The ENTIRE present Populations of the bottom 26 STATES have been KILLED in the womb by their MOTHERS!! 55-56 MILLION is the number.....its SHOCKING when you look at the numbers.....AND the BARBARIANISM!!
When Bret Baier asked him where the abortion debate goes from here, Hume said he looks to science to prove more conclusively that fetuses can feel pain, if possible, from the beginning. That would “change everything,” he concluded.Sorry Brit.
As far as the Culture of Death is concerned, it wouldn't change a thing. 
Britt should have someone in Fox News promote this:
http://3801lancaster.com/watch/
Part II is coming this Spring:
PING
A baby’s heart starts beating 18 days after conception. A baby is fully formed by 12 weeks and spends the next approx. 6 months growing. The culture of death does not care. I think abortion was the first step toward the Soviet style of country........where religion will be required to go underground in favor of worshiping the Government. Progressive? No. Unconscionable? Yes.
Great job Mr.Hume. We all know how true these statements are when Democrats keep voting against pre abortion counseling and sonograms so the mother can see the actual child they plan on aborting.
Just those two small acts would cut the abortion rate to nothing. The only possible reason to not allow these procedures is sanctioned genocide.
I was very suprised to hear such a strong commentary from Brit.
It was followed through later with comments by members of Bret’s panel
The FReeper Foxphobes can no longer can make a valid case in their tirades.
It was Hume’s finest moment!
Does Brit Hume support tea party candidates who would actually work to outlaw abortion? I don’t think so. But, obviously, a good rant.
Well, even according to this paper, much less others cited by pro-life groups, there is clear, undeniable evidence that at least after 26 weeks gestation and probably down to 24, and possibly as low as 18, the baby feels pain.
So we already have such evidence Mr. Hume, but I don't see support for abortion "crumbling" anytime soon.
We truly live in an evil world, and quite frankly an evil country anymore. Where evil is good and good evil. Pray hard, it's our greatest weapon and probably our only one now.
Hume said he looks to science to prove more conclusively that fetuses can feel pain, if possible, from the beginning. That would “change everything,” he concluded.
I guess he means that the pro-life position would have a more compelling psychological appeal, and not that it's OK to kill people who can't feel pain.
!
May God bless the faithful souls who freeze in the January icy weather in D.C. every year to witness to the world that the Supreme Court of the United States of America approved the killing of 55 million people, far more than Stalin and Hitler combined.
When the members of this court, and all who support this murder of God’s children, appear before God, the true Supreme Judge, what excuse will they give? Everyone knows the product of conception is a live human being. Giving it the term “fetus” doesn’t change the sin involved in the murder of the unborn.
In fact there have long been videos of babies, in utero, moving to avoid needles and such.
This 30 minute video titled, 180, illustrates that attitudes about abortion can change.
Pay attention to the warnings as some of the video is quite graphic. Please be patient and let the story build to its objective of changing hearts and minds by appealing to mankind’s better instincts.
I have no problem with declaring abortion to be what it is: murder and infanticide.
One thing that I've never understood about this opinion is the conservative hostility against a right to privacy. Where the hell else does a right to be "secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects" if not from a right to privacy? The Federalists argued against the adoption of the bill of rights because (among other things) they feared that by listing several specific enumerated rights, that others that naturally accrue to you by virtue of your having been born human would be effectively destroyed because "they aren't enumerated". This is the primary driver for the 9th and 10th amendments, which as we've seen from history might as well not exist. It seems their fear was justified.
Of course, the Anti-Federalists were right as well. We've seen what has happened in other english-speaking nations that do not have written constitutions to back up their rights. Does anyone really believe we'd be able to acquire firearms at all if it weren't for the 2nd amendment?
I have no problem whatsoever with a "right to privacy", because the fact of it seems self evident. It is the extension of infantacide to be encompassed by this right that I object to.
But but what did Juan say ?
Brit Hume’s commentary was excellent. I do not consider it a rant. I recommend you listen to it.