Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lavaroise

The only way I could see it kind of making sense, is if that city got to be known as a mecca for duels. I can very well see even the most conservative sheriff then saying “Not here, gentlemen, this city is a no-duel zone.” But if that were the case, would our dear liberals tell us? Probably not.


14 posted on 02/06/2014 12:18:26 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar for you if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

I know there were so many different hadji governments changes in Yemen, they have such a ban in the militarized city of Sanaa. However the historicism of the liberals will always ignore the cases of bandits smuggling in weapons into such cities or the obvious fact that surrounding country side did mandate to have a weapon to survive which in no way turned the Sheriff into a Federal Bloomberg.

There simply is no equivalency of politization of the cause as it is done today.


16 posted on 02/06/2014 12:36:49 AM PST by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

.... a Federal Bloomberg.
There simply is no equivalency of politization of the cause as it is done today.

... and liberals are using lies and strawman arguments again and again, comparing Apples and Oranges.


17 posted on 02/06/2014 12:39:16 AM PST by lavaroise (A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson