Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Few transportation fuels surpass the energy densities of gasoline and diesel
Energy Information Administration ^ | JANUARY 3, 2014 | Energy Information Administration

Posted on 01/03/2014 12:25:45 PM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Steely Tom
What has a higher energy density than diesel? Acetylene?

I think that would be limited to longer chain hydrocarbons. #6 Fuel Oil (bunker fuel) will have a greater energy density.

http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/energy-content-d_868.html

21 posted on 01/03/2014 1:28:15 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 867V309
So why didn’t Saturn V burn liquid oxygen and diesel instead of liquid hydrogen?

Because when it comes to lifting, energy per pound is more important than energy per gallon. Hydrogen one of the best at the first and one of the worst at the second.

22 posted on 01/03/2014 1:30:11 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AdSimp
Trinitrotoluene (TNT) already has the oxygen in the original molecule needed for combustion.

Fuels like diesel, gasoline, hydrogen need to be mixed with air for an oxygen source to take place.

23 posted on 01/03/2014 1:33:38 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Using this as the criteria, diesel would be best.
...............
Someone on one of these forums was telling me that the light sweet crude produced by most shale oil formations in the USA does not produce as nearly as much diesel as the heavy crude from say Venezuela.

Is this true?


24 posted on 01/03/2014 1:37:51 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

OK, thanks.


25 posted on 01/03/2014 1:40:41 PM PST by 867V309 (Obama- he's just crazy enough to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AdSimp

The energy density of gasoline exceeds that of black powder by several orders of magnitude, which is why fuel-air explosives are so devastating. Not sure about HE, though.


26 posted on 01/03/2014 1:41:32 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

The first stage of the Saturn burned kerosene which has a similar energy density. I think the opted for hydrogen on the upper stages to reduce weight and the load on the first stage.


27 posted on 01/03/2014 1:44:39 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: thackney

bookmark


28 posted on 01/03/2014 1:48:07 PM PST by Sergio (An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdSimp

Gasoline can make some pretty impressive booms if you do it right, but I won’t give the details here. You are correct about speed making the difference; high explosives don’t release much energy but they release it all nearly instantaneously.


29 posted on 01/03/2014 1:48:11 PM PST by Squawk 8888 (I'd give up chocolate but I'm no quitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: thackney

U235/U238 makes a pretty dense submarine fuel.


30 posted on 01/03/2014 1:55:15 PM PST by posterchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Someone on one of these forums was telling me that the light sweet crude produced by most shale oil formations in the USA does not produce as nearly as much diesel as the heavy crude from say Venezuela.

Light oil has less BTUs per barrel than heavy oil. But heavy oil takes more energy to refine because more energy is consumed cracking those longer chain hydrocarbons into the more valuable transportation fuels like gasoline and diesel.

The API gravity at 60°F (15.6°C) for No. 2 diesel fuel is between 30 and 42.

http://www.chevronwithtechron.com/products/documents/Diesel_Fuel_Tech_Review.pdf
Page 5

So while very light oil, nearly gas condensate with API gravities in the 40s and above, that should be true, Bakken, West Texas Intermediate, Brent and the like are most valuable because they have the most gasoline/diesel type hydrocarbons.

Long answer to say no, not true.

31 posted on 01/03/2014 1:58:57 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Typical N6 is 149,000-150,000 BTUs/gallon.
Negative gravity slurry oils, some a full pound per gallon heavier, can run 159,000-160,000 BTUs/gallon.
Now, that's heat !
32 posted on 01/03/2014 2:13:07 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

“So why didn’t Saturn V burn liquid oxygen and diesel instead of liquid hydrogen?”

Cause hydrogen go boom?


33 posted on 01/03/2014 2:57:38 PM PST by HenpeckedCon (What pi$$es me off the most is that POS commie will get a State Funeral!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
Gasoline can make some pretty impressive booms if you do it right, but I won’t give the details here.

It certainly makes some pretty impressive noise when it explodes in the cylinders of a Harley.

I'm guessing that being compressed to a few hundred psi before being ignited has something to do with it.

34 posted on 01/03/2014 4:07:28 PM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AdSimp

Fuel/Air Explosive (FAE)

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/fae.htm

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/dumb/faeanim.gif


35 posted on 01/03/2014 4:56:08 PM PST by BwanaNdege (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. J.F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

> other options may have more energy per unit weight, but none have more energy per unit volume.

/bingo

Thanks thackney.


36 posted on 01/04/2014 4:36:21 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson