bill would drive down wages and make it harder for Americans to find jobs — not to mention a Heritage Foundation report asserting reform would cost taxpayers $6.3 trillion in new spending on entitlements and social programs over a 50 year period –Republicans might want to reorder their own priorities. A viable opposition party is a terrible thing to waste.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2014; aliens; amnesty; chamberofamnesty; chamberofcommerce; immigration; karlrove; reincepriebus; rnc

1 posted on 01/03/2014 7:22:47 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It looks like its over. We have a rogue government now, absolutely unconstrained by what the American people want with regard to these policies, because they know the corrupt MSM has their back.


2 posted on 01/03/2014 7:26:33 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The corporatists have decreed that there will be open borders.


3 posted on 01/03/2014 7:28:14 AM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The GOPe, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

This time though it will be the final defeat.


4 posted on 01/03/2014 7:28:31 AM PST by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bring back JOBS to America.

We are as a country doing every single thing wrong.

We are sending jobs to Asia, while we need more jobs at home.

We are importing illegals from down south, while we pay unemployment to Americans right here.

Stop it all.

Bring back American jobs now.

Don’t import more illegals. We are 17 trillion dollars in debt already, and that is rapidly increasing.

Americans need jobs.

Now.


5 posted on 01/03/2014 7:29:24 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty, bring him back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

RE: It looks like its over. We have a rogue government now,

Yep. YEsterday the California Supreme Court ruled that an illegal immigrant could practice law in the state.

Which means that eventually, he could become a Supreme Court justice.


6 posted on 01/03/2014 7:30:35 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Washington Mafia controls the country. Henchmen are McCain, Boehner, Cantor, Ryan...

If they push it through they will be remembered for those who destroyed America.

Pray hard. Greed. Blackmail. Miseducation. All reasons they are doing what they are doing.


7 posted on 01/03/2014 7:31:39 AM PST by CincyRichieRich (Pajama-boy-in-chief's beatings continue until morale improves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

RE: Bring back JOBS to America.

Gosh, you must be posting this same mantra in every immigration or economy thread in FR.

The problem, as many people have pointed out is this mantra is meaningless without you telling us HOW it can be done.

Repeating the mantra is as good as chanting HARE KRISHNA.


8 posted on 01/03/2014 7:32:15 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I just don’t understand why the big push for amnesty when actual citizens are having a hard time. If the people want it so bad please move into a neighborhood with them and live there for a few yrs.


9 posted on 01/03/2014 7:32:42 AM PST by moonshinner_09
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Don't give up! Support Boner's primary opponent Eric Gurr.
10 posted on 01/03/2014 7:38:38 AM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Amnesty will guarantee more illegals to hot-foot it here.
It will guarantee a permanent Dem majority.


11 posted on 01/03/2014 7:38:58 AM PST by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ve posted a perfectly good solution.

Import tariffs.

Universal import tariffs. On every good imported into America.

No exceptions. No difference between any imported goods. Food. Oil. Manufactured goods. If it is imported, pay a fee. The only discussion should be, how much?

Remember it is a fee on all imports, so that is a significant, and meaningful discussion.

Use the fee, to pay down that 17 trillion (and increasing) foreign debt.

Now.


12 posted on 01/03/2014 7:38:59 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Phil Robertson of Duck Dynasty, bring him back...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Affirmative.


13 posted on 01/03/2014 7:42:14 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Which means that eventually, he could become a Supreme Court justice.

You don't have to be a lawyer to be a Supreme Court Justice. Just sayin'.

14 posted on 01/03/2014 7:47:59 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

The Dems will push amnesty because they know it’s the perfect wedge issue that could stop the Republicans from benefitting from the Obamacare fiasco. Opposing illegal immigration is an issue which is supported by a clear majority of Americans. It is one of the few areas where conservatives and blue collar Democrats are in substantial agreement and an issue that can even pry black voters away from the Democrats. And it’s the one issue where the mainstream of the Republican party is at odds with the elitist leadership that supports amnesty either from a misguided notion that it will curry favour with Hispanic voters or that it will provide a continued source of cheap labour for corporate America.

If the GOP had unity on this issue the 2014 mid-term elections would make 2010 look like a good day for the Dems. Unfortunately, the amnesty issue will enflame the Republican civil war and may let the Dems snatch victory from the jaws of defeat. The GOP-e does not care about America or about the Republican party - it cares only about pleasing their money masters.


15 posted on 01/03/2014 7:54:21 AM PST by littleharbour ("All men having power ought to be distrusted to a certain degree. ~ James Madison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: moonshinner_09

“I just don’t understand why the big push for amnesty when actual citizens are having a hard time. If the people want it so bad please move into a neighborhood with them and live there for a few yrs.”

Amnesty has nothing to do with the “hard time” citizens are experiencing. The fact is that without mass immigration (legal or otherwise), whole areas would be depopulated and whole school districts would close. The government bureaucracy (in particular, the teachers’ unions) would never allow that to happen. The immigrants aren’t here as workers; they are here as consumers (not just of goods, but of gubmint services). Without them, the poverty and education industries collapse.


16 posted on 01/03/2014 8:01:46 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Ominous signals that capitulation is on the horizon.

That's the typical GOP sunrise. One would think republicans would be used to it by now.
17 posted on 01/03/2014 8:03:55 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (http://jonah2eight.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

“The corporatists have decreed that there will be open borders.”

Not just corporatists, but the “government industry” as well (teachers, social workers, law enforcement, etc.). Too many people get government paychecks administering to these illegals.


18 posted on 01/03/2014 8:03:59 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Menehune56

I might be able to see that if I believed the corporatists were so short sighted, but they must realize that making these folks legal means the democrats will up wages more every year to “make things more fair”. There has to be something more .... doesn’t there?

I’m missing a driver for this and can’t figure out what it is. It isn’t degrees - those are going unemployed or utilized by multinationals overseas, it isn’t manual labor with minimum wage and unemployment rates at current levels, so what?

Those who want to pay less then minimum wage already do, so they don’t care if the employees are illegal. They’re already breaking the law.

So who really gains other than the democrats from a vote standpoint? If the illegals from all countries flow in where is the added cash flow coming from and going to? They aren’t bringing it with them. So is it really just the chamber and corporatists?


19 posted on 01/03/2014 8:12:48 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

That’s a solid thought - but what does the chamber of commerce have to do with those areas of bureaucracy?


20 posted on 01/03/2014 8:15:46 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“The only way to make sure immigration reform works this time is to address these complicated issues one step at a time.

Right, John. Just like you did with the budget, eh?

21 posted on 01/03/2014 8:17:36 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg (Some people meet their heroes. I raised mine. Go Army.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; seeker41; Windflier; Jacquerie; LucyT; null and void; All

The US House of Representatives is analogous to a Police Force - - - they “arrest” the perp by Impeaching the perp.

The US Senate is analogous to a Jury of Peers who have the power to throw the Impeached perp off of the taxpayer gravy train, take away his residence, ban him from building a Library paid for by us, and ban him from using his personal Corporate Jet, Air Force One.

Most RINO Americans want to wait, Wait, WAIT! until they control the House, the Senate and the White House.

To those weak-kneeded summer soldier “patriots” I say “Enjoy the Obamanation that you have tolerated since January, 2009.”

Thus, we Summer Soldier Conservatives continue to tolerate a wimpy, hand-wringing, sobbing crybaby Speaker of the House Boehner as our sorry chief policeman.

“Oh, if only my best friends across the aisle would just play nicey nice - - - “ is the perfect quote that fire-in-the-belly Socialist-Democrats love to hear from their doormat, cowardly, Obamacrat RINOs.

Yes indeed, as long as we WAIT for things to be PERFECT we will never attack those whose goal is to destroy the US Constitution.

Suck it up you sorry House RINOs, and replace John “Benghazi Coverup” Boehner with SC Rep Trey Gowdey, or SC Rep Joe Wilson.

Without a fire-in-the-belly Republican Speaker of the House, Obamacrat RINOs will continue to cave in to “their best friends across the aisle,” to the unbridled glee of every Democrat voter in America!

Pretend that you are fighting to enforce the US Constitution, House RINOs.

Fight or go home, House RINOs.

FIGHT or we will send you home!


22 posted on 01/03/2014 8:28:18 AM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

You assume that they actually care about us, the American People. It’s becoming obvious that they don’t at all.


23 posted on 01/03/2014 8:55:29 AM PST by crusher2013
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Capitulation? Try “collaboration” with the enemy.

Capitulation implies that the pubbies put up a fight.


24 posted on 01/03/2014 9:05:54 AM PST by MortMan ("Choice" is properly exercised the night before, not the morning after.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is an excellent summary of the interests that drive a last priority issue to first priority.

It bears repeating:

1. A SINGLE PIECE OF A STEP-BY-STEP IMMIGRATION REFORM WILL BE GUTTED BY THE US SENATE AND REPLACED WITH THEIR GANG OF 8 SENATE BILL THAT WILL THEN BE RETURNED TO A HOUSE-SENATE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE AND THEN BROUGHT TO A VOTE IN THE HOUSE.

2. THE CONFERENCE COMMITTEE BILL WILL BE PASSED BY ALL DEMOCRATS AND AT LEAST 17 REPUBLICAN ‘SQUISHES’.

The impact will be clear. Millions upon millions of illegals will be granted amnesty and will be illegally registered to vote for the 2014 election.

Citizenship as a requirement for registering to vote will be ignored by those receiving amnesty because it will not be possible to scrub them off the voter rolls before the election because the list of those receiving amnesty will be held back by the Department of State and DHS. The list will be stonewalled until after the election at which time it will no longer matter.

It is impossible to reverse an election result after the election even when it becomes clear that illegal votes were cast because it is impossible to tell which way an illegal registrant voted unless they confess and the confession is accepted by a court of law.

THEREFORE, do not allow ANY immigration reform bill to be even considered until conservatives control the House and Senate.


25 posted on 01/03/2014 9:24:17 AM PST by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

“That’s a solid thought - but what does the chamber of commerce have to do with those areas of bureaucracy?”

Nothing directly; they represent the shops, car dealerships, restaurants, dry cleaners, auto mechanics, lawyers, etc. that the illegals would theoretically patronize.


26 posted on 01/03/2014 9:31:25 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: littleharbour
If the pubbies are viewed as junior partners in the uniparty, it all makes sense. While it is horrible for our republic, the uniparty views unlimited immigration and dilution of American sovereignty as personally good for party members in Washington.

It is borderline silly to think voting for one member of the uniparty or another will stop our slide into tyranny.

27 posted on 01/03/2014 9:39:02 AM PST by Jacquerie (Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

But they still have to have money to patronize are they anticipating that the govt dole will never end? Or just that it won’t end until they’ve gotten theirs? Maybe they are that foolish.


28 posted on 01/03/2014 9:44:45 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothings)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

“But they still have to have money to patronize are they anticipating that the govt dole will never end? Or just that it won’t end until they’ve gotten theirs? Maybe they are that foolish.”

When Nancy Pelosi heralds the benefits that unemployment checks bring to the economy, the whole idea is that while they are funded by the government printing press, they are preventing a large number of businesses from simply folding completely. To keep businesses (and whole states) open (with their emplyees working), they’ll keep printing money.

A very short-sighted strategy, designed for nothing more than getting them through the next election cycle...


29 posted on 01/03/2014 11:30:51 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic war against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Tooth Fairy, Propaganda, Graft & Election Reform - Conservative on Target

http://beforeitsnews.com/opinion-conservative/2013/07/tooth-fairy-propaganda-graft-election-reform-conservative-on-target-2684058.html

Saturday, July 20, 2013

“How many times have we heard “free tuition,” “free health care,” and free you-name-it? If a particular good or service is truly free, we can have as much of it as we want without the sacrifice of other goods or services. Take a “free” library; is it really free? The answer is no. Had the library not been built, that $50 million could have purchased something else. That something else sacrificed is the cost of the library. While users of the library might pay a zero price, zero price and free are not one and the same. So when politicians talk about providing something free, ask them to identify the beneficent Santa Claus or tooth fairy.” - Walter Williams

HOW DEMOCRACIES PERISH, Deathbed Edition:

This is the thirtieth anniversary of the publication of How Democracies Perish, an analysis of the spread of world communism by Jean-François Revel, one of freedom’s most serious French defenders since Tocqueville. At the heart of this work, Revel details “The Tools of Communist Expansion,” among which the most relevant for understanding our current situation comes in Chapter 16, “Ideological Warfare and Disinformation.”

The profound simplicity of Revel’s nuts and bolts account of totalitarianism’s Cold War advance, far from being obsolete, actually sheds light on a defining feature of today’s progressive ascension: the perverting of the free press into a propaganda ministry.

Revel’s trenchancy is proven in the fact that the mechanics of Soviet cultural infiltration he identified may now be seen at work again, this time undermining the West not from without, but from within. The war Revel described thirty years ago has progressed to its natural final stage: the West, having weakened before communist propaganda even as the communist nations themselves were crumbling, has now taken to propagandizing itself into rejecting its victorious heritage in favor of the “ideal” of complete state control. Marxist disinformation is now homegrown…

“Do you wish to know when that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society’s virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by Compulsion — when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors — when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don’t protect you against them, but protect them against you — when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming self-sacrifice — you may know that your society is doomed.

Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.“ – Ayn Rand

The Real Threat from Comprehensive Immigration Reform

Everything the Democrats do is to increase voter participation – participation by kids, felons, old folks, folks in comas, illegal aliens, whatever, just vote Democrat. The integrity of elections is of no concern to them; all they worry about is locking in a permanent majority. And now, with comprehensive immigration reform, they are attempting to import an electorate.

Under Harry Reid, the U.S. Senate is the worst ever. Decent GOP senators shouldn’t vote for anything pushed by Reid and his ilk unless it is exactly right. In other words: without comprehensive election reform, comprehensive immigration reform should be summarily rejected. Unless it can be demonstrated that there will be safeguards that prevent the newly legalized from voting, the Senate immigration bill should die a dog’s death.

Regarding election i0ntegrity, America is a banana republic, and always has been. And there is no excuse for it in this high-tech age. Americans should join together and say to the U.S. Senate: you’re grounded.

“[T]here are, at bottom, basically two ways to order social affairs, Coercively, through the mechanisms of the state — what we can call political society. And voluntarily, through the private interaction of individuals and associations — what we can call civil society. … In a civil society, you make the decision. In a political society, someone else does. … Civil society is based on reason, eloquence, and persuasion, which is to say voluntarism. Political society, on the other hand, is based on force.”
– Edward H. Crane

Source: http://john8322.blogspot.com/2013/06/tooth-fairy-propaganda-graft-election.html


30 posted on 01/03/2014 8:40:33 PM PST by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
There should be import tariffs for certain. But I think it should be proportional to the difference in cost of labor so that cost of the product for the consumer would be the same if it was made here. For example, Japanese workers get paid a little bit less than American workers so the tariff on Japanese goods should be low. Chinese workers get paid far less so the tariff should be high on Red Chinese goods.

We have to be careful though that the tariffs only protect from cheap labor but not from competitive and innovative business practices and processes. Real competition helps everyone, especially the end consumer.

But American companies that outsource and offshore to foreign countries should automatically have punitive and confiscatory tariffs slapped on them.

31 posted on 01/08/2014 7:46:07 AM PST by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2
The USA will be dismantled completely in under 10 years.

Probably under 3.

32 posted on 01/08/2014 7:49:42 AM PST by Lazamataz (Early 2009 to 7/21/2013 - RIP my little girl Cathy. You were the best cat ever. You will be missed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson