Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brewer Likely to Veto Anti-Gay Measure
NBCNews.com ^ | 02/25/2014 | Vaughn Hillyard

Posted on 02/25/2014 10:53:24 AM PST by GIdget2004

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer is likely to veto the state’s controversial measure that could allow businesses to refuse service to gay and lesbians due to religious beliefs, according to three people close to the governor and familiar with her thinking.

One of those is longtime Brewer political adviser Chuck Coughlin, who told NBC News: “It’s been her proclivity in the past to focus on the priorities she wants them [the legislature] to accomplish, and this was clearly not part of her agenda.”

“She doesn’t want to take any actions that could jeopardize the economic momentum we’ve seen here in Arizona,” said another person close to the governor.

The Republican governor is flying back to Phoenix on Tuesday after attending National Governors Association meetings this last week. Coughlin said she will meet with stakeholders on both sides on Wednesday and likely make her decision on Thursday or Friday. She has until Saturday morning to sign or veto the bill.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: arizona; az; brewer; cakebaking; gay; gayweddings; homosexualagenda; sodomy; veto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last
To: longtermmemmory
so now an attorney can be forced to draft a homosexual based pre-marriage contract?

Dunno. I can't say what sort of leeway attorneys have. As a Christian, I can think of a lot of problematical situations I could face as someone else's attorney. Glad I'm not one!
21 posted on 02/25/2014 11:19:23 AM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

there are who appartment bldgs which make it clear “normal not welcome”.

This is about forced participation in endorsing a BEHAVIOR.

It is not just about religion, it is also about conscience.

What if an atheist objects to homosexual conduct? Their conscience should not be violated either.


22 posted on 02/25/2014 11:19:25 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

He also said he wishes gays would stop going after businesses who do not want to deal with them because of religious beliefs.


23 posted on 02/25/2014 11:21:41 AM PST by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FReepers

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

24 posted on 02/25/2014 11:25:07 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

“Good. Not only is this statute absurdly unconstitutional, it WILL come back to bit we Christians in our collective a**es as it will be used against us in time.”

Explain what is unconstitutional about it? Nowhere in the Bill of Rights are sodomites protected against discrimination.


25 posted on 02/25/2014 11:27:32 AM PST by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Any veto will be construed by the homosexual left as tantamount as a statewide non-discrimination law enabling homosexuals to trample rights.


26 posted on 02/25/2014 11:27:40 AM PST by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Remember these so-called anti discrimination laws works both ways, Christian groups should start marching into gay bars, order a glass of water so they can’t be accused of loitering and hold a prayer meeting for a couple hours....


27 posted on 02/25/2014 11:32:42 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Brewer always talked the talk but never walked the walk. Typically RINO.


28 posted on 02/25/2014 11:36:31 AM PST by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Now that I've read the bill, I think it's a bad idea. As the law stands, businesses are permitted to refuse service for any reason that doesn't include race, religion and other categories protected by the civil rights laws. Under federal law and the laws of most states, sexual orientation is not one of the "forbidden grounds," so businesses should continue to take the position -- which I know is being challenged and recently was rejected by the New Mexico Supreme Court -- that refusal to provide services for gay weddings is within their rights.

The Arizona bill makes the exercise of this fundamental right contingent upon proving that a refusal to serve is based upon a sincerely held religious belief. This seems to limit, rather than expand, the rights that businesses already have.

Unfortunately, what we're seeing with the "you must serve gays" uproar is the culmination of the principle established in the 1964 civil rights act -- i.e., that private businesses may refuse service only when the State allows it.

29 posted on 02/25/2014 11:37:08 AM PST by jumpingcholla34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
freedom of association is not unconstitutional

But it is illegal in most places.

30 posted on 02/25/2014 11:38:36 AM PST by Count of Monte Fisto (The foundation of modern society is the denial of reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Count of Monte Fisto

is this real news or is it NBC making up to push the story and give cover? or is it homosexuals in government trying to push their worldview onto voters?


31 posted on 02/25/2014 11:40:56 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: NRA1995

It happens
I bought some fancy chocolates at a small chi chi type store.....and wrote a check
One week later, my check was returned because it had a verse of scripture printed on the check, and the owners (Gay.....but i didn’t know this at the time) didn’t want transactions of that type......
This was in my little hometown........the checks are lovely, pastels.....you have to take time to read them to see the verses.——I’ve been using them for years
Go figure


32 posted on 02/25/2014 11:40:57 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NRA1995

It happens
I bought some fancy chocolates at a small chi chi type store.....and wrote a check
One week later, my check was returned because it had a verse of scripture printed on the check, and the owners (Gay.....but i didn’t know this at the time) didn’t want transactions of that type......
This was in my little hometown........the checks are lovely, pastels.....you have to take time to read them to see the verses.——I’ve been using them for years
Go figure


33 posted on 02/25/2014 11:40:57 AM PST by Guenevere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jumpingcholla34

serving is far different than participate in their activities.

A baker will sell a generic cake. homosexuals want the baker to create a cake endorsing their sexual recreation.


34 posted on 02/25/2014 11:42:22 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Why is this “anti-gay?”


35 posted on 02/25/2014 11:44:24 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible traitors. Complicit in the destruction of our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever
...she is violating the principles of her faith and the Republican Party.

The GOP has principles? I know they used to but they still do? Funny, I haven't seen any evidence of that in years.

36 posted on 02/25/2014 11:47:18 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RIghtwardHo

Amen


37 posted on 02/25/2014 11:53:09 AM PST by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back
Why is this “anti-gay?”

The gays are against it.

38 posted on 02/25/2014 11:53:32 AM PST by Genoa (Starve the beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

It doesn’t surprise me at all, I figured it was happening.


39 posted on 02/25/2014 11:59:27 AM PST by NRA1995 (I'd rather be a living "gun culture" member than a dead anti-gun candy-ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever
she could be expelled from the GOP

LOL. The RINOs are more likely to expel the conservatives than vice versa.

40 posted on 02/25/2014 12:06:20 PM PST by Aqua Buddhist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson