Posted on 03/06/2014 7:50:31 AM PST by SeekAndFind
We completed our most recent monthly McLaughlinOnline.com National Survey on February 13. In that poll of 1,000 likely voters, President Obama had a net negative job approval: 44 percent of voters approve and 54 percent disapprove. In almost all our recent polls since the Obamacare websites crash-and-burn rollout, the presidents job rating is usually identical to the level of voter disapproval for Obamacare.
Many Republican strategists now see this as a parallel dynamic similar to what the Iraq War issue did in 2006 to President Bushs job approval, costing the Republicans their Senate and House majorities. That year, Democrats for the House got 54 percent of the national vote. Heres what the 2006 national media post-election survey showed:
42 percent approved of the Iraq War and 56 percent disapproved.
If you disapproved of the war in Iraq, you voted for Democrats for Congress 8018.
If you disapproved of the job President Bush was doing, you voted for Democrats for Congress 8216.
The Democrats 2006 strategy was simple: Drive up the disapproval of the Iraq War, which drove up President Bushs disapproval, which drove up the vote for Democrats for Congress.
In theory, that same kind of strategy with Obamacare should expand the Republicans House majority and win the Senate this November.
Thats what Mitt Romneys campaign thought, in theory, about the economy, that it would be a silver-bullet issue to the exclusion of security and other issues. It didnt work.
It seems to be that the same kind of groupthink of Obamacare as a silver-bullet issue is dominating Republican strategists in 2014. Because of Obamacares woes, then, we wish the election were tomorrow, but its not.
With months to go this strategy seems too one dimensional. It severely underestimates the incumbent presidents and the Senate majoritys power to reset the agenda even as late as October.
Heres the real problem: As mentioned, in our recently completed February national poll President Obama had a 54 percent disapproval rating, but the generic ballot for Congress was only tied at 41 percent for Republicans and 41 percent for Democrats. Eighteen percent were undecided.
Among the undecideds for Congress, only 28 percent approve the job the president is doing, and 66 percent disapprove. In theory, by opposing President Obama, the Republicans have another twelve points available to them getting them to as much as 53 percent of the national vote for Congress.
However, heres a problem with the theory: In our poll 20 percent of all voters nationally disapprove of Obama but do not yet say theyll vote to elect Republicans to Congress. These voters will decide the November election.
Among those who disapprove of Obama but arent planning to vote GOP, fully 36 percent are still voting for a Democrat for Congress. The other 64 percent remain undecided.
In other words, opposition to Obama is not a silver bullet strategy.
So the Republican strategic class has some fundamental questions to ask: Who are these key swing voters? Why arent they voting for Republicans? How do Republicans persuade them to vote for them in November?
Here are some insights from our national poll about these Obama disapprovers who arent voting Republican:
They dont identify as Republicans. Only 7 percent are Republicans. Sixty percent are independents, but a full 30 percent are Democrats.
Theyre mostly not conservatives: Only 23 percent call themselves conservatives. A full 27 percent are liberals, and 51 percent are moderates.
They are more likely to be working class: The mean annual household income of voters in our poll was $60,000 in the swing group annual household income drops to $53,000. About half make less than $40,000 a year.
They are not, for the most part, the Christian Protestant vote that decides most Republican primaries. Twenty-nine percent are Catholics, 3 percent are Jewish, and 15 percent Atheist/agnostic. Of the 45 percent that are Protestants, only 46 percent are Evangelical Christians, adding up to only one-fifth of the total.
They are mostly white: 83 percent are white, 10 percent Hispanic, 5 percent African-American, and 2 percent Asian.
Theyre younger than the mean voter: Only 12 percent are seniors and 20 percent are under 30 years old and 67 percent are under 55.
Fifty-seven percent of them are women.
On the issues, most may disapprove of Obamacare, but they dont seem to know where Republicans are on other issues and may agree with Democrats on some important ones. The Republicans need to set a broader issue agenda, in other words, to win them over. Our findings on the issues (some of them from our January poll for our client the YG Network):
The majority strongly supports the idea, when asked, of cutting the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 25 percent to create jobs.
They dont seem to like welfare expansion: 5627, they say that they agree that Obama has massively expanded the welfare state.
74 percent favored raising the minimum wage to $10 an hour, but only 34 percent said that it would make their lives better.
62 percent said that it was more important to create economic growth to produce new jobs and pay raises for middle-class families than to raise the minimum wage.
66 percent thought that the states, not the federal government, should set the minimum wage.
63 percent said they preferred policies focused on economic growth rather than income inequality (33 percent preferred the latter).
It may be the same thinkers who told Mitt Romney to run only on the economy who are telling us that Obamacare is a silver bullet and thats all Republicans need. They blew it in 2012, dropping points on Benghazi, national security, and even the response to Hurricane Sandy. According to the RealClearPolitics average of national polls, Romney lost in the very last week.
Without a doubt, Republicans need to keep driving up the presidents disapproval by citing Obamacares failures, but they also need to do the same on his economic failures and even national-security issues (e.g., terrorism, the possibility of a nuclear Iran, defense cuts, and now the situation in Ukraine).
November is months away, but its likely that the Republicans need several bullets to win this election.
John McLaughlin and Jim McLaughlin are Republican strategists and partners in the national polling firm McLaughlin & Associates.
These political theories always look tidy on paper, but they never take into account the effect of a highly biased press and (increasingly) voter fraud. When a politician has an adoring, unskeptical press on his side, he can win an election with only 25% approval numbers.
“Obamacare Cant Be the GOPs 2014 Silver Bullet”
Yes it can. In fact obamacare is the Republican’s ONLY silver bullet, because it’s the ONLY direct, personal and tangible impact on individual lives as a consequence of Democrat policies. These personal, tangible impacts are simply undeniable by all the lies and propaganda of the Democrats and their propaganda organ, the kommie lapdog media.
All other issues besides obamacare are subject to “interpretation”, meaning subject to lies and propaganda. However, NOTHING can change the actual facts of losing your health insurance, losing your doctors and losing your access to medical care you had before obamacare, and NOTHING can change the actual fact that your health care costs have increased by hundreds of percent over your costs before obamacare.
Well, if you cherry pick your statistics you can lie about anything.
RE: 20 percent of all voters nationally disapprove of Obama
What do the other 80% say?
Longer version of first post:
“Obamacare Cant Be the GOPs 2014 Silver Bullet”
Yes it can. In fact obamacare is the Republican’s ONLY silver bullet, because obamacare is the ONLY policy that has had a personal and tangible impact on individual lives that is a DIRECT consequence of Democrat actions. These personal, tangible impacts are simply undeniable by all the lies and propaganda of the Democrats and their propaganda organ, the kommie lapdog media.
All other issues except for obamacare are subject to “interpretation”, meaning they are subject to lies and propaganda. However, NOTHING can change the actual facts of losing your health insurance, losing your doctors and losing your access to medical care you had before obamacare, and NOTHING can change the actual fact that your health care costs have increased by hundreds of percent over your costs before obamacare.
The Democrat politicians and their lapdog media can lie and spin all they want to, but none of that will change the horrific negative personal impact obamacare has had on each and every one of us on a daily basis. Personal health care is a life and death matter, and obamacare is killing us and we can all see that. Repealing obamacare is the ONLY issue any Republican candidate should be running on, and if Republicans can not win based on repealing obamacare they’ll never win another election because the voters are too ignorant and/or too stupid to vote for their own self-interest.
Kill it but will they vote republican?.
We have to focus on the economy. ObamaCare is bad because it kills jobs and prevents job creation. FedGov regulations are bad because they kill jobs. Lawless rule by decree is bad because the uncertainty kills jobs. We have to link everything worth discussing to jobs, and if there is no link, we need to ignore the topic this election.
Let me try to sum this up. When they have to write this convoluted of an article to explain how Obama’s disapproval rating plus Obamacare do not hurt democrats - they have a problem.
I agree. and the beauty of it is that the stench of Obamacare is on the hands of all the 'rats who voted it into being. It's not just about Obama.
I can write the anti Obamacare ads right now but I doubt the republican party can.
Example: Mom and Dad wrapping the kids’ presents under the tree on Christmas Eve. They sadly discuss how they couldn’t get the kids what they had hoped for this year, “but after we lost our coverage because of Obamacare and had to pay so much to get insured (or couldn’t get insured and had to pay so much in medical bills) and with my being laid off, I guess our kids will have to get used to more disappointments” A tear drops from Mom’s eye.
Voice over and text: “They made you pay, now make THEM pay at the polls. Vote the Democrat politicians out and vote Republican to restore America before it’s too late!”
I love your ad! Beef it up a flash of before and after monthly health insurance invoices. Maybe even use a real family with cost numbers.
Even longer version, with new ending paragraph:
“Obamacare Cant Be the GOPs 2014 Silver Bullet”
Yes it can. In fact obamacare is the Republican’s ONLY silver bullet, because obamacare is the ONLY policy that has had a personal and tangible impact on individual lives that is a DIRECT consequence of Democrat actions. These personal, tangible impacts are simply undeniable by all the lies and propaganda of the Democrats and their propaganda organ, the kommie lapdog media.
All other issues except for obamacare are subject to “interpretation”, meaning they are subject to lies and propaganda. However, NOTHING can change the actual facts of losing your health insurance, losing your doctors and losing your access to medical care you had before obamacare, and NOTHING can change the actual fact that your health care costs have increased by hundreds of percent over your costs before obamacare.
The Democrat politicians and their lapdog media can lie and spin all they want to, but none of that will change the horrific negative personal impact obamacare has had on each and every one of us on a daily basis. Personal health care is a life and death matter, and obamacare is killing us and we can all see that.
Repealing obamacare is the ONLY issue any Republican candidate should be running on. It is imperative that Republicans keep their message simple so the media cannot obfuscate and confuse the message. The simpler the message, the easier it is for the voters to understand the message and the more difficult it is for the media to spin it against the Republicans. So, obamacare: you’ve either voted for it or against it, and/or you’re either for repeal and replacement or you’re against repeal and replacement. It’s that simple. And if Republicans can not win based on repealing and replacing obamacare they’ll never win another election because they’ll never have another issue this powerful and because the voters will have demonstrated once and for all that they are too ignorant and/or too stupid to vote for their own self-interest, even when that self-interest is a matter of life and death.
Perhaps but any theme is going to be spun in a negative fashion by the other side. A theme of freedom will be spun as protecting special interests from reasonable regulation. I think that we are agreeing on one thing: the Republicans need to make the 2014 elections a referendum on Obama.
“I think that we are agreeing on one thing: the Republicans need to make the 2014 elections a referendum on Obama.”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Yes, but it won’t work unless we provide positive alternatives to his ruinous plans.
What I’d like to see is roughly 8 or 10 major issues addressed with a specific proposal for each issue, not unlike Newt’s Contract With America, which I thought was brilliantly conceived, but we didn’t have the stones to follow through. Get people talking about OUR agenda. Maybe call it Foundations of Freedom. Whatever. For example:
Taxes - eliminate the IRS. Flat tax, no loopholes. Maybe keep the charitable deduction and mortgage interest deduction.
Entitlements - privatize Soc Sec for anyone under 50, or even 45.
Healthcare - repeal AbominableCare. Eliminate all barriers to insurance competition. Encourage HSA’s. Remove all corporate deductions for employee health insurance.
Corporate Welfare - phase out 100% of it over four years, but lower corporate tax rates by a roughly equal aggregate amount.
Immigration - halt all illegal immigration, but encourage legal immigration.
etc, etc
Not saying these should be the exact specific proposals, but you get the idea. Keep it simple, but covering 10 issues makes it comprehensive and specific.
Unfortunately, I don't see anyone in leadership with the vision of Newt. The problem with current leadership is they would propose a "me, too, just not as much" agenda. We saw how well that worked in presidential election of 2012. Ted Cruz could lead this reform charge but the GOPe leadership would obstruct it in any non-public way they could and possibly publicly oppose it. There are too many in the party establishment who would rather have the Republicans stay out of power than to turn over the reigns to the conservatives.
Ironically, the Contract with America probably got clinton re-elected. With no real ideological moorings, billy jeff could take the CWA provisions, modify them some and claim them as his own.
bkmk
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.