Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Inciting Violence Against Jews Through Inaccuracy
Algemeiner ^ | January 31, 2014 | Lindsey Cohen

Posted on 02/03/2014 5:50:54 AM PST by SJackson

On Aug. 24, 1929, 67 Jews were killed in what later came to be known as the Hebron Massacre.

Prior to that, the Jewish Community of Hebron had coexisted for hundreds of years along with the Arab residents of Hebron. The Jewish community was convinced that the Arab community, with whom they had enjoyed friendly relations, would continue with such relations. Aharon Reuven Bernzweig, who had been visiting with his wife in Hebron, remembered his encounter with the Jewish community there, saying he was assured by the community that “in Hebron there could never be a pogrom, because as many times as there had been trouble elsewhere in Eretz Israel, Hebron had remained quiet. The local population had always lived very peacefully with the Arabs.”

Tensions had been increasing between the communities as the efforts toward establishing the Jewish state increased. Feeling threatened by these endeavors, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem falsified reports to his followers saying that the Jews were planning on overtaking the Al-Aqsa Mosque on the Dome of the Rock and that the blood of the Arabs ran through the streets of Jerusalem.

The Arabs in Hebron went door to door, staging a pogrom on the Jewish community. More than 400 Jews were saved by two dozen Arab families who chose to hide and protect the Jewish families they had come to know. After the massacre, the Jewish families were evacuated to Jerusalem, temporary putting a halt to the Jewish presence in the area.

On Jan. 17, 2014, the Middle East Monitor released the article “Israeli Settlers Storm Al Aqsa Mosque and Climb Dome of the Rock,” claiming that Jews had “stormed” the Temple Mount on a Friday. The Temple Mount is the most holy site in the world for the Jewish people and the third Holiest site for Muslims. This article, which circulated the Internet as people tried to discern whether or not it was accurate, appeared to be a provocation for more violence in Israel. It also served as an exaggeration by a news source that falsely identifies the Israeli Defense Forces as the “Israeli Occupation Forces.” Like the Grand Mufti’s announcements in Jerusalem in 1929, the article was intended to incite violence and spread hatred among the communities.

Yehuda Glick, director of the LIBA initiative for Jewish Freedom on the Temple Mount, and mentioned in the article, also clarified the inaccuracy of the article. According to Glick, The Temple Mount has 10 gates, nine of these gates are open seven days a week for Muslims. One of these gates is open three hours a day, five days a week for Jews. The article maintains that Glick entered the mount on Friday, while in actuality it is forbidden for a Jew to enter the Temple Mount on this day.

According to Natan Epstein, a videographer living in Jerusalem, the article was a falsification and a provocation. Most observant Jews will not enter the Dome of the Rock as it is where the “Holy of Holies” from the Temple once stood. Security in the area, he says, is also “very tight.”

Today, the Jewish people are prohibited from praying at their holiest site. The Jordan Waqf retains control over the Dome of the Rock. As tensions continue to rise in Israel over the current Peace Process, the Temple Mount remains a source of conflict among the communities living in Israel. While the Jewish people fight for a basic right to be able to pray at their holiest site, news media outlets such as the Middle East Monitor use this issue to stir up further violence and tension between people living in Israel.


TOPICS: Editorial; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/03/2014 5:50:54 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume

If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

..................

2 posted on 02/03/2014 5:52:04 AM PST by SJackson (the Democrats take back control, we don’t make (this) kind of naked power grab, J Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Inciting Violence Against Jews Through Inaccuracy

I grew up being told that the Jews controlled the papers and the media, as well as, Hollywood. Certainly they should be in a position to turn the tables, if only they would get their noses out of Hussein's butt!

3 posted on 02/03/2014 5:53:09 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Who but a TYRANT shoves down another man's throat what he has exempted himself from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

There is no ‘palestine’ but for the Roman derived appellation. Nor are there any ‘palestinians’ but for gaggles of predominantly arab terrorists which Israel, for whatever God forsaken reason, feels compelled to put up with.


4 posted on 02/03/2014 6:23:52 AM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Islamopithecine koranimals down through history will use any excuse to kill Jews. And when they run out of Jews (ME, Iran, Pakistan, etc.) guess who’s always next?


5 posted on 02/03/2014 8:15:48 AM PST by elcid1970 ("In the modern world, Muslims are living fossils.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Another day, another blood libel.


6 posted on 02/03/2014 8:45:45 AM PST by Slings and Arrows (You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
"Palestine" was the official name of the British protectorate following the Treaty of Versailles. Its capital was Jerusalem. It had its own postage stamps with the name Palestine on them beginning in 1922.

It wasn't exactly a country but it was as much of one as any other British colony in the imperial era.

7 posted on 02/04/2014 5:39:30 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I know that many Jews referred to even themselves as Palestinians prior to Israeli independence. But that proceeded from an ignorance of history which at its origin and its core was anti-Jewish by design. That the Jews of the region couldn’t see that has nothing to do with me.

I stand by my earlier post.


8 posted on 02/04/2014 8:17:24 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson