This all hinges on the prior 9th circus ruling being upheld en banc. I hope it does but am wary of expecting rights to be upheld by the judiciary.
I am not sure about it depending on Peruta. The reason is that CA attorney general Kamala Harris said that under the current CA license procedure, each sheriff was independent in the way he could interpret the law.
I know some are planning to issue with the condition that Peruta stands. But others may not attach that condition. I know for sure, that each issued permit which is later rescinded will result in ~4 votes against that sheriff next election. Husband, wife, a few relatives, etc.
If the number of applications gets to be more than a small percentage of the population, a Sheriff may decide that issuing may be more in his interest than rescinding.