Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can Quiet, Efficient 'Space Elevators' Really Work?
space.com ^ | February 21, 2014 12:25 PM | Leonard David

Posted on 02/22/2014 8:13:46 PM PST by ckilmer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: ckilmer

The idea should be advanced so that there are two ribbons that are in motion. One side going down, the other side going up. The tether would then be a pulley in space to provide the gravitational anchor.

This would allow the lifting power to be driven by the ground station and would allow for multiple “ups” and multiple “downs” at the same time.


21 posted on 02/22/2014 8:40:46 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
He said back in 2003 that ten years after people stopped laughing about the space elevator — work would begin on it. He thought that people had stopped laughing that year

My bad. I giggled a little in 2008.

22 posted on 02/22/2014 8:41:08 PM PST by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

62,000 miles of any wire or ribbon, of any material, would be massively heavy all on its own and end up breaking under its own weight.

Not to mention sun, moisture, wind, airplanes.


23 posted on 02/22/2014 8:41:09 PM PST by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Ok, so the line gets cut what happens? Does it fly into space hitting satellites, like in the picture Gravity? There is so much crap up there, what havoc would it reek?


24 posted on 02/22/2014 8:45:45 PM PST by Empireoftheatom48 (God help the Republic but will he?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: lurk

I’ve seen experiments with carbon nanotubes. I don’t know how successful they were.


25 posted on 02/22/2014 8:47:07 PM PST by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
No. Next! Thanks ckilmer.
26 posted on 02/22/2014 8:49:15 PM PST by SunkenCiv (http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ArtDodger

“Arther C Clarke wrote a paper on this back in the 50s.”

Well, the idea he had before that - geosynchronous communications satellites - seems to have worked out OK...


27 posted on 02/22/2014 8:53:24 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lurk

Don forget giant robots piloted by some dudes with purple hair.


28 posted on 02/22/2014 8:53:42 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Screw the elevator. I want an escalator.


29 posted on 02/22/2014 8:59:29 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

The jet-streams.


30 posted on 02/22/2014 9:01:36 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

While I think this is technologically possible, I have heard that there are other techologies that are projected to be cheaper.


31 posted on 02/22/2014 9:02:40 PM PST by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Empireoftheatom48

Depends. Top portion will remain stationary or go UP. The bottom portion will collapse.
Problem is if they are cut at high enough altitude, up to about the mid-point, when the bottom portion will collapses there will be enough wrap around the Earth. A lot of it should burn up, or otherwise come apart, though.


32 posted on 02/22/2014 9:05:09 PM PST by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
"How does this promote NASAs mission to make Moslems feel good about themselves?"

When they blow it up their self-esteem will be enhanced.

33 posted on 02/22/2014 9:23:21 PM PST by Flag_This (Liberalism: Kills countries dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This

there is probably too much space junk and other things.


34 posted on 02/22/2014 9:27:00 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Only if the cable can be made of unobtanium which has sufficient tensile strength


35 posted on 02/22/2014 9:28:45 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
"People will laugh and ask why did we ever do space rockets…it's a dumb idea," Swan said.

I statement like that makes me want to dismiss this guy as a con artist or a kook.

36 posted on 02/22/2014 9:33:06 PM PST by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse

Test dumbies? Send thjeir best first with wife in tow.


37 posted on 02/22/2014 9:42:23 PM PST by mcshot (Their fraud is deep and unending...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lurk
would be massively heavy

If made out of carbon one foot in diameter, 18,193,470 tons. I suspect that carbon nanotube cable 1 foot in diameter couldn't even come close to supporting 18 million tons plus other stresses.

38 posted on 02/22/2014 9:48:04 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Bean stalk + Viagra = space elevator


39 posted on 02/22/2014 9:52:18 PM PST by Carthego delenda est
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Seems like something that massive would be affected by lunar cycles.


40 posted on 02/22/2014 10:10:50 PM PST by Crolis ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it." -GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson