How is it gossip to point out facts and then a conclusion
“How is it gossip to point out facts and then a conclusion”
Because your facts don’t support your conclusion, and in fact you have provided no evidence to support your conclusion.
Also, your conclusion is illogical. If Mr. Munoz had somehow caused the pulmonary embolism that killed Mrs. Munoz, why would he then have performed CPR on her? He found her in the middle of the night - if he wanted her dead, he could have easily “found” her couple of hours later, when CPR would have been entirely futile, and she would never have been placed on life support to begin with.
How is it gossip to point out facts and then a conclusion
<><><><
If that’s what you had done, we’d agree, but you made up the entire scenario from whole cloth.
You have NO evidence.