Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Su-35 does not guarantee air superiority for the PLA Air Force: PLA Daily
Want China Times ^ | 2014-02-16 | 2014-02-16

Posted on 02/16/2014 11:34:37 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

Major figures within the People's Liberation Army Air Force have differing opinions about whether purchasing Su-35s from Russia really serves the interests of the Chinese military aviation industry, according to the Taipei-based Central News Agency (CNA) in an interview with Andrei Chang, a Canadian military analyst.

During a press conference held at the Singapore Air Show of 2014, Mikhail Pogosyan, the general director of United Aircraft Corporation, said that Russia is unlikely to support China copying its advanced fighters again as it did in the 1990s. Copying other nation's fighter will not bring any major improvement to the Chinese aviation industry, especially since the Su-35 is not a new fighter. China should design its own advanced fighter, Pogosyan said.

The Su-35 does not guarantee air superiority for the PLA Air Force in the next 10 years, a professor from the PLA Air Force Command College said in a commentary for the Party-run PLA Daily. A similar view is being shared by many important figures in the Chinese military, said Pinkov. The current consensus reached between Beijing and Moscow will provide 24 Su-35s along with Saturn AL-41s — also known as 117S engines — to China.

Still, both sides have not reached any agreement yet regarding the transfer of Su-35's technology to China. Even though Russia is trying to terminate its cooperation with China in designing new fighter, Pogosyan said that it will be more suitable for both nations to help each other in building wide-body commercial aircraft.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; china; russia; su35

A Russian Su-35. (Internet Photo)

1 posted on 02/16/2014 11:34:37 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Maybe it doesn’t guarantee superiority but it’s really cool looking.


2 posted on 02/16/2014 11:37:51 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Agreed.


3 posted on 02/16/2014 11:41:37 AM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

They just realized that the plane’s biggest negative is that it’s made from Chinese parts?

I can just picture it in a dogfight. Opposing pilots will be bummed out that the Chinese plane fell apart without even shooting anything at it.


4 posted on 02/16/2014 11:46:20 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Can I buy one at Walmart?


5 posted on 02/16/2014 12:05:14 PM PST by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I guess they’ll just have to settle for their “Chinese copies” of the F-22 then.


6 posted on 02/16/2014 12:22:31 PM PST by null and void (<--- unwilling cattle-car passenger on the bullet train to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult

Those Chinese parts regularly put people and satellites into space. Meanwhile we have to hitch rides on old Russian Soyuz rockets.


7 posted on 02/16/2014 12:32:37 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
When the F-86 Sabre was introduced to the Korean conflict, the MiG-15 lost its air superiority.

When the MiG-15bis was introduced, the F-86 met its equal and their fights were won by pilot skill, tactics and training.

In Vietnam, "low tech" Soviet aircraft, usually flown by less experienced pilots, downed significant numbers of Allied jets, even those thought to be technologically superior.

Since then, Russian planes and clones have gotten a lot better, while ours and our tactics have been on display for all to study.

Air superiority is yet to be determined and will be decided on a case by case basis, should events and human nature make such a determination necessary.

8 posted on 02/16/2014 1:08:51 PM PST by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Doesnt look very stealthy to me.


9 posted on 02/16/2014 1:40:38 PM PST by ro_dreaming (Chesterton, 'Christianity has not been tried and found wanting. ItÂ’s been found hard and not tried')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

They’ve been at the rocket game for several hundred years, their own jet fighters are a recent development.


10 posted on 02/16/2014 2:06:46 PM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (Liberals make unrealistic demands on reality and reality doesn't oblige them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

I have yet to have a Chinese gun fail me. I have a few and they can handle more many rounds with minimal cleaning.


11 posted on 02/16/2014 4:49:33 PM PST by mcshot (Their fraud is deep and unending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson