Skip to comments.How Federal Financial Student Aid Hurts Struggling Families
Posted on 01/27/2014 4:07:30 PM PST by Kaslin
The college bubble continues to swell, as tuitions rise at an unsustainable rate. College tuition has risen faster than inflation for over a decade; the cost of college has increased 16.5% in constant dollars since 2006. Meanwhile, the federal government keeps handing out more and more financial aid. Pell grant awards have increased 118 percent over the last decade.
Well-meaning as the aid may be, the two facts are inextricably linked. Government aid drives up college tuition. While aid undoubtedly has helped many families, it has hurt both the average family, and, paradoxically, many of those at the very bottom of the income scale.
The fact that federal student aid drives up college tuition is well-documented by both liberals and conservatives. Writing for the Cato Institute, Gary Wolfram points out, Private four-year colleges increased listed tuition prices by more than two dollars for each dollar increase in Pell grants.
Public universities also increased their tuition by $0.97 for each dollar increase in Pell grants. At the same time, the Christian Science Monitor published a report arguing that for every $1,000 of student aid, net tuition (college sticker price - financial aid) decreased by only $100 to $150. So when financial aid rises $1,000, tuition increases $850 to $900.
But while the link between federal aid and tuition hikes is clear, who it helps and hurts is not as cut-and-dried. Some families are helped by financial aid, while many others are hurt by the unintended consequence of higher tuition.
Students from low-income families are the prime beneficiaries of federal financial aid. If federal aid causes tuition at the University of Colorado to rise (say) by $3,000 per semester, but applicant John receive $5,000 in grants and some more money in cheap federal loans, than federal aid helps him to the tune of at least $2,000. For some students, that can mean the difference between being able to go to college or not; or between being able to attend a four-year university or a two-year community college. The benefits should not be understated.
However, even here the picture is muddled, because students who enroll in college and dont graduate arent helped, and low-income students are disproportionately less likely to graduate. Spotlight on Poverty points out that among low-income college students, only 25 percent graduate. Students who get Pell grants and dont take out any loans but dont graduate are only out the time and wages they would have earned if theyd been working instead.
But low-income students who take out federal loans to attend a college they dont graduate from still have to pay those loans back. Theyre saddled with debt, but dont have a degree that might help them pay it off.
But even they are not the whole picture. Federal financial aid hurts many other students. Most student aid is means-tested, meaning it goes primarily to poor recipients. According to CNN, Pell grants, the most direct form of federal aid, go primarily to families making under $45,000 per year. While families making more than this can receive federal loans or other aid, its rarely enough to offset the higher tuition driven by this aid in the first place.
Lets say that Peters family makes $50,000 per year, rendering him probably out of luck when it comes to Pell grants. Peter wants to attend University of Maryland, whose tuition has been driven up by federal aid by (say) $4,000 per year. Federal aid then hurts Peter to the tune of $4,000 per year. He can offset some of this with loans or other aid, but its a poor substitute. That might force him to go to another school, with lower tuition but also lower quality staff. Or it might force him to take out more loans to pay for school. Either way, the negative effects are significant.
The second group hurt by federal aid is, paradoxically, some poor students. Many are deterred by the high sticker price of college. Pell Grants and other aid are available to students who know how to get them, but as Cottom points out in The Atlantic, the process is a bureaucratic maze. Poorer students need financial aid to afford college, but are more likely to come from schools, families, and communities that cannot guide them through the process. Moreover, Cottom argues, the questions often require parental help, which can hurt poorer students whose parents are in jail. (http://www.slate.com/articles/life/counter_narrative/2013/11/fafsa_federal_student_aid_benefits_go_to_the_middle_class_not_the_poor.html). Federal financial aid burdens the poor with higher tuition, but often doesnt provide the aid to offset the burden.
(this would be where you talk about dropouts with debt)
As tuition continues to rise and graduates earnings decline, the college bubble is moving towards a painful burst (http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303933104579302951214561682). The solution isnt more financial aid, which drives up tuition and hurts more families (even low-income ones) than it helps. Whats needed is a free market in higher education to lower tuition prices and truly help students.
She and her army of coworkers couldn't care less. They make six figures doing it and live large working mostly from home. (and you know what that means!)
I don’t agree with government (read taxpayer) funded college. But if it exists, it should be a minimal amount of money for a public college. Why should I pay for a poor kid to attend Stanford when I can’t afford to send my kids there? Let them get a public college degree, work their butt off, then send their KIDS to an expensive private school.
In other words you believe that only those who are rich should go to college, no matter how dumb and ignorant they are, but someone that is smart , but doesn’t have to money to pay for it, well tough luck. Is that it?
That’s what private foundations and university scholarship funds are for. Get the next Boone Pickens to help send some poor smart kids to college instead of building a football stadium. When Uncle Sam tries to run a charity he does a crappy job.
It’s all part of the BIG EDUCATION cycle:
make unlimited taxpayer subsidized funds available to students
institutions raise prices to vacuum up available funds
institutions pay exorbitant salaries to profs and admins
profs and admins donate to Democrats
Smart kids stay out of college and learn on their own. I believe Thomas Edison did not go to college and had a dim view of MIT students (aside from visits at Cooper Union)
It is outright frightening to think a young punk out of college be taken seriously in understanding industry, no matter how smart on paper.
ATTENTION SPEAKER BOEHNER:
Impeachment File for the 2014 Impeachment of B. Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, a documented legal citizen of the Sovereign Nation of Indonesia.
The best graduation present you can give your child isn't a new car, spring break romps in Florida, it's to graduate with no student loans.
It's estimated that the state of Florida reaps in $800 million during spring breaks each year. Of that, 75% of it is money from student loans either indirectly or directly.
I also never said "rich". I said "Saved". If you saved no money to send your kids to college, but bought new cars, big houses, jumbo TV's, vacations, dining out, and on stuff you shouldn't have instead, you are just dumping your kids onto your neighbor's payroll deductions and then putting them into bondage of student debt due to your irresponsibility.