Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA Gun Store Owner Refuses to Give Feds Customer List (ATF Seeks Buyers of AR-15 Lower Receivers)
Fox 5 San Diego ^ | March 12, 2014 | Misha DiBono

Posted on 03/13/2014 7:42:46 PM PDT by DogByte6RER

AR 15 lower receiver photo: Assembled Lower Receiver AR_Build_01_001.jpg

Gun store owner refuses to give feds customer list

OCEANSIDE, Calif. – The owner of an Oceanside store that sells various gun parts to build a rifle from scratch refused to turn over his customer list to federal agents.

Dimitrios Karras, owner of Ares Armor, said the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents were investigating their business, not for what they sell, but for the people who purchase their products.

Karras said the ATF threatened to shutter their business if they didn’t hand over the names of 5,000 customers who have purchased an 80 percent lower receiver (the base) for building an AR-15.

It is legal to build a rifle from scratch without serial numbers only if the base is manufactured to ATF specifications. The base is not considered a firearm if it’s sold separately.

(Excerpt) Read more at fox5sandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: 80percentlower; ar15; aresarmor; atf; banglist; eparmory; gunsandammo; lowerreceiver; oceanside; privacy
custom ar 15 photo: m4 A4.gif PING for custom AR 15s
1 posted on 03/13/2014 7:42:46 PM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

“It is legal to build a rifle from scratch without serial numbers only if the base is manufactured to ATF specifications. The base is not considered a firearm if it’s sold separately.”

Bad reporting.

An 80% lower is a hunk of metal that is worked to be almost an AR-15. It requires a bit more work and is considered a homemade firearm which means it can never be sold, only willed.

Short but way more accurate than that blurb.


2 posted on 03/13/2014 7:54:01 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

Do the full auto rules still aplly?


3 posted on 03/13/2014 7:56:57 PM PDT by RC one (Militarized law enforcement is just a nice way of saying martial law enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RC one

“Do the full auto rules still aplly?”

That depends on where you live. There are conflicting court decisions.


4 posted on 03/13/2014 7:59:48 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RC one

NFA rules apply. All you’re doing by working the receiver is just making a non-transferable firearm that the gov’t doesn’t know anything about.

It looks like this is a classic case of gov’t over-reach after this- http://www.guns.com/2014/02/27/california-gun-parts-maker-assault-city-sign/

The city complains about their signage and suddenly the ATF shows up days later demanding things? Welcome to Obama’s America.


5 posted on 03/13/2014 8:00:27 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Pure thuggery by the ATF.


6 posted on 03/13/2014 8:01:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

I’ll take one of each!


7 posted on 03/13/2014 8:02:47 PM PDT by Doomonyou (Let them eat Lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

If it’s not a serialized firearm, how would there be any records of who bought what, especially if a person paid cash for it?


8 posted on 03/13/2014 8:06:59 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

They don’t give a damn about the receivers. They want the names for the database they are building in anticipation of the time when some of the American people say “enough”.

The Feds are pressuring the states to hand over their CCDW lists. Which they have no authority to ask for. Instructor in my CCDW class said they had been trying to get the names from Kentucky.

They are expecting some serious dissent and they are preparing to come down on the “non-compliant” citizens when it happens. This is not going to end well.


9 posted on 03/13/2014 8:12:07 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s ((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

“Karras’s attorney informed the ATF to pick up the receivers Wednesday morning at their Oceanside location, but the inventory was not the issue. The store owner said he will not comply with turning over their private client list.”

Karras’ attorney is his partner in the business. There is a 45 minute video about their dealings with the city of National City over their satellite business location signage. If they’ve sold 5,000 80% lowers, there are probably 200,000 80% lowers out there, because there are dozens of businesses selling them. I guess the ATF is trying to get the plastic one’s because they claim that they are not in reality 80%, but rather finished parts that have had some of the features plugged with another color of plastic.


10 posted on 03/13/2014 8:12:49 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s; All

Speaker John Boehner is shirking his Constitutional Duty by not issuing Articles of Impeachment for B. Hussein Obama.

Removal from Office by the US Senate can ONLY be accomplished AFTER a perp. is Impeached by the US House.

The House is the Police, and the Senate is the Judge and Jury.

First the House must Impeach the POS.

Then the Senate determines if the Impeached POS should be removed from office.

Most FReepers fall in the all or nothing camp and only want a clear path to removal.

Our Constitution makes it very clear: Impeach first by the House, and then have the Senate decide on Removal.

The objective is to punish all those who violate their sacred oaths to defend the US Constitution.

A bi-weekly Impeachment of B. Hussein Obama would be needed to punish him for all of his Constitutional violations over the last 5 years, but I will be satisfied with just one Impeachment.

Obama’s Removal from Office by the US Senate would be good for America, but Reid’s Senate has not yet demonstrated any interest in what is good for America.

Since the RINOs have control of the US House of Representatives in 2014, 2014 is the last year that we can be certain that Obama could be Impeached.

The RINOs assume that they will maintain control of the US House, but their usual desire to lose to Democrats is so strong, that their assumption may not be a valid one.

Impeach B. Hussein Soetoro-Obama in 2014, PERIOD.


11 posted on 03/13/2014 8:14:27 PM PDT by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

“Pure thuggery by the ATF.” no, they wouldn’t do that, its for the children.


12 posted on 03/13/2014 8:16:17 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

“They are expecting some serious dissent” I believe you are correct. Too bad they forget upon which this nation was founded - the shot heard round the world. When our government (King George) wanted to take away our guns, and we said no.


13 posted on 03/13/2014 8:16:17 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Fully automatic is legal on the reservation -

ATF never bother`n the Mohawks cuz they know they will have another scalpin` war as they did few years back here and in Canada.

One law for Mohawks and other crap for us`n coz the Mohawks take no sht from nobody.

Their 1795 treaties are backed up by machine guns.-

Our 1789 constitution ditto.

.


14 posted on 03/13/2014 8:17:41 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 ("The Second Amendment has no limits on firepower"-NY State Senator Kathleen A. Marchione.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

They don’t care specifically which one that you bought.

They want the names so they can send them threatening letters saying that they purchased an illegal gun, they have proof, and if you don’t surrender it they will take you to jail.


15 posted on 03/13/2014 8:19:37 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

-
http://aresarmor.com/store/
-
http://aresarmor.com/store/Item/TACMHL15
Our 80 Percent anodized AR-15 lower receiver
is our standard 80 AR-15 lower receiver
with mil-spec hard coat anodizing.
Buy 1-19: $90.00 Each
Buy 20-99: $82.00 Each
Buy 100+: $70.00 Each
Stock Info: 333 In Stock
-
http://aresarmor.com/store/NewsArticle/Temporary_Restraining_Order_Against_BATFE

TO: Whom It May Concern
FROM: Dimitrios Karras, CEO Ares Armor
SUBJ: Temporary Restraining Order Against BATFE
DATE: March 12, 2014

Sir or Ma’am,
Last week the BATFE Raided EP Armory based on a determination letter that had deemed the 80% Polymer product to be a firearm. The determination letter that the BATFE used to obtain warrants against EP Armory is based on incorrect information about the manufacturing process. The BATFE has been notified of their error and the incorrectness of their determination based on this error.

This week on Monday, March 10th the BATFE threatened to raid us even though they are fully aware that their determination letter is factually incorrect. They requested that we turn over a list of every customer that had purchased a polymer lower from us and turn over the remaining inventory that we have.

Our customer’s privacy is of the utmost importance to us. I cannot in good moral conscience turn over a list of names to the BATFE just because they unduly threaten us with an unjust raid based on information they KNOW TO BE FALSE!

For the time we are SAFE! We were granted a Temporary Restraining Order against the BATFE on March 11th. The following is the declaration that I made during the process of obtaining this TRO:

Declaration of Dimitrios Karras, CEO Ares Armor
In regards to the events surrounding Ares Armor’s interaction with EP Armory’s products and the threats made towards Ares Armor by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (BATFE.) The following declarations are true and correct to the best of my knowledge.

I, Dimitrios Karras, state:
1. During a meeting with the BATFE around the end of 2012 that was unrelated to EP Armory’s product, the Agent that was present very strongly requested that I turn over Ares Armor’s customer list. He intimidated me with the possibility of criminal charges if he was not satisfied. This was the first attempt the BATFE made to intimidate Ares Armor into turning over private customer information.

2. An 80% lower is an industry term for an unfinished receiver that is not considered to be a firearm.

3. EP Armory manufactures an 80% lower receiver made from polymer.

4. Ares Armor purchases and then resells many products one of which is the 80% Polymer Lowers that are made by EP Armory.

5. In the regular course of business I have seen many different 80% AR-15 receivers.

6. EP Armory’s product is no different than standard 80% receivers that are sold openly and that the BATFE has consistently determined to not be a firearm. EP Armory’s product is in compliance with previous BATFE Determinations and is not a firearm.

