Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoConPubbie; Jim Robinson
Mr. Jim Robinson's words are all I need to know:

Therefore, we wholeheartedly support the Bush Doctrine of pre-emptive strikes on known terrorist states and organizations that are believed to present a clear threat to our freedom or national security. We support our military, our troops and our Commander-in-Chief and we oppose turning control of our government back over to the liberals and socialists who favor appeasement, weakness, and subserviency. We do not believe in surrendering to the terrorists as France, Germany, Russia and Spain have done and as Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton and the Democrats, et al, are proposing.

Go Ted go! Go Jim go!

3 posted on 03/11/2014 7:17:33 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: re_nortex

Would love to hear JR’s position on pre-emptively attacking Iran for their terrorist funding and the national security threat they possess.


11 posted on 03/11/2014 7:33:35 PM PDT by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: re_nortex

There is ocean size difference between going after terrorists with special units such as the Navy Seals and starting wars with sovereign nations without conclusive evidence of WMD’s. For example spending 2 Trillion dollars borrowed from China and Japan to attack Iraq was an ocean size folly. A country with debt bigger than GDP has no business protecting oil supplies to China and Japan from middle-east with borrowed money from China and Japan. It is plain stupid.


20 posted on 03/11/2014 7:56:32 PM PDT by entropy12 (If you did not vote, you helped elect the community organizer from south side of Chicago.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson