Posted on 02/01/2014 4:52:21 AM PST by Kaslin
Fortunately, women who hate men and children don’t have either. Now if they’d just shut up about it, we’d all be happy, but nooooooooo.....................
X-X chromozone beings that believe the above are not women
Conservative women are more attractive than liberal women, of course.
Feminism isn’t about women’s liberation unless it’s the freedom to become childless workaholics their entire lives and advancing liberal causes. Limbaugh is correct in his use of the term “feminazi”.
I think the best comparison that can be made with “movement feminists”, is that they are in the same position that the prohibition movement was in after the 18th Amendment was passed.
Passing the 18th Amendment was the “high water mark” of the “Nasty Nellies”. But constitutional amendments by themselves don’t actually *do* anything, until they have what are called “enabling acts”, that actually specify the real laws, who enforces them, and what punishments are entailed for violating them.
In the case of the 18th Amendment, its enabling act was the Volstead Act, and by the time it was passed, everybody but the prohibitionists realized it was a bad idea. So congress intentionally made Volstead very weak and mostly worthless. From that point it was a long and violent slide downhill, until finally, in disgust, the 21st Amendment repealed the 18th.
However, the prohibition movement still exists, after a fashion. In 1895 the Anti-Saloon League became a national organization, pushing aside its older competitors, the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union and the Prohibition Party. From 1948 until 1950 it was named the Temperance League, from 1950 to 1964 the National Temperance League, from 1964 the American Council on Alcohol Problems. Today the organization continues its original goal.
In the case of “movement feminists”, their biggest victory was with Roe v. Wade. However, conservatism, still remembering the disaster of Prohibition, defeated their efforts to foist another disastrous constitutional amendment on America, the Equal Rights Amendment.
Which was recognized early on as a “stinker from Stinkersville”; designed not to improve the lot of women, but to savage the American economy, redistribute wealth to the leftists, and otherwise oppress, denigrate and impoverish the citizenry.
In any event, this is why NOW should be thought of in the same league as the Anti-Saloon League. It is their philosophical descendant.
That would be a utopia... for the men.
Thanks. I don’t know how to post pictures. LOL
They had a lot of BS ideas even back at the start of their “movement” but at least they had a few ideas that were lucid.
They have gone from seeking equal pay for equal work to whining for free rubbers. The incredible shrinking mind-numbed robots...
I’ve heard feminists say “there would be no wars if women ran the world”. These are women that use the breakroom to argue amongst themselves or gossip about others, alternatively. Yes, there would be epic wars over shoe styles and who is sleeping with whom.
And yet ... at least from what I read on FR ... these women manage to control every man in America, perhaps every man on earth. Judges, legislators, CEOs: they all do what these women want.
All I can think is that sex with them must be unbelievably incredibly spectacular.
I know of one who has a son that is as dumb as a post but for some reason thinks he is the best thing on earth second only to any liberal politician.
The hag in question has been divorced twice. I had the misfortune of meeting the hubby no. 2 a couple of times. A mix of jerk and wimp. I’m amazed he had the backbone to leave the control freak. She also was about a foot taller and maybe 75 pounds heavier than him. I’ll add bad dental work and ugly to the bone.
They are ‘ugly to the bone’ inside too - these things they stand for are really all anti good things.
You guys are lucky they hate men. Stay away.
I guess it’s not what you take when you leave this world behind you, it’s what you leave behind you when you go. - Randy Travis
There is nothing ‘feminine’ about ‘feminism’ .... it’s all “victimism”. It’s a dark, dark world with no love in it and these victimists have obviously never experienced a loving relationship with a man where each is concerned with the welfare of the other (not self) and both are blessed and gain immeasurably from it. Love makes a woman beautiful & not just in a physical way ...... which tells you a lot about what loveless state “victimists” are in when you see pictures of them and hear them spewing their ‘ugly’ views.
Only five? Must have had a word limit.
Wonder what they’d say about a guy like me, that doesn’t care about sex...
Feminazism is contrary to human nature.
I suspect most hard line feminazi types were rejected by guys back in the teen years.. they were the fat, homely ones who developed hatred for them when they missed out on all the fun stuff. So as their college years commenced, their hatred for all things male and all things traditional became calcified.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.