Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the GOP Lost Middle America
World Net Daily ^ | 18 hours ago (January 30, 2014) | Patrick J. Buchanan

Posted on 01/31/2014 10:25:32 AM PST by KGeorge

Edited on 01/31/2014 10:31:28 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Out of the Republican retreat on Maryland’s Eastern shore comes word that the House leadership is raising the white flag of surrender on immigration.

The GOP will agree to halt the deportation of 12 million illegal aliens and sign on to a blanket amnesty. It only asks that the 12 million not be put on a path to citizenship.

Sorry, but losers do not dictate terms. Rich Trumka of the AFL-CIO says amnesty is no longer enough. Illegal aliens must be put on a path to citizenship and given green cards to work – and join unions.

Rep. Paul Ryan and the Wall Street Journal are for throwing in the towel. Legalize them all and start them on the path to citizenship.

A full and final capitulation. Let’s get it over with.

To understand why and how the Republican Party lost Middle America, and faces demographic death, we need to go back to Bush I.

At the Cold War’s end, the GOP reached a fork in the road. The determination of Middle Americans to preserve the country they grew up in suddenly collided with the profit motive of Corporate America.

The Fortune 500 wanted to close factories in the USA and ship production abroad – where unions did not exist, regulations were light, taxes were low, and wages were a fraction of what they were here in America.

Corporate America was going global and wanted to be rid of its American workforce, the best paid on earth, and replace it with cheap foreign labor.

While manufacturing sought to move production abroad, hotels, motels, bars, restaurants, farms and construction companies that could not move abroad also wanted to replace their expensive American workers.

Thanks to the Republican Party, Corporate America got it all.

U.S. factories in the scores of thousands were shut down, shedding their American workers. Foreign-made goods poured in, filling U.S. stores and killing the manufacturers who had stayed behind, loyal to their U.S. workers.

The Reagan prosperity was exported to Asia and China by the Bush Republicans. And the Reagan Democrats reciprocated by deserting the Bush Republican Party and going home. But this was not the end of what this writer described in his 1998 book, “The Great Betrayal.”

As those hotels, motels, restaurants, bars, fast-food shops, car washes, groceries and other service industries also relished the rewards of cheap foreign labor, they got government assistance in replacing their American workers. snip


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; aflcio; amnesty; election2014; election2016; illegalimmigration; maryland; patbuchanan; pitchforkpat; randsconcerntrolls; richtrumka; unemployment; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: Graewoulf

krap


21 posted on 01/31/2014 11:01:12 AM PST by faithhopecharity (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

krap we are screwed again


22 posted on 01/31/2014 11:01:26 AM PST by faithhopecharity (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

He’s so far right he’s left, blaming corporations for wanting to make profits.


23 posted on 01/31/2014 11:02:00 AM PST by Daveinyork (IER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Yes, NAFTA was another of his policies totally perverted by the corporatists.


24 posted on 01/31/2014 11:02:04 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Buckeye McFrog; Graewoulf

1rudeboy- He does mention GHWB, but I can’t decide if he’s brushing aside the mistakes made by Presidents Reagan & Bush with “the Reagan democrats ‘abandoning’”. I think he is.
Yes, he probably should. As I understand it, the last president (or republican president) we had who dealt with illegal immigration in any realistic way was Eisenhower (before my time as I was a little kid). And that was during great prosperity.

Buckeye- Yeppir. And they surely will. I hadn’t heard that quote from Trumka before. (or even thought about it)

Graewolf- we can only hope that there are (still) enough unaffiliated Americans- & even some democrats, who see the hideous folly of continuing to allow illegals, unabated, into the country.

The only thing I would add to your reply is that they’re not waiting for anything (wrt to illegals, 0bamacare, NSA, or anything else). They *know* how the American people feel & they don’t care. They do this stuff *anyway*.
I can’t find it right quick, but there was an article in the last few days about ICE people all but begging Congress to enforce the immigration laws & not pass amnesty.

Years ago, I knew someone (ironically, a liberal) who had “Impeach Congress” painted on their rear bumper. I’ve been fighting the impulse to do the same for a while now (at least since 2007). Speaking of 2007, if the American people succeeded in 2007- with a democrat House *and* Senate* & this passes now, what will that say about our “representatives”? That’s a rhetorical question, of course.


25 posted on 01/31/2014 11:02:28 AM PST by KGeorge (Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

You are fine to state your opinion as fact, but it doesn’t make it so.


26 posted on 01/31/2014 11:02:51 AM PST by 1rudeboy (snort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Just look for the union label.


27 posted on 01/31/2014 11:03:46 AM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Agree. Others can look at the record for themselves and decide fact from fiction.


28 posted on 01/31/2014 11:04:01 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

The Reid-Peloci ACA Bill was rammed through with a solid Democart endorsement 12-24-2009.

In March, 2010, 14 months after he took office as the White House resident, Obama made the ACA Bill a Federal Law with a delayed start in 2013 and 2014.

Since that time Boehner has staged some 40 + lackluster votes to placate his 80 some TEA Party Members.

Boehner has been kept in power by Obama and Reid because they now that Boehner will do nothing for the good of the Country because Boehner can be bought.

Boehner pledged to repeal Obamacare, and two months later Boehner said this: “Obamacare is the Law of the Land.”

There have been NO attempts by Boehner to go for the jugular by appointing a Special prosecutor for any of the 4 major Obama Derelictions of Duty.

Boehner made no attempts to stop the illegal changing of the Obamacare Law by the Administration, effectively approving the re-writing of Law by the administration.

No dictatorial Administration could have a more helpful Speaker of the House than John “Benghazi Coverup” Boehner.

Boehner had one last chance when Reid and Obama refused to negotiate, and thereby Reid and Obama shut down part of the Federal Government.

Then Boehner refused to follow Senator Cruz and Lee, and folded to Reid and Obama like the cheap suit that he is.

Boehner is someone that should never have gone into politics.


29 posted on 01/31/2014 11:05:54 AM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

Amen!!

Preach it brother~

The future depends on action on the thoughts you have noted

To live looking into a mirror reflecting the past is doom


30 posted on 01/31/2014 11:06:04 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... History is a process, not an event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Why they don’t is beyond me - - - .

Clearly they don't have the votes and are too chicken to stand up without enough votes, and be punished when they fail.

31 posted on 01/31/2014 11:07:27 AM PST by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: staytrue

You’re absolutely right. Many businesses can’t relocate. A concrete company, for example, is pretty much stuck where it works. However, manufacturing companies can pretty much go anywhere, and they do. As the article notes, that’s why America has lost so many manufacturing jobs. We’ve made the price of legally doing business in the US too high, and I don’t think immigration amnesty is going to fix it.


32 posted on 01/31/2014 11:08:20 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Sodomy and abortion: the only constitutional rights cherished by Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

I can’t cite a list of articles he’s written, right off the top of my head, but yes, Pat Buchanan is a proponent of *much* smaller government. I’ll try & dig around later & post or Freepmail some links to you.


33 posted on 01/31/2014 11:08:28 AM PST by KGeorge (Till we're together again, Gypsy girl. May 28, 1998- June 3, 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Then let's look to Buchanan's own words, instead:

In 1985, Roger [Milliken] had come to the White House to persuade me to convince the president to sign a bill to slow the flood of textiles into the country. No way, I told Mr. Milliken. I'm the biggest free-trader in the building, except for the fellow down the hall, who was Ronald Reagan. Roger went away disappointed. Reagan vetoed the bill. And I supervised the writing of the veto message.

Within half a decade, however, some of us had seen the light and enlisted in Roger's crusade to preserve the manufacturing core of the country that he rightly saw as inextricably tied to the prosperity and the pre-eminence of the United States.

Patrick J. Buchanan, Requiem for a Patriot, January 4, 2010.

Note the implication that Reagan never "had seen the light."
34 posted on 01/31/2014 11:09:07 AM PST by 1rudeboy (truth hurts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

35 posted on 01/31/2014 11:09:44 AM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
Okay, exactly which republicans voted for Obamacare ?

Debate had to be cut off, that required some GOPe support, female as I recall. Though they claimed they only voted to let the Senate debate and vote on the bill, it was De facto passage of the bill.

36 posted on 01/31/2014 11:12:12 AM PST by itsahoot (It is not so much that history repeats, but that human nature does not change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long; Georgia Girl 2; Texas Fossil; All

Good image of Boehner taking a GEE OH PEE !


37 posted on 01/31/2014 11:12:26 AM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
I encourage anyone interested to go to Youtube & watch Reagans speeches on the subject prior to and immediately following his '80 election.

Then ask yourself if what we have today in any way resembles his stated vision

38 posted on 01/31/2014 11:12:43 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Why not just post some here?


39 posted on 01/31/2014 11:13:22 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
The Fortune 500 wanted to close factories in the USA and ship production abroad – where unions did not exist . . . Corporate America was going global and wanted to be rid of its American workforce, the best paid on earth

Does Pat seriously blame corporations for doing their fiduciary duty and trying to avoid unions—which not only cost more, but try to make jobs and job descriptions stand still when the marketplace never does? That's just nuts. I blame anyone who hasn't been fighting to get rid of Federal labor laws, which exempt unions from the laws the rest of have to follow—which are all unconstitutional. I blame Detroit unions and the politicians they bought for the death of the US auto industry because of competition from superior Japanese cars.

And now take a look at Wisconsin, Pat. Unions aren't in charge anymore, and the place is booming with American jobs. Get the idea?

40 posted on 01/31/2014 11:17:26 AM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson