Skip to comments.
Obama blesses climate science as ‘irrefutable’
The Daily Caller ^
| 2/20/2014
| Neil Munro
Posted on 02/20/2014 6:53:37 AM PST by rktman
President Barack Obama says the current understanding of climate science is infallible.
“The science is irrefutable,” Obama declared during a Monday press conference in Mexico, where he appeared with Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto, and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
“We’re already seeing severe weather patterns increase…[and that] has the potential of displacing people in ways that we cannot currently fully anticipate, and will be extraordinarily costly,” he claimed, as justification for the remarkable claim.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: climatechange; demokkkrats; didiots
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Oh, well I guess there no point in arguing about it anymore now that "he" has declared it to be irrefutable. Well, I stll "fute" it. But that's just me. I'm guessin' the multi-degreed climate scientist algore was the consultant on this. Maybe with a little michael mann and prince charles tossed in for good measure.
1
posted on
02/20/2014 6:53:37 AM PST
by
rktman
To: rktman
So I guess the many people who refute it are... what, crazy?
In need of ‘re-education’ perhaps?
2
posted on
02/20/2014 6:55:18 AM PST
by
Mr. K
(If you like your constitution, you can keep it...Period.)
To: rktman
He mispronounced “unfalsifiable”.
3
posted on
02/20/2014 6:55:55 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: rktman
I thought he was President, not a climatologist
4
posted on
02/20/2014 6:56:10 AM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: rktman
From the same people who tell us that Rush Limbaugh shouldn’t talk about global warming because he isn’t a climate scientist.
5
posted on
02/20/2014 6:57:03 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
(How do you feel about robbing Peter's robot?)
To: combat_boots
6
posted on
02/20/2014 6:57:17 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
To: rktman
Says the US Constitution "scholar" with zero science background.
7
posted on
02/20/2014 6:57:26 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Moslems reserve the right to behead anyone who says otherwise.)
To: Eric in the Ozarks
8
posted on
02/20/2014 6:58:28 AM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: rktman
Obama’s opinion, that is all. Pay no attention.
9
posted on
02/20/2014 6:58:36 AM PST
by
Biggirl
(“Go, do not be afraid, and serve”-Pope Francis)
To: rktman
Well, at least in my case is is correct. My current understanding of Climate Change is that the climate changes all of the time without any help from man, and that humans are unable to do much about it even if they tried.
10
posted on
02/20/2014 6:59:16 AM PST
by
jdsteel
(Give me freedom, not more government.)
To: rktman
SCIENCE IS NOT RULED BY CONSENSUS ! ! !
The Consensus was that the Sun went around the Earth.
11
posted on
02/20/2014 6:59:25 AM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: rktman
He’s dishonest AND stupid.
12
posted on
02/20/2014 7:00:27 AM PST
by
DManA
To: rktman
Uhhh...anything that predicts the future is refutable by the future.
13
posted on
02/20/2014 7:01:49 AM PST
by
grania
To: rktman
Does anyone really care what this bonehead says anymore?
To: FReepers
Click The Pic To Donate
Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can
15
posted on
02/20/2014 7:02:32 AM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
To: rktman
‘irrefutable’...Like his birth certifiate.
16
posted on
02/20/2014 7:03:01 AM PST
by
SMARTY
("When you blame others, you give up your power to change." Robert Anthony)
To: rktman
Also irrefutable:
Every time California elects Jerry Brown, they have a drought!
17
posted on
02/20/2014 7:06:02 AM PST
by
Darteaus94025
(Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
To: DManA
He’s dishonest AND stupid.
***********
Now that’s irrefutable!
To: rktman
Regarding this notion of the appeal to numbers - consensus - I submit the following.
In 1982, Australian researchers Barry J. Marshall and Robin Warren disagreed with the entire medical community's "consensus science" that stress was to blame for ulcers in the stomach and intestine. The two "deniers" postulated that the bacterium Helicobacter pylori was the cause of gastritis and peptic ulcer disease. No one believed it. The Australians’ idea was contrary to consensus and dogma because it was thought (ie unproven but believed) that peptic ulcer disease was the result of stress and lifestyle.
In 2005, Marshall and Warren were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. That is 23 years after the discovery of evidence, that it took to counteract the beliefs of "scientific consensus."
19
posted on
02/20/2014 7:08:06 AM PST
by
Sgt_Schultze
(A half-truth is a complete lie)
To: rktman
This is getting scary.
Whether its Climate Change, the Minimum Wage, Ukraine or whatever, he seems to think all he has to do is give a speech decreeing that 2+2 does not equal 4, and it will make it so.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson