Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Marcellus Shale Gas Production Nearing a Peak?
fool.com ^ | March 9, 2014 | Arjun Sreekumar

Posted on 03/10/2014 9:02:24 PM PDT by ckilmer

 

Is Marcellus Shale Gas Production Nearing a Peak?

By Arjun Sreekumar | More Articles | Save For Later
March 9, 2014 | Comments (0)

Natural gas industry observers will attest that growth in gas production from Pennsylvania's Marcellus shale has surpassed even the most optimistic of projections. And, according to a new report by a prominent investment research firm, Marcellus production growth won't be peaking anytime soon. Let's take a closer look.

Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The rapid growth in Marcellus gas production
Last year, natural gas output from the Marcellus surged 61% year over year to average 10.4 billion cubic feet per day, according  to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. This phenomenal growth is thanks largely to major efficiency improvements resulting from a shift toward multi-well pad drilling, which allows energy producers to drill more wells from existing pads.

Not surprisingly, Marcellus-focused gas producers have delivered staggering year-over-year gains in production. For instance, Cabot Oil & Gas (NYSE: COG  ) reported fourth-quarter net Marcellus production of 1,171 million cubic feet per day, up 67% from the previous year's fourth quarter, while Range Resources (NYSE: RRC  ) grew its 2013 Marcellus production by 37% year over year, which helped fuel 25% growth in adjusted cash flow.

Similarly, Chesapeake Energy's (NYSE: CHK  ) fourth-quarter production from the northern Marcellus grew 36% year over year and 7% sequentially to approximately 880 million cubic feet of gas equivalent per day, while CONSOL Energy (NYSE: CNX  ) saw 56% year-over-year growth in fourth-quarter Marcellus production, as the company continues to make progress in its transition from coal to gas.

One of the main reasons these energy companies continue to drill in the Marcellus is because they can generate phenomenal returns even with relatively low gas prices. Cabot, for instance, can now generate pre-tax returns in excess of 100% at a wellhead gas price of only $3.00 per MMBtu, while Range and Chesapeake can earn triple-digit returns with $4.00 per MMBtu gas at the wellhead.

The future of the Marcellus
With these kinds of returns at such low gas prices, it's no wonder that these companies continue to drill heavily in the play. And if gas prices rise further, low-cost producers such as Cabot, Range, and Chesapeake will likely allocate additional capital toward the Marcellus.

As arguably the most economical gas play in the country, the Marcellus should see high levels of activity for a long, long time that should continue to drive robust production growth. According to a recent report by investment research firm Morningstar, Marcellus output will grow by a whopping 3 billion cubic feet per day this year and by another 2 billion cubic feet per day in 2015.

In addition to the play's attractive economics, some of the other principal factors expected to drive this growth include the play's high initial production rates, relatively shallow well decline rates, continued efficiency improvements from the application of new technologies, and energy producers' focus on the most productive zones of the play.

Based on an assessment of initial production rates, decline rates, and drilling and completion activity for almost 5,500 Marcellus wells in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, Morningstar concluded that Marcellus gross production will reach 14 to 20 billion cubic feet per day by the end of 2015. If achieved, that level of output would represent nearly a quarter of domestic gas production, up from about a fifth currently.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: cabot; marcellus; shalegas

1 posted on 03/10/2014 9:02:24 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney; SunkenCiv

fyi


2 posted on 03/10/2014 9:02:57 PM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Who knew that releasing gas was a “Good Thing”?


3 posted on 03/10/2014 9:09:08 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

We’ve just scratched the surface, so to speak. The only things holding back production are the lack of gathering line infrastructure and pricing. When an export market opens up, it will go crazy.


4 posted on 03/11/2014 2:55:54 AM PDT by SargeK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SargeK

How would that help gays, Muslims and communists? Ergo, it won’t happen.


5 posted on 03/11/2014 3:25:41 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks ckilmer.


6 posted on 03/11/2014 3:49:14 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
Last year, natural gas output from the Marcellus surged 61% year over year to average 10.4 billion cubic feet per day

It is now 14.8 bcf/d.

Marcellus - March 2014
Drilling Productivity Report
http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/marcellus.pdf

7 posted on 03/11/2014 4:58:04 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

That’s quite a growth curve.


8 posted on 03/11/2014 7:49:41 AM PDT by ckilmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson