Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to unveil manufacturing institutes in Detroit, Chicago [this reminds me of Solyndra]
yahoo.com/Reuters ^ | February 22, 2014 | Mark Felsenthal

Posted on 02/24/2014 8:40:13 PM PST by grundle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama will announce two new manufacturing institutes aimed at attracting and nurturing businesses that will hire workers for highly paid jobs in the United States, a White House official said on Saturday.

One institute, to be located in Detroit, will focus on lightweight and modern metals. The other, in Chicago, will concentrate on digital manufacturing and design technologies, the official said.

The Department of Defense will lead the effort with $140 million in government money. The president is due to make the announcement Tuesday, the official said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Detroit and Chicago supported Obama in both elections. This is his way of giving tax money to those who helped him to get elected. It reminds me of Solyndra:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3116541/posts

In 2009 the Obama administration gave $535 million to Solyndra, claiming that it would create 4,000 new jobs. However, instead of creating those 4,000 new jobs, the company went bankrupt. It was later revealed that the company’s shareholders and executives had made substantial donations to Obama’s campaign, that the company had spent a large sum of money on lobbying, and that Solyndra executives had had many meetings with White House officials.

It was also revealed that the Obama administration had already been aware of Solyndra’s financial troubles. For example, according to the company’s security filings in 2009, the company had been selling its product for less than the cost of production. In 2010, Obama visited the Solyndra factory and cited it as a role model for his stimulus program, saying “It’s here that companies like Solyndra are leading the way toward a brighter and more prosperous future.” The Washington Post wrote of this, “Administration officials and outside advisers warned that President Obama should consider dropping plans to visit a solar startup company in 2010 because its mounting financial problems might ultimately embarrass the White House.” Solyndra was a private company, but had been planning to use its government loans as a means of going public – so when Obama knowingly overstated the company’s condition in order to help his friends at Solyndra, he broke the same law that Martha Stewart had been sent to prison for breaking.

In September 2011, federal agents visited the homes of Brian Harrison, the company’s CEO, and Chris Gronet, the company’s founder, to examine computer files and documents. Also in September 2011, the U.S. Treasury Department launched an investigation.

On September 13, 2011, the Washington Post reported on emails which showed that the Obama administration had tried to rush federal reviewers to approve the loan so Vice President Joe Biden could announce it at a September 2009 groundbreaking for the company’s factory. The company was a hallmark of President Obama’s plan to support clean energy technologies.

The New York Times reported that government auditors and industry analysts had faulted the Obama administration for failing to properly evaluate the company’s business proposals, as well as for failing to take note of troubling signs which were already evident. In addition, Frank Rusco, a program director at the Government Accountability Office, had found that the preliminary loan approval had been granted before officials had completed the legally mandated evaluations of the company.

The New York Times quoted Shyam Mehta, a senior analyst at GTM Research, as saying “There was just too much misplaced zeal at the Department of Energy for this company.” Among 143 companies that had expressed an interest in getting a loan guarantee, Solyndra was the first one to get approval. During the period when Solyndra’s loan guarantee was under review, the company had spent nearly $1.8 million on lobbying. Tim Harris, the CEO of Solopower, a different solar panel company which had obtained a $197 million loan guarantee, told the New York Times that his company had never considered spending any money on lobbying, and that “It was made clear to us early in the process that that was clearly verboten… We were told that it was not only not helpful but it was not acceptable.”

The Washington Post reported that Solyndra had used some of the loan money to purchase new equipment which it never used, and then sold that new equipment, still in its plastic wrap, for pennies on the dollar. Former Solyndra engineer Lindsey Eastburn told the Washington Post, “After we got the loan guarantee, they were just spending money left and right… Because we were doing well, nobody cared. Because of that infusion of money, it made people sloppy.”

On September 29, 2011, the Washington Post reported that the Obama administration had continued to allow Solyndra to receive taxpayer money even after it had defaulted on its $535 million loan.

On October 7, 2011, The Washington Post reported that newly revealed emails showed that Energy Department officials had been warned that their plan to help Solyndra by restructuring the loan might be illegal, and should be cleared with the Justice Department first. However, Energy Department officials moved ahead with the restructuring anyway, with a new deal that would repay company investors before taxpayers if the company were to default. The emails showed concerns within the Obama administration about the legality of the Energy Department’s actions. In addition, an Energy Department stimulus adviser, Steve Spinner, had pushed for the loan, despite having recused himself because his wife’s law firm had done work for the company.

In January 2012, CBS News reported that Solyndra had thrown millions of dollars worth of brand new glass tubes into garbage dumpsters, where they ended up being shattered. Solyndra told CBS that it had conducted an exhaustive search for buyers of the glass tubes, and that no one had wanted them. However, CBS discovered that Solyndra had not offered the glass tubes for sale at either one of its two asset auctions that took place in 2011. In addition, David Lucky, a buyer and seller of such equipment, told CBS that he would have bought the tubes if he had had a chance to do so. Greg Smestad, a solar scientist who had consulted for the Department of Energy, also agreed that the tubes had value, and had asked Solyndra to donate any unwanted tubes to Santa Clara University. Smestad stated, “That really makes me sad… Those tubes represent intellectual investment. These could have had a better value to do public good. I think they owed the U.S. taxpayer that.”

In April 2012, CBS News reported that Solyndra had left a substantial amount of toxic waste at its abandoned facility in Milpitas, California.

Solyndra was not the only “green energy” company involved in this type of fraud. After Obama gave Raser Technologies $33 million to build a power plant, the company declared bankruptcy, and owed $1.5 million in back taxes. After Obama gave Abound Solar, Inc. a $400 million loan guarantee to build photovoltaic panel factories, the company halted production and laid off 180 employees. After Obama gave Beacon Power a $43 million loan guarantee to build green energy storage, the company filed for bankruptcy. After Obama approved $2.1 billion in loan guarantees for Solar Trust of America so it could build solar power plants, the company filed for bankruptcy.

Although Obama stated that all of the “green energy” companies that received taxpayer money were chosen “based solely on their merits,” the truth is that 71% of these grants and loans went to Obama donors and fundraisers, who raised $457,834 for his campaign, and were later approved for grants and loans totaling more than $11 billion. By November 2011, the Energy Department’s inspector general had begun more than 100 criminal investigations related to Obama’s stimulus. Although an “independent” review said that Obama had not done anything wrong, it was later reported that Herbert M. Allison Jr., the person who had conducted this “independent” review, donated $52,500 to Obama’s campaign.

1 posted on 02/24/2014 8:40:13 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: grundle

bump


2 posted on 02/24/2014 8:41:32 PM PST by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I’d like for someone to persuade me that our glorious leaders are better, more honest that Victor Yanukovich, and that there is a meaningful difference.


3 posted on 02/24/2014 8:45:09 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious! We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

140 million to go down the crapper shortly.


4 posted on 02/24/2014 8:46:38 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

what a joke

the residents of those cities are completely incompetent to do work like that


5 posted on 02/24/2014 8:51:02 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
 photo dggs3o.jpg
Please Help To Keep The
"Conservative News and Views"
on FR coming by "Clicking Here"!!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!


6 posted on 02/24/2014 8:56:36 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Mo Town and B.O. town.


7 posted on 02/24/2014 8:56:40 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
140 million to go down the crapper shortly.

This is only the beginning. Cornyn, McConnell and Boehner just gave Obama a blank check to reward all his cronies. There's no limit.

8 posted on 02/24/2014 8:59:43 PM PST by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grundle
The Department of Defense will lead the effort with $140 million in government money.

Obie taking money from the military to fund his Utopian Fantasies powered by unicorn gas.


9 posted on 02/24/2014 9:14:49 PM PST by Iron Munro (Eight died on that bridge at Concord, back in 1775. How many will it take this time?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

$140,000 on this while troop strength is cut. And no one mentions about those soldiers getting dumped into the job market where there are no jobs.


10 posted on 02/24/2014 9:24:46 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Makes you wonder how much DoD money is diverted for pet projects that have nothing to do with the military.


11 posted on 02/24/2014 9:27:28 PM PST by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

That’s not the point, to the redistributionists. The point is that they stole the money they’re going to throw down another black hole (after skimming it) , from productive working people and middle class people. If it helps to impoverish them, it’s momey well “spent”. They can’t control them as well if they are still mostly self-sufficient. They already control the leeches.


12 posted on 02/24/2014 10:55:08 PM PST by mrsmel (One Who Can See)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Yo, Obama! How about allowing the Keystone Pipeline to be built?
13 posted on 02/24/2014 11:25:57 PM PST by Chgogal (Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

......”The Department of Defense will lead the effort with $140 million in government money”......

They should call it what it is...140 million of OUR money.

Wouldn’t get real excited about the company in Detroit...anytime Obama “Unveils” something it goes broke!


14 posted on 02/24/2014 11:29:51 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: caww

More government bailouts of failed socialist cities/states.

Take money from producers and pour it down the rat holes that Marxism has created.


15 posted on 02/24/2014 11:58:23 PM PST by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: grundle
... aimed at attracting and nurturing businesses that will hire workers for highly paid jobs in the United States.

'Attracting' and 'nurturing' are two words that have no place in this behemoth of a government's lexicon.

It is patently disingenuous and arrogant to pretend they can do either on the one hand while simultaneously muffling, stifling, overtaxing, quashing, overregulating and oppressing business and industry on the other.

What government does is to provide a massive series of toll booths along the road from idea, innovation, production, marketing and sale to the customer.

This effort is likely just another disguise to funnel money to some hairbrained group that believes in Obama's plan for devolution.

16 posted on 02/25/2014 2:06:39 AM PST by Gaffer (Comprehensive Immigration Reform is just another name for Comprehensive Capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Manufacture what? Soylent Green?


17 posted on 02/25/2014 2:07:12 AM PST by Rodm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This is not a great sucking sound from across the border.....this is a HUGE flushing sound of taxpayer money down the crapper....again.

Odumbo...the Kenyan Neo-economist, what’s not good for America.


18 posted on 02/25/2014 3:59:54 AM PST by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eartick
What authority gives odumbo the right to arbitrarily give money for these projects? Does not the project, commonly known as 'pork", come attached to a Senate or House "bill" and EVENTUALLY get approved by the president?
19 posted on 02/25/2014 4:12:04 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rocky

....”Take money from producers and pour it down the rat holes”....

Won’t even give this administration the Marxism title...they’re just thugs and mobsters and haven’t a clue, nor care to Govern this country....it’s all about payoffs and money landering.

No matter what the politics at this juncture, it’s all about the money and moving it.....nothing more....then when they’re done they’ll walk away with the wealth they’ve stolen IMO.


20 posted on 02/25/2014 5:20:24 AM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson