Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At the Supreme Court, a royal mess for ‘King Barack’
The Washington Post ^ | 2-24-14 | Dana Milbank

Posted on 02/25/2014 1:06:18 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic

It has the makings of a royal mess for “King Barack.”

Monday morning’s Supreme Court argument about the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases went badly for the Obama administration — so much so that the real question before the justices seemed to be how severe the EPA’s loss would be.

The administration’s solicitor general, Donald Verrilli, pleaded with the justices to recognize the “urgent problem” of climate change, because the “threat to future generations gets worse” with each passing year.

But as the argument played out, the court’s swing justice, Anthony Kennedy, made clear that he agreed with the conservatives that the administration had gone too far in its carbon-dioxide regulations. Even some of the liberal justices voiced skepticism about the Justice Department’s position.

“I know litigants hate this question,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor told Verrilli. She asked which of two rationales he would prefer “if you were going to lose.”

“I knew you were going to ask me that question,” the solicitor general replied.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: co2; emissions; epa; epaoutofcontrol; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: afraidfortherepublic

Roberts will obey his lord and master.


41 posted on 02/25/2014 5:14:07 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenmcg

I don’t trust ‘em as far as I could throw ‘em.


42 posted on 02/25/2014 5:15:11 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

So now SCOTUS decides scientific issues too? Ridiculous.


43 posted on 02/25/2014 5:20:24 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

“Have the oceans truly risen? Anybody? Bueller?

Predictably they have, every six hours or so, but so far they have always receded.


44 posted on 02/25/2014 5:42:49 AM PST by billhilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
Okay, I'm curious. How does low, or no sunspots, translate into "no electricity"?

In case you haven't noticed...the Obama regime is busily shutting down coal powered and nuclear plants.....good luck getting much power from snow laden solar panels and frozen windmills.

45 posted on 02/25/2014 6:50:31 AM PST by spokeshave (OMG.......Schadenfreude overload is not covered under Obamacare :-()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Conspiracy Guy
I’d like to be optimistic. But when it comes to the SCOTUS actually getting it right it’s hard to be optimistic.

With our current Supreme Court and its' ruling on Obamacare it is now "Damn the Constitution! Anything goes!"

46 posted on 02/25/2014 7:12:50 AM PST by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AlexW
How did the 17th and 18th centuries combined last 400 years?

Did it just seem that long because no one had TV or the internet?

47 posted on 02/25/2014 7:20:24 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave

What do sunspots have to do with the production of of electricity vis a vis coal?


48 posted on 02/25/2014 7:26:26 AM PST by raybbr (Obamacare needs a death panel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

What is the SCOTUS even doing hearing this? The Congress should have clamped down on the EPA by defunding it long ago. The whole agency needs to be shut down.


49 posted on 02/25/2014 7:35:38 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

Exactly.


50 posted on 02/25/2014 10:58:09 AM PST by Conspiracy Guy (Did the ancients know they were ancients? Or did they see themselves as presents?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

Please, please, please legislate from the bench.

Sadly, it’s working for homosexual marriage.


51 posted on 02/25/2014 7:17:41 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic; Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

52 posted on 03/01/2014 1:58:58 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson