Skip to comments.
States consider reviving old-fashioned executions
AP via Breitbart ^
| 28 Jan 2014
Posted on 01/28/2014 6:01:40 AM PST by US Navy Vet
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: IrishBrigade
String ‘em up just far enough so the condemned is dancing lightly on his tippy-toes. Then be sure you have a corner on popcorn sales. Sales should be brisk.
21
posted on
01/28/2014 7:32:25 AM PST
by
elcid1970
("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
To: shankbear
Hanging. Snap. Over.Big plus, the rope can be used more than once.
22
posted on
01/28/2014 7:41:21 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
To: US Navy Vet
Most states abandoned those execution methods more than a generation ago in a bid to make capital punishment more palatable to the public and to a judicial system worried about inflicting cruel and unusual punishments that violate the Constitution.it needs to be stressed, again and again, that the constitution does not proscribe cruel punishments, nor does it ban unusual punishments. The constitution bans cruel and unusual punishments. You could burn convicted murderers at the stake in the public square and not violate the plain meaning of the Constitution, as long as you burned all convicted murderers at the stake in the public square.
23
posted on
01/28/2014 7:42:04 AM PST
by
Spartan79
(I view great cities as pestilential to the morals, the health, and the liberties of man. Jefferson)
To: Salvavida
For all capital cases where the death penalty is being sought, an appeals court judge should sit in the trial while it’s being conducted... After the trial is over, both sides have 90 days to appeal... If the defense can’t make their case in 90 days, then on the 91st day the convicted is put to death...
I’m a fan of “old sparky”...
24
posted on
01/28/2014 7:45:06 AM PST
by
bfh333
("Hope"... "Change"... You better HOPE you have some CHANGE after the next 4 years!)
To: Buckeye McFrog
There will just be no way to enforce it.Do like the old Soviet Union in Lubyanka (sp?). While condemned is being taken to or from his cell, executioner steps up behind him, pistol to skull. BOOM! Done! Cleanup in hall 3...
25
posted on
01/28/2014 12:02:26 PM PST
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
To: bfh333
In most cases, it's the appeals court that cannot hear the case in time. There would have to be time constraints on both sides. I like your 90 day suggestion. I would add on the back end, that the entire appeals process must be concluded 6 months after a defense appeal is filed. Hire more appeals judges: and they must be ELECTED. The Supreme Court shouldn't hear or have jurisdiction on single cases decided in the state.
I'm good with sparky, but electricity cost money. Rope is cheap, reusable, and works wonders for spinal realignment.
26
posted on
01/28/2014 12:49:18 PM PST
by
Salvavida
(The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson