Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Scott Walker and the conservatives saved Wisconsin. America, take note
The Telegraph U.K. ^ | 1/28/2014 | Cortney O' Brien

Posted on 01/28/2014 9:16:03 AM PST by Dqban22

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 01/28/2014 9:16:03 AM PST by Dqban22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dqban22

Not many in the GOP who ran something bigger than their congressional office and kicked Dems butts at the same time,if he gets re-elected too that will be a threesome.


2 posted on 01/28/2014 9:19:20 AM PST by sickoflibs (Obama : 'Any path to US citizenship for illegals HERE is a special path to it ')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dqban22

I am starting to look at Scott Walker as Presidential material. Looks to be one hell of a Governor. He is not Ivy League educated. He is not a lawyer. Hell, he never even graduated from college. Born in Colorado Springs to American parents whom were actually married. Add to that what he has done in the past few years in Wisconsin. Yep, I think I am going to get on the Walker bandwagon early.
Then sit back and watch the GOPe destroy him.


3 posted on 01/28/2014 9:27:36 AM PST by Tupelo (I am feeling more like Philip Nolan every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

OBAMA’S ROAD TO SERFDOM

By Lloyd Billingsley January 28, 2014 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/lloyd-billingsley/obamas-road-to-serfdom/print/

Barack Obama has his pen and his phone and as this report notes, the President of the United States is poised to bypass Congress and “use his control of federal agencies to impose his progressive agenda on the economy and society throughout 2014.”

This is more evidence that Barack Obama has not read Friedrich Hayek’s The Road to Serfdom, the 1944 book endorsed by John Maynard Keynes “in deeply moved agreement” both philosophical and moral. Hayek’s book nevertheless remains enlightening about president Obama and his administration in several ways.

Last year in a piece on Obamacare Washington Post columnist Michael Gerson cited Hayek on the challenge of technocratic planning: limited information. The knowledge, Hayek wrote, “never exists in concentrated or integrated form but solely as the dispersed bits of incomplete and frequently contradictory knowledge which all the separate individuals possess.”

According to Hayek, a Nobel laureate in economics, the dispute is not about “whether planning is to be done or not.” Rather, the key question is whether the planning is to be conducted “centrally, by one authority” or “divided among many individuals.” Obamacare purports to plan health care for an entire nation. By any standard, that has not worked out well.

The federal website was dysfunctional but Obamacare bosses opted to roll it out anyway. Federal officials remained uncertain how many people had “enrolled” and whether enrollees had in fact secured a policy. Among other technical and economic problems, the federal website remains insecure and state exchanges have troubles of their own.

“So maybe the problem is not Obama or Sebelius,” Gerson wrote, “but rather a government program that requires superhuman technocratic mastery.” That validates Hayek on the information problem. Another section of his “grand book,” as Keynes called it, may be even more relevant.

That would be Hayek’s chapter on “Why the Worst Get on Top” in societies trending toward central control. In those, the dominating element is “the general demand for a quick and determined government action.” Therefore it is “the man or party strong enough to ‘get things done’ who exercises the greatest appeal.” But for such a man and his party, the problems range far beyond the lack of information.

“Where there is one common all-overriding end,” Hayek notes, “there is no room for any general morals or rules.”

The principle that the end justifies the means is in fact “the denial of all morals.” The leader who really wants to get things done will “soon have to choose between disregard of ordinary morals and failure.” The necessary practices for such a leader include “cruelty and intimidation, deliberate deception and spying.”

Likewise, the “democratic statesman” determined to plan economic life will soon be confronted with the alternative of “either assuming dictatorial power or abandoning his plans.” That is why, Hayek says, in a society trending toward central control, “the unscrupulous and uninhibited are likely to be more successful.” Examples abound on the current scene.

The president is mounting a surge in his practice of legislating from the White House, a clear violation of the Constitution. This is precisely the kind of power grab outlined by Friedrich Hayek, who was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bush in 1991.

The Obama administration has deployed the IRS to intimidate groups the president dislikes. His NSA continues to spy on ordinary Americans, strip-mining their private lives beyond any legitimate security needs. Deception also abounds.

“If you like your health care plan,” the president said repeatedly, “you can keep it.” This was not, as the New York Times wrote, an “incorrect promise.” It was the sort of deliberate deception that, as Hayek noted, even democratic statesmen must indulge if they believe the end justifies the means. Barack Obama, President of the United States, is up to the task, and the results are evident.
His signature plan strips Americans of their health care policies and steers them to a dysfunctional and insecure website whose “navigators” can be convicted felons. If Americans decline to participate, the IRS will fine them. Millions of Americans are now in dire straits but Barack Obama says as long as he is president Obamacare will never be repealed.

Embattled Americans can doubtless find other evidence that the unscrupulous and uninhibited are already on top, and the nation progressing down the road to serfdom. But could this happen in the United States of America, land of the free and home of the brave? Consider Hayek’s warning:

“Even a strong tradition of political liberty is no safeguard if the danger is precisely that new institutions and policies will gradually undermine and destroy that spirit.”


4 posted on 01/28/2014 9:37:37 AM PST by Dqban22 (IVINIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

5 posted on 01/28/2014 9:51:20 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dqban22; Hunton Peck; Diana in Wisconsin; P from Sheb; Shady; DonkeyBonker; Wisconsinlady; JPG; ...

The UK (newspaper) looks at Scott Walker

FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.


6 posted on 01/28/2014 9:53:41 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

Walker is the ‘real deal’ and Wisconsin needs him for at least another term.


7 posted on 01/28/2014 9:56:18 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

His country needs him. Build slowly and allow him to be drafted.


8 posted on 01/28/2014 9:58:24 AM PST by Chickensoup (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; All

Rush just said that if we want to stay SOBER during the drinking games that go along with the ‘State of the Coup’ speech tonight, to listen for the word: WISCONSIN, LOL!

0bama will NOT mention our state, no way, no how!


9 posted on 01/28/2014 9:59:50 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

“Yep, I think I am going to get on the Walker bandwagon early.
Then sit back and watch the GOPe destroy him.”

Sadly, I think you nailed it. :(


10 posted on 01/28/2014 10:01:19 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dqban22

I truly enjoy the fact Gov.Walker is getting results, he’s a Godsend - but one of the things that have yet to be fixed in our State is on the collections end of the tax burden - the State Govt gathers 20% MORE in taxes than it actually needs to maintain itself - this became one of the causative agents of our earlier nearly $3Bil deficit under the horrid Jim Doyle. Rather than refunds, how about not planning on 1.5% growth in government every year, in other words, how about shrinking the bloated, inefficient and duplicative state government agencies? Refunds are fine if we must use them as a means, but we need to engage the system head on, throw it in a choke hold and force it to restrict its power thru onerous taxation. If Walker can lay the groundwork for that change and push to short circuit this obvious “collect and give back” deal - when it would be of greater benefit to not collect that extra 20% at all - we will have a superstar.


11 posted on 01/28/2014 10:05:04 AM PST by februus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Walker is back up to 51% Approval Rating. Disapproval rate keeps dropping, so people who DID disapprove of him are FINALLY shutting the ef UP!

However, I don’t believe their hearts or minds have turned... ;)


12 posted on 01/28/2014 10:05:27 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

He and his family are such nice people. I would hate to see them devoured and destroyed by DC.

BUT, for the good of the nation, I would be first in his cadre of volunteers.


13 posted on 01/28/2014 10:06:38 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

He is my choice. He’s taken them on in the arena and prevailed.

God bless Senator Cruz, but being a governor is more like being a President than being a Senator.

I think the best outcome is Walker as President and Cruz as Senate Majority Leader.


14 posted on 01/28/2014 10:08:42 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
I am starting to look at Scott Walker as Presidential material
Yeah, he's got my attention.
15 posted on 01/28/2014 10:18:25 AM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

It’s interesting ... This is the third or fourth thread I’ve seen today that has raised Walker as Presidential material. Unusual, usually the emphasis is on Cruz.

I hope Walker decides to run, I’m not endorsing him but know he adds elements to the GOP primary mix that arent easy to find elsewhere.


16 posted on 01/28/2014 10:18:28 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
Walker has two big advantages of Cruz.
He has executive experience in elected office
He does not have any connection to the northeast or the Ivy League.

In fact Scott Walker is proof positive that an Ivy League education is not a prerequisite for leadership in high elected office., but maybe is an impediment.

17 posted on 01/28/2014 10:28:28 AM PST by Tupelo (I am feeling more like Philip Nolan every day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

How is walker on gun rights and “immigration reform”?

He seems to be a top contender on the Republican bench.


18 posted on 01/28/2014 10:34:36 AM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededication to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas

Capitalization error — walker == Walker.


19 posted on 01/28/2014 10:36:05 AM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters for Freedom and Rededication to the Principles of the U.S. Constitution...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 3Fingas
How is walker on gun rights and “immigration reform”?

Good on guns, but... has a proclivity for wet backs.

20 posted on 01/28/2014 10:44:00 AM PST by USS Alaska (If I could...I would.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson