Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Linder Letter: Republicans Need to Focus on Reagan Democrats (RE: Ted Cruz)
The Blaze ^ | February 28, 2014 | Former Rep. John Linder (R-Georgia)

Posted on 02/28/2014 9:29:20 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

I have enjoyed reading the many articles attacking Ted Cruz lately. They remind me of some happy times. I have seen this act before and when the curtain finally fell we were left with some wonderful memories.

Thirty-eight years ago Ronald Reagan announced that he would challenge President Ford for the Republican nomination for President. That excited me and I became one of his campaign leaders for Georgia.

Most of the friends I had in the party at that time made up the establishment. They were beside themselves with anger and fear. They were convinced that Reagan would destroy our party.

Their concern with Reagan was that he just wasn’t up to it. What did he know about foreign policy? How could he stand up to the Soviets? Did he understand Realpolitic? Does he have to be so dogmatic? He was just an actor for God’s sake!

During that campaign, as in all campaigns, the establishment sat on the stage at the head table and the rest of us milled around the small round tables below.

After Ford won the first several primaries, his people reached out to the Reagan side. They urged us to switch sides. They wanted to focus on Carter.

They were convinced that Ford could beat Carter and that Reagan could not. No one would take Reagan seriously. The conservatives in the media had a field day ridiculing the actor.

I remember a conversation I had with my friend who chaired the Ford campaign. After listening to his plea I said that, to me, politics is about what you believe. I knew what Reagan believed. If Ford had convictions I had no idea what they were. I urged him to watch Reagan connect with the people. New people were coming into the party every day. And these were not folks you might meet at the Club for lunch. They carried a lunch bucket to work. Or a brown paper bag.

Four years later we had the same fight. The establishment was with George Bush or John Connally or Howard Baker. Again, the Wall Street crowd sat at the head table and Main Street sat down below.

The arguments against a Reagan candidacy did not change. Reagan’s tax cut idea was a “riverboat gamble.” The insults from the chattering class were reconstituted. It was a never-ending series of put-downs until New Hampshire. Then it was over.

Reagan won that election with the support of Larry Lunch-bucket and Betty Brownbag. They were called Reagan Democrats. When asked why they chose to vote for Reagan they said, “When he talked we felt that he was talking to us.” The Reagan Democrats have been ignored since 1984. They are being ignored today.

The establishment doesn’t like change. They’re afraid that their seats at the head table will be taken by those new to the club. Those who so ardently opposed Reagan’s nomination in 1980 crawled all over each other to chair his 1984 race. The conservatives in the media were in awe. Today they have convinced themselves that they put Reagan in power. His presidency was their presidency. They are the keepers of the flame.

Today’s establishment includes elected officials and commentators. They genuflect before wealthy consultants who declare that you must be nice and poll your way to victory. Most important, do not take hard positions. Hard positions are easy for the media to ridicule. We don’t want to be embarrassed on the front page of The New York Times.

Larry Lunch-bucket and Betty Brownbag don’t read The New York Times. They really do want to know what you believe and how it will impact their lives. They want your positions to be hard positions. They want you to not only believe them, but to act on them. If they hear a choice they will vote. If they hear an echo they will just stay home. They have really important things to do.

Just ask President McCain or President Romney.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014; cruz; obama; tedcruz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

I don’t know how old you are, but back then the Reagan Democrats were part of the base.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Of course Reagan had the ‘good luck’ of following J Carter.
And, fortunately, Carter wasn’t smart enough to turn 47% of the population into ‘government dependents’.

BO got this going for him and definitely there are enough complete fools in the 53% to put him over the top.

I am ‘afraid’ we are going to have a MOOCH/BO ticket and we are going to end up with a Supreme Court that will make Ginsberg/etal look like Conservatives.

Picture the likes of Holder - Clinton (either) - and their minions sitting on the court....Or even set a precedent of the FIRST married couple on the court.

Of course by then if that gets elected, it won’t matter any more anyway.


21 posted on 02/28/2014 11:01:40 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 --When you have them by the short hairs, the minds and hearts soon follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Classic….


22 posted on 03/01/2014 2:02:54 AM PST by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

“Reagan Democrats are Republicans today. The rest are dead.”

Not true, in every swing state, turnout by white-working class males was way down. The Bain Capital ads broke any bond Romney might have developed with them. There’s lots of Reagan democrats; what makes them messy for the GOP-E is that they respond well to issues like illegal immigration, guns, abortion etc. Those issues send our GOP leaders in to a short period of hyperventilation after which they flee and speak darkly of the tea party conspiracy.

Fact is, you don’t talk to those voters effectively without the forbidden three isues.


23 posted on 03/01/2014 3:30:19 AM PST by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

My point seems to have been misunderstood. Those folks who were Democrats who voted for Reagan in 1980 and 1984, most of whom have long since already come over to the GOP. The older ones at the time have already largely died off. The “youngest” of those who were teens are already in their 50s.

What you’re talking about is leftist Willard trying to appeal to the Conservative White working class (many of whom are already Republicans, otherwise we wouldn’t have a majority in the House) and it falling on its face. I didn’t vote for Willard because he was a ringer for Zero, never going to win (I voted for Virgil Goode in the general).

The irony is that if we still had the same demographics and voters of 1980 and 1984, even the execrable Socialist Willard would’ve won, despite his being a faker.


24 posted on 03/01/2014 3:56:59 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I still have my old “John Linder For Congress” yard sign hanging on the wall in my basement.


25 posted on 03/01/2014 5:05:14 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

“I remember John Linder always as a conservative leader.”

Rep John Linder was my rep in the 7th Dist of GA for many years. I was a fine person and he always voted the right way. He also did a lot to promote the Fair Tax.


26 posted on 03/01/2014 7:12:12 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Larry Lunch-bucket and Betty Brownbag don’t read The New York Times... If they hear a choice they will vote. If they hear an echo they will just stay home.

Memo to the GOPe.

27 posted on 03/01/2014 7:58:33 AM PST by VRW Conspirator ( 2+2 = V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson