Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. Senator Proposes Bill That Would Cripple American Gun Industry
Townhall.com ^ | 02/20/14 | Christine Rousselle

Posted on 02/21/2014 4:10:44 AM PST by harpu

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2014 4:10:44 AM PST by harpu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: harpu

Semper Fi, Doc.


2 posted on 02/21/2014 4:13:52 AM PST by ComputerGuy (HM2/USN M/3/3 Marines RVN '66-'67)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

MA - exporting tyranny from the massholes to the rest of the country again


3 posted on 02/21/2014 4:14:04 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Ed Markey’s last real job was as an ice cream man in Malden.


4 posted on 02/21/2014 4:17:36 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Let’s make sure that the Secret Service is the first to use this technology.


5 posted on 02/21/2014 4:19:01 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
Let’s make sure that the Secret Service is the first to use this technology.

That was my first thought. Secret Service first, then require the police to use it. Then, once it's "perfected" require it of the hoi polloi. (This will NEVER happen!)

6 posted on 02/21/2014 4:23:34 AM PST by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Ed Markey’s last real job was as an ice cream man in Malden.

That was so long ago I'd bet even Ed doesn't remember.

7 posted on 02/21/2014 4:25:02 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Can’t this legislation be renamed to “Dual Class Weapons; Class-1 Unusable Weaponry for Citizenry; Class-2 Usable Weaponry for Criminals”


8 posted on 02/21/2014 4:26:31 AM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Within three years of enactment, anyone selling a handgun must retrofit it with personalization technology before that sale can be completed;

They managed to combine this BS with outlawing private sales.

MOLON LABE you bastards.

9 posted on 02/21/2014 4:28:43 AM PST by SIDENET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
Idiocy at the highest level.

Let's have the police go first. If it works for them, great, they can keep it and still kiss my ass.

The issue of weaponry being a fundamental right is totally lost on Massholes and other Leftists. Yet, not surprising as these are the same people who want to geographically limit freedom of religion to the confines of a church (if then) and are A-OK putting government monitors in every news room.

10 posted on 02/21/2014 4:29:55 AM PST by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

HooRAH!


11 posted on 02/21/2014 4:30:51 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Long Live Big Brother!

IMHO


12 posted on 02/21/2014 4:33:41 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

I think the proposed legislation should be amended to say that the technology first be used on, and only on, law enforcement officer weapons, for a period of two years. Then evaluate how well it’s working out!


13 posted on 02/21/2014 4:35:46 AM PST by FairWitness (Everything is easy, once you've done it once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu
This has noting do do with safety.

It also doesn't matter if the technology works or not.

It is a crushing mountain of bureaucracy leveled at gun owning Americans. Antigun forces seek to make everything more and more difficult, and steadily chip away at what you are "allowed" to own, until the state has effectively disarmed you.

Note the almost religious zeal with which the antigun Left pursues its goals, and ask yourself if it seems like they have "safety" in mind.

14 posted on 02/21/2014 4:39:13 AM PST by SIDENET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Our rights, taken away by a thousand little cuts prefaced with “...any sensible action to...” Why do we have tens of thousands of laws on the books? Is life that complex? God only needed ten.


15 posted on 02/21/2014 4:54:42 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Stop obarma now! Stop the hussein - insane agenda!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairWitness
I think the proposed legislation should be amended to say that the technology first be used on, and only on, law enforcement officer weapons, for a period of two years. Then evaluate how well it’s working out!

I'd make it a ten-year law enforcement test period. Also, I'd extend the requirements to cover police carbines as well, since every year there are several stories about police AR-15s being left lost or badly mishandled.

16 posted on 02/21/2014 5:00:42 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: harpu
We are getting close.
I don't care how great the stock market is doing, or "corporate profits" (Kudlow's happy yardstick).
Ever-more brazen assaults on our 1st and 2nd Amendments is the real yardstick.

Not sure when the Lexington amnd Concord moment will be, but it's visible out there on the horizon.

17 posted on 02/21/2014 5:19:46 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

Imagine if the “smart technology” included access from the web - like how you can turn unlock your door using your smartphone. It’s for your own good, you know, like a built in tracking device. Lojack for your gun. But then the gov’t can control your gun.


18 posted on 02/21/2014 5:33:19 AM PST by kdot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

If anyone needs a refresher on what they are doing, study smoking or car safety. One little move after another. Each small step makes us less free.


19 posted on 02/21/2014 5:41:44 AM PST by Seabeejas (h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee

Let’s make sure that the Secret Service is the first to use this technology.


Yes. And the FBI are the true leaders in the law-enforcement gun tech world. Local agencies follow the FBI on all their gun and ammo choices.

So by executive order, as president, I hereby order the FBI to implement a plan to adopt this technology for all duty sidearms. The old guns will be sold by the CMP at market prices (by auction to individuals).

After five years of fully-implemented track record, we can discuss whether this technology would also provide a public safety benefit.


20 posted on 02/21/2014 6:03:22 AM PST by Atlas Sneezed ("Income Inequality?" Let's start with Washington DC vs. the rest of the nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson