Posted on 02/07/2014 11:56:13 AM PST by US Navy Vet
A federal judge in Missouri ruled this week held that drivers have a First Amendment right to flash their headlights to warn other motorists of nearby police and speed traps.
The order by U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey in St. Louis on Monday stems from a lawsuit filed by Ellisville resident Michael Elli. In 2012, Elli flashed his headlights to warn oncoming vehicles of a radar set up by police in the town of Ellisville.
A flash of headlights is a common way motorists communicate to oncoming drivers of either a dangerous situation or the presence of police in essence, a warning to slow down.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Yeah. I thought the cell phone jammer was kewel myself.
Then I thought about emergencies or cops breaking into your house with no announcement.
Yes, you're right. Make sure your lights are working, your registration and insurance are in order, and your buttocks don't appear to be clenched.
Suppose you had a police scanner, and you heard that the cops were coming to pick up your neighbor. So you run over to your neighbor’s house, and speak, using your 1st amendment right to free speech “Hey, the police are coming to arrest you” — and your neighbor hops in his car and gets away.
Do you think this is OK, or have you aided a criminal to evade capture?
I think you might be able to distinguish that from flashing lights by an argument that you don’t KNOW that anybody on the other side is speeding, plus speeding isn’t really a criminal violation, more of a civil thing.
whats the signal/warning of anal exams ahead?
___
Just plain flashing, Id guess.
Vanity plates are a dead give-away that you're a smart @ss.
Young, brash and naive....I ditched my vanity plate early-on. ;D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.