Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy

Well, Jackson was dead by then, so that wasn’t an issue. I don’t know if I can come up with a definitive “worst” of the 19th century. Pierce was equally a pitiable figure, and between dealing with the horrible loss of his son and his wife’s jet-black depression over it (and that he was plastered for much of his term), I tend to cut him some slack.

Jackson himself might be up for worst, because he was too temperamentally unsuited to serve (and his wife died right after the election from the stress of the campaign). His actions also helped in de-unifying the South politically (in the post-Era of Good Feelings) and that of the Democrat Party after the collapse of the Federalists. Andrew Johnson also didn’t handle things well, either (but the impeachment proceedings represented an overreach). Grant’s administration was corrupt, and I’m not sure his serving as President was a good idea (Ohio’s John Sherman was probably a better bet, and he had the experience and problem-solving abilities, but he lost at the conventions).


31 posted on 02/17/2014 9:05:16 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj
Johnson, yes he stunk. I'd have done the prudent thing and voted to remove him.

1 vote from the White House!

33 posted on 02/18/2014 9:47:13 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson