Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Govt loses bid to conceal documents showing AIDS-Depo Provera link
Life Site News ^ | January 9, 2014 | LISA CORRENTI

Posted on 01/10/2014 2:39:57 PM PST by NYer

WASHINGTON, D.C., January 9, 2014 (C-FAM.org) - Lawyers for U.S. government agencies have failed in an initial attempt to force a watchdog group to remove leaked documents from the group’s website. The documents describe studies showing complications of a long-lasting contraceptive heavily backed by the agencies and the Gates Foundation for use by African women.

The U.S. agencies are accused of attempting to conceal their knowledge of studies showing women using the injectable contraceptive Depo Provera are at higher risk of getting HIV/AIDS.

Allowing The Rebecca Project to publish the information means “this issue of Depo Provera’s harm now has to be decided in a court of law, where a judge will review scientific and social research data,” Kwame Fosu, the group’s policy director, told the Friday Fax.

The US Agency of International Development (USAID) and the Gates Foundation have spent millions of dollars to increase injectable contraceptive use among women in high-HIV communities in sub-Sahara Africa.

Legal representatives for USAID and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) filed a copyright infringement complaint to force The Rebecca Project to remove classified documents from its website. The documents were used at a closed-door meeting in Geneva of the World Health Organization, USAID, CDC, and Gates officials.

The meeting convened shortly after the Lancet Infectious Diseases journal published a study by Dr. Renee Heffron. It indicated women using Depo Provera had an increased risk of contracting HIV/AIDS.

One of the two classified documents posted by Fosu details several studies examining the link between injectable contraceptives and HIV transmission. While 11 of 15 studies reported the same result as Dr. Heffron, the WHO nonetheless issued a “Technical Statement” that the research was “inconclusive.”

Fosu charges the WHO guidelines “provided cover” for USAID, Gates, International Planned Parenthood, Pfizer, and others to continue “as usual” and protect the millions allocated to making Depo available to African women.

Months later Melinda Gates launched a $4 billion partnership, which includes funding to produce and deliver the injectable Depo Provera.

The second classified document obtained by Fosu was authored by Chelsea Polis of USAID and Kathryn Curtis with CDC. It heavily influenced the WHO review staff to determine there was “insufficient reason” to withdraw Depo Provera and enforce mandatory warnings. Fosu claims the Polis and Curtis analysis “water[ed] down available evidence” by ignoring key research.

Despite attempts to conceal the harmful side effects, more poor women are abandoning use of Depo Provera. Compared with other contraceptive methods, women in less developed countries are more likely to stop using Depo Provera within a year of their first dose due to associated side effects and health concerns. A Population Reference Bureau report on worldwide family planning also indicates the injectable contraceptive is not used by women in affluent countries.

Fosu successfully refuted the legal attack to remove the documents citing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) exemption for human rights and educational organizations that are providing information to protect vulnerable populations.

“Considering the overwhelming evidence of Depo Provera’s harm,” said Fosu “it is incumbent on Health Ministers in targeted developing countries to restrict or ban Depo Provera as a family planning option – exactly what Israel did in 2013 to protect women.”

In Ghana, human rights expert Dr. Charlotte Abaka, the former Chair of the UN women’s treaty committee, now advocates ending or restricting Depo Provera.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: abortion; africa; aids; cdc; deathpanels; depoprovera; obamacare; usaid; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2014 2:39:57 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; narses

Ping!


2 posted on 01/10/2014 2:40:17 PM PST by NYer ("The wise man is the one who can save his soul. - St. Nimatullah Al-Hardini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This must be that those women are not afraid of pregnancy so they are engaging in more sex. There doesn’t seem to be an actual cause in having hormones circulating vs HIV getting into the bloodstream.


3 posted on 01/10/2014 2:45:16 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Bill Gates is a eugenist


4 posted on 01/10/2014 2:45:28 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I agree. I think the Depo is not causing more HIV/AIDS. It is misleading, to say the least.


5 posted on 01/10/2014 2:46:42 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I suspect this is a case of "correlation is not causation". The "long lasting contraceptive" is likely increasing the frequency of promiscuous sexual activity and raising the likelihood of infection.
6 posted on 01/10/2014 2:47:10 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Sucks for the Depo people that their brand name was used. This would also apply to any implant. I guess its just way easier to run around shooting people every 3 months over there.


7 posted on 01/10/2014 2:50:15 PM PST by ToastedHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

Or maybe the shots are messing with the immune systems of these women. Or maybe a little of both.


8 posted on 01/10/2014 2:51:06 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Correlation is not causation.

In this case, I would suspect that women who sign up for a multi-year birth control implant are statistically much more likely to do so because of high numbers of sexual partners (read that as prostitutes frequently engaged in high risk behavior with multiple random and diseased partners) and are therefore much more likely to become infected in the course of working their chosen profession.


9 posted on 01/10/2014 2:51:09 PM PST by null and void (It is as if they all had one head. Too bad they don't all have one neck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Yup, probably more sex. With more people.


10 posted on 01/10/2014 2:51:56 PM PST by informavoracious (Root for Obamacare and healthcare.gov failure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Blatant misuse of statistics.
The more women use Depo Provera
the less the fear pregnancy and
the more often they will engage in
unprotected sex. It’s the increase
in THAT number that leads to the
increase in HIV. The drug itself has
NOTHING to do with the increased
infection rate. Pissant shyster
lawyers busy destroying another
drug company for profit and the
blackrobed pirates infesting court
benches are allowing it...since they
are still a member of the “club” of
lawyers. They take care of their own.


11 posted on 01/10/2014 3:04:28 PM PST by nvscanman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Why the focus only on HIV? If promiscuity were the reason for the higher infection rate, one would expect higher infection rates of other STDs as well. If that turns out to be true, promiscuity is probably the reason.
12 posted on 01/10/2014 3:04:51 PM PST by JoeFromSidney (itYe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

Maybe it isn’t Depo-Provera... or ‘just’ Depo-Provera.

Sharpton and Jesse, please pick up the red courtesy phones.


13 posted on 01/10/2014 3:09:55 PM PST by AliVeritas (Pray/Penance. Isa 5:18-21,10:1-3 "Tempus faciendi, Domine, dissipaverunt legem tuam")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
... women ... so they are engaging in more sex.

Interesting asymmetry. Isn't it used for "chemical castration" in males?

14 posted on 01/10/2014 3:12:08 PM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The entire premise of birth control pills and morning after pills is that getting pregnant is worse than contracting an STD.


15 posted on 01/10/2014 3:13:38 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

>>Interesting asymmetry. Isn’t it used for “chemical castration” in males?

Yes, but this is a much smaller use than its use as a long-acting female contraceptive.


16 posted on 01/10/2014 3:14:52 PM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The syringes may themselves be a vector of transmission. Needle-sharing drug users are one of the at-risk populations for HIV/AIDS.


17 posted on 01/10/2014 3:16:32 PM PST by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

correlation is NOT causation


18 posted on 01/10/2014 3:19:37 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; little jeremiah; narses
What the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation wants to do to the women of Africa, Kathleen Sebelius and the HHS want to do to the women of America: push us, all of us in the fertile years --- roughly 12-52 --- into long-acting hormonal-derangement type contraception: not so much pills, but injections, patches, and inserts with timed-release endocrine disruptors.

Don't make the mistake of thinking the damned HHS mandate is all about condoms or even the Pill. By no means. It's about long-term impairment of female physiological function, targeting the whole female population. The marketing push is on.

The aim is to cut the birthrate in OUR country, which is already below replacement. Replacement fertility is 2.11 -- at last calculation, US fertility has dropped to 1.85 since 2008.

Even though they know that chronically jiggering the hormonal level seriously increases infection risk for AIDS and the new, "improved" cephalosporin-resistant gonorrhea.

This is what they call "women's health."

For our daughters and granddaughters!

Unconscionable evil.

19 posted on 01/10/2014 3:23:01 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Ask Mrs. Wizard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

And don’t forget the free surgical sterilization!


20 posted on 01/10/2014 3:33:11 PM PST by Tax-chick (Tell the mad chameleon he's not welcome anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson