Skip to comments.
Can Quiet, Efficient 'Space Elevators' Really Work?
space.com ^
| February 21, 2014 12:25 PM
| Leonard David
Posted on 02/22/2014 8:13:46 PM PST by ckilmer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: ckilmer
The idea should be advanced so that there are two ribbons that are in motion. One side going down, the other side going up. The tether would then be a pulley in space to provide the gravitational anchor.
This would allow the lifting power to be driven by the ground station and would allow for multiple “ups” and multiple “downs” at the same time.
To: ckilmer
He said back in 2003 that ten years after people stopped laughing about the space elevator work would begin on it. He thought that people had stopped laughing that yearMy bad. I giggled a little in 2008.
22
posted on
02/22/2014 8:41:08 PM PST
by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
To: ckilmer
62,000 miles of any wire or ribbon, of any material, would be massively heavy all on its own and end up breaking under its own weight.
Not to mention sun, moisture, wind, airplanes.
23
posted on
02/22/2014 8:41:09 PM PST
by
lurk
To: montag813
Ok, so the line gets cut what happens? Does it fly into space hitting satellites, like in the picture Gravity? There is so much crap up there, what havoc would it reek?
24
posted on
02/22/2014 8:45:45 PM PST
by
Empireoftheatom48
(God help the Republic but will he?)
To: lurk
I’ve seen experiments with carbon nanotubes. I don’t know how successful they were.
25
posted on
02/22/2014 8:47:07 PM PST
by
ckilmer
To: ckilmer; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
No. Next! Thanks ckilmer.
26
posted on
02/22/2014 8:49:15 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(http://www.freerepublic.com/~mestamachine/)
To: ArtDodger
“Arther C Clarke wrote a paper on this back in the 50s.”
Well, the idea he had before that - geosynchronous communications satellites - seems to have worked out OK...
27
posted on
02/22/2014 8:53:24 PM PST
by
The Antiyuppie
("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day.")
To: lurk
Don forget giant robots piloted by some dudes with purple hair.
28
posted on
02/22/2014 8:53:42 PM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: ckilmer
Screw the elevator. I want an escalator.
29
posted on
02/22/2014 8:59:29 PM PST
by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: ckilmer
30
posted on
02/22/2014 9:01:36 PM PST
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
To: ckilmer
While I think this is technologically possible, I have heard that there are other techologies that are projected to be cheaper.
To: Empireoftheatom48
Depends. Top portion will remain stationary or go UP. The bottom portion will collapse.
Problem is if they are cut at high enough altitude, up to about the mid-point, when the bottom portion will collapses there will be enough wrap around the Earth. A lot of it should burn up, or otherwise come apart, though.
32
posted on
02/22/2014 9:05:09 PM PST
by
Little Ray
(How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
"How does this promote NASAs mission to make Moslems feel good about themselves?" When they blow it up their self-esteem will be enhanced.
33
posted on
02/22/2014 9:23:21 PM PST
by
Flag_This
(Liberalism: Kills countries dead.)
To: Flag_This
there is probably too much space junk and other things.
34
posted on
02/22/2014 9:27:00 PM PST
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: ckilmer
Only if the cable can be made of unobtanium which has sufficient tensile strength
35
posted on
02/22/2014 9:28:45 PM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: ckilmer
"People will laugh and ask why did we ever do space rockets
it's a dumb idea," Swan said. I statement like that makes me want to dismiss this guy as a con artist or a kook.
36
posted on
02/22/2014 9:33:06 PM PST
by
Moonman62
(The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
Test dumbies? Send thjeir best first with wife in tow.
37
posted on
02/22/2014 9:42:23 PM PST
by
mcshot
(Their fraud is deep and unending...)
To: lurk
would be massively heavy If made out of carbon one foot in diameter, 18,193,470 tons. I suspect that carbon nanotube cable 1 foot in diameter couldn't even come close to supporting 18 million tons plus other stresses.
38
posted on
02/22/2014 9:48:04 PM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
To: ckilmer
Bean stalk + Viagra = space elevator
To: from occupied ga
Seems like something that massive would be affected by lunar cycles.
40
posted on
02/22/2014 10:10:50 PM PST
by
Crolis
("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it." -GKC)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson