Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing Surveillance Plane Found Not Effective for Mission
Seattle Times ^ | Jan 23, 2014 3:16 PM ET | Tony Capaccio

Posted on 01/24/2014 10:03:13 AM PST by maddog55

A new Boeing Co. (BA) surveillance aircraft deployed to Japan last month isn’t yet effective at hunting submarines or performing reconnaissance over large areas -- two of its main missions, the Pentagon’s weapons tester found.

Flaws in the $35 billion program included the plane’s radar performance, sensor integration and data transfer, Michael Gilmore, chief of the Pentagon testing office, wrote in his annual report on major weapons, which has yet to be released. He said the new P-8A Poseidon exhibited “all of the major deficiencies” identified in earlier exercises when subjected to more stressful realistic combat testing from September 2012 to March 2013.

“Many of these deficiencies” led Gilmore to determine that the P-8A “is not effective for the intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance mission and is not effective for wide area anti-submarine search,” he said in a section of the report obtained by Bloomberg News. The Navy plans to conduct additional testing “to verify the correction of some deficiencies,” he wrote.

Gilmore’s conclusions suggest the initial aircraft in the program -- which packs a modified Boeing 737-800 with radar and sensors -- aren’t ready for deployment. Among its primary missions is tracking Chinese submarines. Six of the planes have been deployed to Japan supporting 7th Fleet maritime patrol operations at Naval Air Facility Atsugi as part of the U.S. strategic pivot to the Asia-Pacific region.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Japan; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; miltech; navair; surveillance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: OldMissileer
Yeah. A 737 is perfect for a low and slow long loiter time mission.


Not as low and slow as this.

21 posted on 01/24/2014 5:30:05 PM PST by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Field experience only CONFIRMED the shortcomings found in pre-deployment testing.

“He said the new P-8A Poseidon exhibited “all of the major deficiencies” identified in earlier exercises when subjected to more stressful realistic combat testing from September 2012 to March 2013.”

They already KNEW this platform is deficient. Shouldn’t somebody go to Leavenworth for a very long visit and take their pocket politician with them?

What good does it do to say anything. Only the people in the right and exposing these crimes are persecuted. Nobody is prosecuted.

$35 Billion for a POS system and the SOBs cut $600 Million from established veterans programs. Prove somebody’s palms aren’t being greased.


22 posted on 01/25/2014 11:45:36 AM PST by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

Nobody goes to jail in these defense programs, they get promoted. This aircraft has had major problems since it’s inception, failed miserably throughout testing and when requirements can’t be met, they just drop the requirement. End result as you state is a POS aircraft that can’t do it’s job and puts people at risk either in the aircraft or the people they are supposed to be protecting on the ground or on ships.


23 posted on 01/25/2014 2:20:15 PM PST by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

“Radar for a sub searcher? It needs sonar”

or MAD. To operate MAD on an aircraft the aircraft has to fly low. Therefore no MAD on the P-8...


24 posted on 01/27/2014 12:18:50 AM PST by MHalblaub ("Easy my friends, when it comes to the point it is only a drawing made by a non believing Dane...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson