Posted on 02/05/2014 4:05:46 PM PST by Carbonsteel
Democracy is starting to get me down.
Oh, I know what you're thinking: I write regularly about American politics, and democracy is only just starting to get me down?
Okay, good point. Maybe I should say that democracy is starting to get me down even more than it usually does.
And why is that? Because it's beginning to dawn on me that Jeb Bush is probably going to be the Republican Party's nominee for president in 2016.
Consider: With the ongoing implosion of Chris Christie's political career, the GOP establishment has lost its best hope for a candidate who could stop a libertarian-populist insurgency during the primaries. Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Scott Walker — the list of viable fire-breathers is longer (and less dominated by incompetents, crazies, and one-note sideshow acts) than establishment types would like.
What are the alternatives?
(Excerpt) Read more at theweek.com ...
I agree.
Every so often things reach a point where the establishment candidate gets overwhelmed by the popular sentiment.
Case in point is the nomination of Reagan in 1980.
Now we don’t have another Reagan out there, but the movement groundswell is definitely present. It just needs to consolidate behind a single candidate and do so quickly.
The only way Jeb wins the nomination is if conservatives do a circular firing squad with three or four acceptable Conservative candidates in the mix. If that happens, we only have ourselves to blame ...
“Stay out’da bushes” - Jesse “Shakedown” aka “HymieTown” Jackson
Are there any other Bush relatives in that family that can run in later years? I'm hoping it all doesn't end with Jeb.
Then the GOP has already lost another election
I will vote in the primaries but if Jeb gets the nomination—I will not vote for him. I am done with the hold your nose theory. I am also sick of the royal families of politics.
That's a false pretense right there.
Romney wasn't "a little too liberal."
Romney was literally on the activist wrong side of every crucial issue and principle, from forced acceptance of homosexual norming, to government-run health care. Some of us actually did our due diligence on the guy.
Did you?
“Then he can be the 2016 nominee without our votes and lose, maybe winning just a dozen smaller states, possibly not even TX.”
A Republican will win Texas.
Rove and his inside-the-beltway "club-rinos" are in your corner.
I thought he said that he wasn’t running?
It’s too soon to be this despondent.
four more years for Bill
We “rinos” just don’t go for rookies. Cruz has no chance in 2016 because he is a rookie. If he runs well in 2016, it will be his turn in 2020 or 2024.
The next nominee will be Romney again (not a rookie due to 2012), Paul Ryan (not a rookie because of 2012), Rick Santorum (finished 2nd in 2012 and not a rookie), Jeb Bush (not a rookie because dad and brother have been potus) or maybe Palin (not a rookie due to 2008).
You're right. Valerie Jarret may suspend all federal elections and we don't have to worry...
/s
I am sure Ann Coulture will come out shortly and tell us we are idiots and rubes if we don’t vote for dasBush.
But I say no and HELL no!
If they pick a RINO I will be staying home and not voting.
I agree with you!
Choices, a big govt Bushie or a bigger govt dem...me vote down ticket Conservative.
... operate the primaries as usual.
I'm mentally prepared for it now, which I most certainly WASN'T when McCain actually got the nomination in '08. In 2007, I'd have said anyone who thought it possible was insane.
In 2014, I'm saying that anyone who thinks it likely that Business As Usual will dominate the GOP primaries, where liberal north-eastern states do the weeding-out, will give America in 2016 another Romney-like "Republican," is very sane indeed.
Prepare for action, is all I'm sayin'. I hope I'm wrong and the GOP nominates a TEA type limited government conservative, but ... I don't think so.
I'm looking ahead figuring that in 2016, we're going to be in a familiar pickle. The GOPe will force a third party split, and it's best to start now figuring out how we might use it to advantage for the advance of limited government conservatism.
What a strange article. As soon as the guy said he was counting on Christie you have to know he was full of crap. Then he says “Indeed, for the Republican establishment, it may come down to this: Only a Bush can beat a Clinton.” Say what? A Bush has run against a Clinton once that I can recall. The Bush lost. Clinton was smart, articulate and up and coming dude against Daddy Bush who was not much of a speaker.
It’s not about names. It’s about getting conservatives like Cruz that can communicate, persuade and reach people.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.