“Romney was unelectable because he was a liberal.
If the GOP-E nominates another unelectable (liberal) candidate, expect to lose again.”
Romney lost because 3 million whiteys sat on their duffs and didn’t bother to vote, a good percentage of them undoubtedly purists like you. Twist words all you want, you are still a political naive foolish person.
If you want to win, you need to push for a conservative candidate.
/johnny
Your candidate was unelectable. If you nominate another liberal, those 3 million will not vote again. Those votes are yours to lose.
/johnny
The politically naive and foolish person is one that thinks they can browbeat 3 million conservatives into voting for a liberal, when they have PROVED that they won't.
Accept reality, and understand we won't vote for your liberal republican candidates anymore.
/johnny
I will bet that most of the 3 million people would take an "impure" republican over a liberal like Romney any day.
The real purists are the liberals in the republican party who abandoned candidates like Ken Cuccinelli in Virginia.
Politically naive is foisting a left wing liberal candidate on a conservative base.
Politically naive is thinking that you can bully, browbeat, guilt-trip, and blackmail people into voting for a distasteful candidate.
Foolish is trying to do that over and over again, and then blaming the voters, when you don't succeed.
Romney lost because when people who like big government handing them goodies have a choice between a real Democrat and Democrat-lite, they pick the real ‘rat every time.