Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angry at Ted Cruz, Republicans should remember what he represents
The Washington Examiner ^ | February 13, 2014 | Byron York

Posted on 02/15/2014 9:37:32 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

Republicans have a good chance to win control of the Senate this November. Democrats are on the defensive over Obamacare, the president is unpopular, and history suggests second-term mid-terms are nearly always unlucky for the White House.

Given that, why is there so much division, backbiting, and bad blood among some Senate Republicans? Last seen during the government shutdown fiasco, the GOP malady returned this week with a debt ceiling mini-fiasco, and it threatens to revisit the Senate any number of times before Election Day.

There is at least one common thread in the shutdown and debt ceiling incidents, and that is Sen. Ted Cruz. For whatever reason, the Texas freshman has at times goaded his party to dysfunction, embarrassment, and defeat. (Not quite singlehandedly; others, like Sens. Mike Lee and Rand Paul, have also been done their bit.)

Many in the GOP believe Cruz is just out for himself. But even if that's true, they have to remember that he represents more than just Ted Cruz. There are a lot of Republicans -- it's not clear how many, but a significant portion of the party's base -- that cheers Cruz on when he battles with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell. They want to see a Republican throw a wrench in the Washington spending machine, even if it creates chaos and damages the GOP's standing with independent voters. And it is that conviction that is really behind the party's problems; it is why Republicans would not enjoy smooth sailing even if Cruz were to retire tomorrow.

What was remarkable about the brief debt limit fight is how small the stakes were. Republicans, burned by recent failures, did not propose to add some huge fiscal reform -- a restructuring of entitlements, for example -- to a measure to raise the debt limit. Instead, they discussed more modest measures, like reworking the cost-of-living adjustment for veterans that was part of the recent bipartisan budget deal.

When the week began, Senate Republicans expected the House to attach something small to the debt limit bill that would be sent to the Senate. They were taken off guard Tuesday morning when House Speaker John Boehner announced that wouldn't happen -- that the House, relying on mostly Democratic votes, would instead pass a bill to raise the debt limit with no strings attached.

Senate Republicans met in their weekly lunch a few hours after Boehner's announcement. The short version of events is that McConnell urged colleagues to allow a vote on the House debt limit bill. If the GOP did not object, it could be passed with a simple 51-vote majority, and since there are 55 Democrats in the Senate who would vote for it, every Republican could vote against it and it would still pass. Problem solved; there would be no more default talk, and Republicans could go back to slamming Democrats over Obamacare.

Then Cruz stood up and said there was no way in the world he would stand by and allow a debt ceiling increase to be passed with just 51 votes. Cruz insisted on a 60-vote threshold, which the rules allowed him to do. That meant at least five Republicans would have to join Democrats for the debt limit to be raised.

It would be an understatement to say that many of Cruz's GOP colleagues were righteously ticked off at him. Nobody wanted to vote to raise the debt limit, but many believed strongly that a losing fight over spending would damage the party. Besides, Cruz didn't even have a plan for what to do had his Republican colleagues improbably decided to go along with him.

So after some testy exchanges at the lunch, and a lot of negotiating in the afternoon, McConnell and other leaders decided to vote for the debt limit increase. Then several other Republicans, mostly those in unthreatened seats, agreed to vote along with them to provide cover. The bill passed with 12 Republicans joining all 55 Democrats.

Cruz, of course, voted no and accused lawmakers who voted yes of "not listening to the American people." He even suggested those who are up for re-election — a group that very prominently includes McConnell himself — might soon pay a heavy price. "Sometimes, come November, the people remember," Cruz said.

In the end, the gambit accomplished nothing for Senate Republicans. Some GOP lawmakers who already disliked Cruz now dislike him even more. But the episode did remind the Republican leadership, as if it needs any reminding, that there are conservatives around the country who are deeply frustrated by the GOP and want it to show some fight.

To them, Cruz represents that fight. Maybe they've been misled. Maybe they're living in a fantasy land. But that's what they believe. Republican leaders have to keep them in mind as November approaches.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2014election; 2016election; cruz; election2014; election2016; mcconnell; teaparty; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

The author does not see that this is not a stand alone thing. The republicans ran the table in 2000 and the conservatives got nothing. The republicans are controlling the house and the conservatives are not getting the response they expect. Cruz is demonstrating to the base that the republican leadership is more interested in power than risking their positions to fight. The author does not understand that the republican base sees that the leadership cannot muster any intellectual argument against this regime.. and yet it is child’s play to do so. I could go on and on.


21 posted on 02/15/2014 10:19:19 AM PST by BRL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The ruling class doesn’t get it. Ted Cruz appeals to most of us because he seems to be the only one in Washington who is listening to us!!!!


22 posted on 02/15/2014 10:24:28 AM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Given that, why is there so much division, backbiting, and bad blood among some Senate Republicans?

The only reasonable explanation is that the GOP leadership has been infiltrated and hijacked by progressives. Why else would they oppose conservatives so vehemently?

23 posted on 02/15/2014 10:26:26 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fantail 1952

Ted Cruz will fire up the 2016 nominating convention.


24 posted on 02/15/2014 11:07:41 AM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Funny... We’re spending ourselves into oblivion and any resistance to that is “fantasy land”... I’d rather be in fantasy land than insanity land.


25 posted on 02/15/2014 11:33:36 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Last seen during the government shutdown fiasco, the GOP malady returned this week with a debt ceiling mini-fiasco, and it threatens to revisit the Senate any number of times before Election Day.

There is at least one common thread in the shutdown and debt ceiling incidents, and that is Sen. Ted Cruz. For whatever reason, the Texas freshman has at times goaded his party to dysfunction, embarrassment, and defeat. (Not quite singlehandedly; others, like Sens. Mike Lee and Rand Paul, have also been done their bit.)

Byron York: working for the GOPe in "The Establishment Strikes Back"!

26 posted on 02/15/2014 11:36:21 AM PST by Fledermaus (If we here in TN can't get rid of the worthless Lamar, it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

I feel that the GOpe has misplaced anger. You should not be angry with Cruz and conservatives for acting like GOP Icon Ronald Reagan who also acted like a conservative Republican and I might add chastised Gerry Ford.

If the Gope went after Democrats and spent the money they are now spending to kill the Tea Party we might actually become the majority in the Senate in November.

Last I looked only The GOPe is spending money to defeat conservatives, not Mr. Cruz.

The Gope is off Ronald Reagan’s message. If they want to win emulate RR he was a winner, and his ideological son Ted Cruz.


27 posted on 02/15/2014 11:40:45 AM PST by Zenjitsuman (New Boss Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

I think the real reason is that the Dems got pics of Boner and McConnell having sex with goats.


28 posted on 02/15/2014 12:27:49 PM PST by MuttTheHoople (Nothing is more savage and brutal than justifiably angry Americans. DonÂ’t believe me? Ask the Germa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Nobody wanted to vote to raise the debt limit, but many believed strongly that a losing fight over spending would damage the party.

It's always about the damn party with these hacks, never the country.

29 posted on 02/15/2014 12:48:53 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am VERY surprised at how Byron York worded this story. MR. York appears to be a RINO.

I have always enjoyed reading his take on Washington, but this time, after Rush’s Friday comments regarding so called conservative media, I must Re-iterate York is a RINO big G’ment Elitist


30 posted on 02/15/2014 1:14:24 PM PST by DanZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

There’s but one reason why Cruz and Palin standout so far from other politicians, that’s they emit honesty from every pore when they speak to an audience. There’s no fluff, no minimizing of painful facts, just pure honesty. That is why I support them.


31 posted on 02/15/2014 1:17:23 PM PST by B4Ranch (Name your illness, do a Google & YouTube search with "hydrogen peroxide". Do it and be surprised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I consider myself to be a member of the Constitution Party. McCain was the last liberal I’ll ever vote for. I only voted for him because of the alternative, but it turns out one is as bad as the other.


32 posted on 02/15/2014 2:26:18 PM PST by LouAvul (In a state of disbelief as to how liberals destroyed America in a mere 40 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson