Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Molon Labe: Connecticut’s Terrifying Start Of Gun Confiscation
Townhall.com ^ | March 10, 2014 | Rachel Alexander

Posted on 03/10/2014 8:28:17 AM PDT by Kaslin

>The latest gun control law in Connecticut has crossed a very frightening line. A standoff has been created between the government and tens of thousands of gun owners now considered felons. It marks the beginning of an Orwellian new phase. Gun owners saw it coming, as evidenced by their recent adoption in recent years of the defiant expression “molon labe.” The phrase originated from Spartan General-King Leonidas, who reportedly responded with “Come and get them!” to Persian Emperor Xerxes’ demand that the Spartans surrender their weapons at the Battle of Thermopylae. The Spartans fought valiantly, but were ultimately defeated. With the prequel to the Hollywood bestselling movie 300 just released last week, Americans are now even more aware of the phrase.

Until now, gun control laws hadn’t mandated the confiscation of weapons; generally, banned guns were grandfathered in under previous laws so their current owners could continue to legally own them. The Connecticut law changes all that. Passed last year in response to the Sandy Hook shooting, SB 1160 bans so-called “assault weapons” - certain rifles, more recently known as AR-15s, that have been singled out based on purely cosmetic criteria - and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

The firearms have been banned based on how “scary” they look, not their actual usage in crimes. According to a study from the BATF that came out a few years ago, none of the top 10 guns used in crimes in the U.S. were so-called assault weapons; they were all pistols or revolvers. In fact, the #5 gun used in crimes was a shotgun, which Vice President Joe Biden advised Americans last year to use for self-defense.

The only way to legally retain one of these newly banned firearms or magazines in Connecticut now is to register it - but most gun owners do not want their name on a government list. They are well aware that a list of gun owners can someday be used by the government for confiscation. If gun owners didn’t register their firearms or magazines prior to the December 31, 2013 deadline mandated by the legislation, their firearms will be subject to confiscation and the owners considered guilty of a felony.

So far, it appears that the vast majority of gun owners affected by the legislation did not register their guns prior to the December 31 deadline, making between 50,000 and 350,000 gun owners felons. This is frightening, considering the law doesn’t just make the violation a misdemeanor, it makes it a felony, which could result in a prison sentence. Fewer than 50,000 gun owners registered their firearms by the deadline to comply with the law.

Gun owners who sent in their applications for registration after the deadline have reported already receiving letters by the government instructing them to get rid of their guns. The Hartford Courant notes that the government has records of gun owners who went through background checks in order to purchase AR-15s. The government could potentially go after any of those gun owners who failed to register their guns.

There is shock that gun owners are showing defiance. "I honestly thought from my own standpoint that the vast majority would register," said Sen. Tony Guglielmo, R-Stafford, the ranking GOP senator on the legislature's public safety committee. "If you pass laws that people have no respect for and they don't follow them, then you have a real problem."

On January 30, Federal District Court judge Alfred V. Covello upheld the law in Shew v. Malloy. While he admitted that it placed a substantial burden on the Second Amendment, he claimed that it “substantially related to the important governmental interest of public safety and crime control.” It is astonishing that a judge would use that as justification, considering even Congress sunsetted the federal assault weapons ban due to a lack of evidence showing it was effective.

Many judges come up with rulings based on their personal political views, or are pressured into a certain decision by outside special interests. Judicial activism is nothing new. Judicial activists have successfully forced a tortured, restricted interpretation of the Second Amendment over the years, in order to diminish its validity. Covello’s disappointing decision is currently being appealed, backed by the powerful NRA.

Trying to prosecute 50,000 to 350,000 gun owners would be insanity. The liberal activist politicians who passed the foolish legislation in response to an emotional response to the Sandy Hook Shooting do not represent the will of the people who elected them, who want the Constitution upheld. In many ways, the Second Amendment is our most important right, because without it, we cannot protect any of our other rights. There is a reason why it is the Second Amendment, not the 30th Amendment.

Requiring gun owners to register their firearms puts them on a fast track with sex offenders, who are required to register with the government so they can be monitored for the rest of their lives. If gun owners fail to register for tracking, they are then treated like criminals, just like sex offenders. This is bizarre, considering lawful gun owners are merely patriotic Americans concerned about protecting their cherished rights. AR-15s aren’t guns used in crimes, but are popular guns for self-defense and target shooting.

Connecticut Carry, a leading gun rights organization in the state, is daring the government to come after gun owners. The stage is being set for massive civil disobedience unless the law is changed. Many prosecutors and law enforcement officers are not going to uphold a law this heavy-handed; nevertheless, this ill-conceived legislation, pushed through by gun-control activists, is going to pit many law-abiding law enforcement officers against thousands of patriotic, American freedom-loving gun owners. It is terrifying that here in America, innocent gun owners would be put in the same category as sex offenders, turning them into felons. Connecticut governor Dannel Malloy (D), who signed SB 1160, seems to have become another King Xerxes. This time around, will the Spartans in Connecticut prevail?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: alfredcovello; banglist; civilwar2; civilwarii; confrontationwatch; cw2; cwii; donutwatch; feos; guncontrol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last
To: Westbrook
Why is this IDIOT “shocked” about people refusing to obey an UNLAWFUL act

He's shocked because he is a servile well behaved east coast republican.

141 posted on 03/10/2014 4:17:15 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
Fourth Amendment.
142 posted on 03/10/2014 4:19:35 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg

That portion of the 4473 is filled out for the FFL’s records after the purchase has been approved by NICS. Unless the Feds get the 4437, they do not have that information.


143 posted on 03/10/2014 4:23:46 PM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
The Founding Fathers exhausted all avenues of nonviolent appeal before finally determining that a severance of ties was necessary. It would be advisable that latter day firebrands do the same.
144 posted on 03/10/2014 4:30:10 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER
ROCKLOBSTER said: "The US Constitution applies to the federal government."

Much of the Bill of Rights, which is part of the US Constitution, has been applied against the states since the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868 shortly after the end of the Civil War.

The Second Amendment was ruled by the Supreme Court to apply against the states in the McDonald decision in 2010. Any gun laws in effect in the states which infringe the right to keep and bear arms are void and unenforceable.

From a practical standpoint, of course, many of these laws will have to be challenged and appealed in order to have them explicitly declared unconstitutional.

145 posted on 03/10/2014 4:36:43 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
Probably depends on their state Constitutions.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

146 posted on 03/10/2014 4:41:17 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Sorry, but if ANY state mandated that soldiers be housed by the citizens, that would be challenged and overturned by SCOTUS. Not a chance in hell of that law standing.


147 posted on 03/10/2014 4:57:51 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA (When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

The SCOTUS!!

You mean the ones that ruled in favor of ObamaCare, McCain/Feingold CFR, Kelo, Baby-killing?

What do they know about the Constitution?

There are over 6000 languages in the world, if the Supreme Court has been charged with “Intrepreting the Constitution”...then they’d better get crackin’.

Otherwise they are to be the final word on all cases arising “under this Constitution” and not just making it up as they go along.

We need a serious review and reboot of SC “Constitutional” rulings.


148 posted on 03/10/2014 5:19:51 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
[Art.] Trying to prosecute 50,000 to 350,000 gun owners would be insanity.

Really? Not even if :

Not even if that's what is on Obama's plate?

149 posted on 03/10/2014 5:24:05 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

Love your last line — I’m sure some Texan will be along shortly to claim it as a sigline.


150 posted on 03/10/2014 8:13:38 PM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

Follow the bouncing ball, sugar.


151 posted on 03/10/2014 8:55:31 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (If you can read this, you are part of the resistance. Or some scum sucking kapo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

It’s time for decent townsfolk make this jack boot’s life very, very uncomfortable. In every possible way.


152 posted on 03/10/2014 9:05:30 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 144

Is that some kind of “dyslexic” joke? (A dyslexic walks into a bra)


153 posted on 03/11/2014 2:51:10 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves" Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

I think it’s obvious that Conn. has tried to shut the whole state into a rubber room and the chaotic consequences are following.

Connecticutters (Connecticuttians?) finally said, enough.


154 posted on 03/11/2014 2:57:17 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

“The Left will pick and choose and select easy targets to intimidate the rest of non-compliers.”


No intelligent individual would take on such a futile task.


155 posted on 03/11/2014 8:25:26 PM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ourworldawry

But Obama’s brown shirt militia would; and that militia is comprised of, among others, of the overly militarized, Federally funded, MRAP equipped local police forces.


156 posted on 03/12/2014 2:22:00 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

“But Obama’s brown shirt militia would; and that militia is comprised of, among others, of the overly militarized, Federally funded, MRAP equipped local police forces.”


Sure they would. But, like I said....No intelligent individual would take on such a futile task.


157 posted on 03/12/2014 10:44:28 AM PDT by ourworldawry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson