Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene

No, I don’t know the case. I’m going to have to look up US v Williams.

Scalia sees the Grand Jury separately from Articles I, II, III since it’s in an amendment. At the same time, Art III says the judiciary has jurisdiction over all cases....something like that.


21 posted on 02/22/2014 8:28:03 AM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; Girlene

Here’s a link to the case that contains Scalia’s comments.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=504&invol=36


28 posted on 02/22/2014 8:42:09 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson