Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/07/2014 2:32:12 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: afraidfortherepublic
It's NOT the "Justice" Dept any more.....it's the "JUST US" Dept........ALL DEMOCRATS WILL BE PROTECTED FROM THE LAW!!!

Obama and the Democrats are LAW-LESS because Republican "leaders" are BALL-LESS!!!

We are losing ALL FAITH in "EQUAL UNDER THE LAW"!!!

2 posted on 03/07/2014 2:39:22 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion......the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
That’s raising questions among Republican lawmakers

Oh really?

4 posted on 03/07/2014 2:48:47 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I view it as a debriefing where she was instructed what to say.


5 posted on 03/07/2014 2:54:35 AM PST by Ray76 (How modern liberals think: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaE98w1KZ-c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Action verb lesson:

Republicans wonder...

Republicans question ...

DOJ declines ....

Pick the strongest verb?

6 posted on 03/07/2014 3:06:43 AM PST by Ramcat (Thank You American Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

7 posted on 03/07/2014 3:26:33 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

It’s real simple: hold her in Contempt of Congress, levy a penalty in the low 7-figures and throw her a** in jail. Then use the media firestorm to get all the information currently known out in front of the public. Including the fact that her 5th Amendment claim is bullsh*t, given that she didn’t invoke it when providing information to the DoJ.

My understanding of “Inherent Contempt” is that only the Chamber involved can do this. IOW the House can do this without the Senate concurring with the action.


8 posted on 03/07/2014 3:34:53 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Eric Holder personally nixed her testimony. Is there any further doubt?


10 posted on 03/07/2014 5:48:53 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

You know I have your records also.

11 posted on 03/07/2014 5:55:07 AM PST by McGruff (Don't worry. John Kerry is in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic
That’s raising questions among Republican lawmakers

Did we get PWND again?

12 posted on 03/07/2014 6:01:55 AM PST by Starstruck (If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

If the Republicans thought the Democrats were just going to let Lois sit quietly at home and contemplate her actions, then they really don’t know the Democrats.

“Understand yourself and understand your opponents and you will not be defeated in one hundred battles.”

The Democrats make their money looting the public treasuries. They justify their actions to themselves by convincing themselves that they are doing it for their family. They see opposition to them as an attack upon their family. It’s mental illness, but it is a great motivator for the Democrats.


13 posted on 03/07/2014 7:09:26 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: afraidfortherepublic

What the headline means to say is “Former IRS Official Lerner seeks cover from the DOJ”!


14 posted on 03/07/2014 7:55:08 AM PST by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson