Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How I Changed My Mind About Abortion
Patheos ^ | January 15, 2014 | Julia Herrington

Posted on 01/18/2014 3:40:49 PM PST by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: Nifster

Why should the perogative be with the woman?
If both are responsible then both should have
an interest, as it stands now the male only
has an interest if the child is born while
the female may choose to abort or carry
inspite of the wishes of the male.


41 posted on 01/18/2014 11:26:33 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Yep. Saw this years ago....”we had a sexual revolution and the women lost.” The two biggest weapons were abortion/contraception and no-fault divorce. They were sold as empowerment tools to women by the feminists and faux-feminist men. In reality all they did was free men of responsibility.


42 posted on 01/19/2014 2:50:33 AM PST by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: bjorn14

EVERYBODY LOST NOT JUST WOMEN. look at the friggin state we’re all in. diseases, lies, unhappiness, distrust, certainly not love.


43 posted on 01/19/2014 9:04:40 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
I'm sorry to inform you, Ma'am, that you CANNOT abort this child.

It seems you are, somehow, carrying a BALD EAGLE to term - not a human.




I'd like to thank the United States Government for protecting me and my kind.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
You see, 40 years ago, my odds of making it out of the egg, alive, were very poor; about 80% of us died. 
 (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=rachel-carson-silent-spring-1972-ddt-ban-birds-thrive)
 
 
But a lady discovered our plight and wrote a book that addressed our problem,
and, in 1972, a law was ammended protecting us even further. (http://www.fws.gov/midwest/eagle/protect/laws.html)
 
 
 
 
 
 
What I find strange is that the same government passed a law the very next year that allowed for killing
of unborn, and apparently unwanted, humans.  Little ones still nestled safely in their Mother's womb.
Around 25% of them are dying before birth - on average nearly 3,300 - every day of the year.
 
 
I hear that by now, somewhere around 55 MILLION of them have perished.
Wouldn't that kind of mess up the humans plans for growth, and welfare, and
retirement?
 
 
 
 
 
Strange birds; these Homo Sapiens.  Perhaps they'll come to their senses
before they are ALL dead!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

44 posted on 01/19/2014 11:15:37 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

why ask me... I put the responsibility on the man... if he doesn’t want children keep it zipped


45 posted on 01/19/2014 1:29:51 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: tet68

apparently you think once a child is born that BOTH parents aren’t responsible...you are not only legally incorrect you are also morally incorrect...

again I say if you don’t want children keep it zipped. If you want children get married and behave like an adult not like some animal in heat


46 posted on 01/19/2014 1:31:22 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Sorry you misunderstood, I believe both are responsible
and both have rights.
Glad to clear that up for you.


47 posted on 01/19/2014 3:36:00 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
It may not be typical but it is not uncommon. You may be the naïve one if you think abortions are mostly goaded by the men involved. Women typically get abortions for their own reasons, not because a man wants them to, and seldom turn away from the decision to abort just because the man is opposed.

Surveys have shown that among the primary reasons for abortion are problems in the relationship, as identified by the mother.

48 posted on 01/19/2014 9:22:33 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
It may not be typical but it is not uncommon. You may be the naïve one if you think abortions are mostly goaded by the men involved. Women typically get abortions for their own reasons, not because a man wants them to, and seldom turn away from the decision to abort just because the man is opposed.

Surveys have shown that among the primary reasons for abortion are problems in the relationship, as identified by the mother.

49 posted on 01/19/2014 9:22:34 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
It may not be typical but it is not uncommon. You may be the naïve one if you think abortions are mostly goaded by the men involved. Women typically get abortions for their own reasons, not because a man wants them to, and seldom turn away from the decision to abort just because the man is opposed.

Surveys have shown that among the primary reasons for abortion are problems in the relationship, as identified by the mother.

50 posted on 01/19/2014 9:22:35 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
It may not be typical but it is not uncommon. You may be the naïve one if you think abortions are mostly goaded by the men involved. Women typically get abortions for their own reasons, not because a man wants them to, and seldom turn away from the decision to abort just because the man is opposed. And many of them are.

Surveys have shown that among the primary reasons for abortion are problems in the relationship, as identified by the mother.

51 posted on 01/19/2014 9:23:17 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
sorry for the multiple post screw up.
52 posted on 01/19/2014 9:27:56 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“it’s certainly not something you profess publicly.”

This is the product of political “correctness” run amok. We have become a society where far too many people are afraid to speak up because of political and social pressure to conform. Those pressures used to be a force which encouraged people to live by high moral standards. Now they pressure people to give legitimacy and acceptance to things like abortion, which they know in their hearts to be wrong.


53 posted on 01/20/2014 3:52:43 AM PST by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson