[sickoflibs]

RE :”I agree with Impy that I'd sign the bill without a moment's hesitation and I'm surprised Brewer is feeling pressured by them. I'll be very disappointed if she caves on this.”

If I had to bet I would bet she veto's it.

I heard that she said that this bill was not part of her ‘agenda’ (Chuck Coughlin is claiming this)

Once again our good capitalist ‘job creators’ the corporations and C of C are threatening AZ.

Ironically a lib called CSPAN this morning complaining about how elected Republicans are owned by the corporations, and the Dem guest replied ‘Its not the corporations, its those rich guys....”

They are doing the gays bidding.

[BillyBoy]

>> I heard that she said that this bill was not part of her ‘agenda’ (Chuck Coughlin is claiming this) <<

Interestingly enough, I read an article that says the bill automatically becomes law after five days if she takes no action on it. (doesn't that result in a pocket veto at the federal level instead of the bill being enacted?)

So if she really wanted to, she could divorce herself of being associated with the bill and still let it pass anyway, by saying something like she personally wouldn't have voted for such legislation and won't sign this bill, but its her job to enforce the laws, not write them, so this is the law that the AZ legislature wants, it will remain in effect unless its found to be unconstitutional, blah blah blah.

Weasely solution, but it would take the heat off her.