Did CIA official suppress Benghazi narrative? Accounts raise new questions

fox ^ | 2/14/14 | Catherine Herridge

[Nachum]

New information about the intelligence available in the immediate aftermath of the Benghazi attack raises questions about whether the former No. 2 at the CIA downplayed or dismissed reporting from his own people in Libya that it was a coordinated attack and not an out-of-control protest over an anti-Islam video.

Then-Deputy Director Mike Morell, whose own agency lost two employees at Benghazi, former Navy Seals Ty Woods and Glen Doherty, was heavily involved in editing the administration’s internal narrative on what happened – known as the “talking points” – which served as the basis for then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s controversial claims about a protest on the Sunday talk shows after the attack.

According to the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report on Benghazi, on Sept. 15, four days after the attack and one day before Rice’s appearance, the CIA's most senior operative on the ground in Libya emailed Morell and others at the agency that the attack was "not/not an escalation of protests."

[no-to-illegals]

Something else ... am NOT really certain bin laden is dead. My gut tells me the bin laden death, at the hands of zer0 is a ruse. I’ve never typed this because I wanted to believe we did get bin laden but .... am not certain anymore. Can’t elaborate because it is simply a gut thing.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Question: Was this possibly a legitimate coverup to support a worthwhile covert action(s)?

No.

[GOPJ]

This stuff will be in a court of law in the future. Blind eyes or not - justice will be done.

[rodguy911]

Bottom line for me, I don’t trust hardly any agency of govt. anymore. FBI, cia, nsa most of the rest. they have proven they are not trustworthy.
I trust what we do here little else.

[Nachum]

[Nachum]