7. The BATFE has Raided EP Armory based on incorrect information about EP Armory’s manufacturing process. The determination letter written by the BATFE incorrectly classified the EP Armory product as a firearm based on faulty information. The BATFE was under the impression that EP Armory was making a firearm and then reverting back to the 80% stage by filling in the fire-control cavity. At no point during the manufacturing process by EP Armory is a weapon made and then reverted. The solid fire-control cavity is built first and the rest of the 80% casting is made around this “core” specifically so that their product at no time could be considered to be a firearm.

a. As can be seen in Exhibit 1-3. The BATFE has consistently determined that the machining operations that cannot be performed in order to not be considered a firearm are as follows:
1. Milling out of fire-control cavity.
2. Selector-lever hole drilled.
3. Cutting of trigger slot.
4. Drilling of trigger pin hole.
5. Drilling of hammer pin hole.

b. EP Armory’s product is consistent with the BATFE’s many previous determinations.

c. At no time during EP Armory’s manufacturing process are any of the aforementioned 5 operations in a state that could cause a reasonable person to believe that EP Armory’s product would be considered a firearm.

8. The BATFE has been appropriately informed of their mistake. However, even though they have no determination that is based on fact, they are knowingly using their fiction based determination to intimidate Ares Armor with threats in order to inappropriately gain access to information that is private and should be protected.

9. I received communication on or about 3/10/2014 from our legal counsel (Jason Davis) that the BATFE was in the process of obtaining a warrant against Ares Armor based on their incorrect determination of EP Armory’s Product. I was advised that the BATFE had offered to forego obtaining a warrant if Ares Armor was willing to:
a. Hand over all of EP Armory’s 80% Lowers.
b. Turn over Ares Armor customer’s private information to the BATFE.

In exchange for turning over our customer’s private information the BATFE said that they would not “raid” Ares Armor’s facilities and would not pursue “criminal” charges. This made me feel as if I was being extorted. I agreed to their terms in order to delay an impending and unjust raid against Ares Armor long enough to obtain legal protection under the law.

10. I have been unjustly threatened with raids and criminal charges in an attempt by the BATFE to obtain information that is private and protected. The BATFE has expressed interest in obtaining Ares Armor’s customer list in the past and is now attempting to strong-arm us with undue threats based on information they know to be incorrect.

11. I am now in constant fear for the safety of my employees, my customers and myself.

Executed March 10, 2014 Oceanside, CA
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Dimitrios Karras


16 posted on 03/13/2014 8:25:49 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Ping


17 posted on 03/13/2014 8:28:52 PM PDT by HammerT (The Commonsense civil right of Armed Self-defense [CASD], its the law of the land.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Democrat fascism in action.


18 posted on 03/13/2014 8:35:58 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

It’s not an illegal gun.


19 posted on 03/13/2014 8:36:04 PM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Our local gun shop told my husband during the last annual inspection they had a list of specific customers they were asking about.


20 posted on 03/13/2014 8:37:59 PM PDT by call meVeronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

We all know this. The ATF doesn’t like others to know this.

It’s sorta how they work. Intimidation.


21 posted on 03/13/2014 8:47:59 PM PDT by Bogey78O (We had a good run. Coulda been great still.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

I keep wondering if DHS and local cops are willing to die on orders from an illegal alien with 7 stolen SSNs and a forged Hawaii birth certificate.


22 posted on 03/13/2014 9:00:24 PM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ForYourChildren

In any civil war, this whole ‘gun registration’ crap lasts approx 2 weeks until enough Brownshirts get killed and citizens take THEIR guns off the dead bodies.

At that point, tracing the typical M4 used by the Resistance only leads back to DHS or whoever issued the gun to their rank-and-file Brownshirt.

The danger of registration is the islamo-commie illegitimate govt grabbing the guns BEFORE full-on
war breaks out.


23 posted on 03/13/2014 9:01:50 PM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: call meVeronica

“they had a list of specific customers they were asking about.”

NSA at its best!

And the specific customers were doing nothing wrong. But they just wanted to talk to (ie. intimidate) them.


24 posted on 03/13/2014 9:09:42 PM PDT by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a classical Christian approach to homeschool])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Somewhere, there are instructions for making a gun out of a shovel. I sometimes like to wonder how many federal heads exploded when they first saw that?

Oh, look, I found it but the pictures won’t show. http://www.northeastshooters.com/vbulletin/threads/179192-DIY-Shovel-AK-photo-tsunami-warning!


25 posted on 03/13/2014 9:20:47 PM PDT by Ellendra ("Laws were most numerous when the Commonwealth was most corrupt." -Tacitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

You got it right. The headline on this is totally bogus.


26 posted on 03/13/2014 9:42:44 PM PDT by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
An 80% lower is a hunk of metal that is worked to be almost an AR-15. It requires a bit more work and is considered a homemade firearm which means it can never be sold, only willed. Short but way more accurate than that blurb.

Yet still not accurate. ;)

27 posted on 03/13/2014 10:58:34 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

As I’ve read/heard it it, you can sell it, but you have to serialize it at that time and then run it through the 4473/DROS process.

80%’s sales will probably go through the roof here. I think most of the sellers also sell templates for easy machining out of the remaining metal and with the Jan 1st rules for long gun registry with purchase it’s probably the last best way in CA to have an off record LBR. Prior to this you went through DROS/BG Check process, but they didn’t record the type of long gun (just rifle or shotgun IIRC)


28 posted on 03/13/2014 11:28:36 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
The solid fire-control cavity is built first and the rest of the 80% casting is made around this “core” specifically so that their product at no time could be considered to be a firearm.

HA! That is genius, and probably why that particular 80% lower pisses them off so much. If the polymer fire control cavity is made first with a different color polymer the final casting can probably be subsequently cored out with merely something like a dremel tool or a drill and fine files. The operator merely needs to stop at the show-through of color from the outer casting and fine work that so the subsequently installed parts work smoothly. Damn, now I want to get one just to check it out!

29 posted on 03/13/2014 11:43:40 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Exactly.


30 posted on 03/14/2014 12:07:09 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

That’s it in a nutshell.


31 posted on 03/14/2014 12:16:14 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

This is some serious Sh!t.


32 posted on 03/14/2014 12:30:28 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

ATF visited me after registering my LLC as a machine shop. They “heard” I was making guns. I never have and it is quite ironic they showed up a few days after.

Besides the legal requirement to keep records of firearms sales, why don’t these guys shred their records? There is no law I know of requiring me to keep records of my customers. Fill the order, then destroy the record and shipping address.


33 posted on 03/14/2014 1:34:04 AM PDT by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Organic Panic

Ref “impeachment: “....have the Senate decide on Removal.”.....

“Houston, we have a problem”


34 posted on 03/14/2014 4:12:45 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

2nd ping thanks for posting


35 posted on 03/14/2014 4:52:24 AM PDT by maine yankee (I got my Governor at 'Marden's')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
the FEDS will simply look at their credit card transaction for certain dollar amounts through compliant banks
36 posted on 03/14/2014 4:54:29 AM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
They don’t give a damn about the receivers. They want the names for the database they are building in anticipation of the time when some of the American people say “enough”. The Feds are pressuring the states to hand over their CCDW lists. Which they have no authority to ask for. Instructor in my CCDW class said they had been trying to get the names from Kentucky. They are expecting some serious dissent and they are preparing to come down on the “non-compliant” citizens when it happens. This is not going to end well.

Yep - all the "promises" that applications for purchase aren't saved/entered into databases are worth the words that come out of Obama's mouth - they are relentless and we wait for the shears....

37 posted on 03/14/2014 5:32:17 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: trebb
they are relentless and we wait for the shears....

Everybody needs to start growing steel wool.

38 posted on 03/14/2014 5:37:53 AM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Sounds like they did not get a “determination letter” from the BATF before they started selling them. Big mistake. Several other manufacturers sell their own 80% lower with a copy of the letter from the BATF specifically saying that this 80% lower has been determined by the BATF to be a non-gun. I have read from the manufacturers that they often have to change some small item on their 80% receiver in order what they sell in order to get that letter.

It looks like the company did not bother to have the lower reviewed. They decided themselves that it was no different from other 80% lowers. That is a pretty weak from a legal standpoint. I wish them luck, but several other 80% lower manufacturers have been put out of business by the BATF and I expect no different here. Just the cost of keeping out of jail breaks most of them that have been raided.


39 posted on 03/14/2014 5:43:32 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O

http://polymer80.com/

just machine out all the red parts and it’s a polymer 100.


40 posted on 03/14/2014 5:46:40 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

A great many people buy them over the Internet.


41 posted on 03/14/2014 2:21:02 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

“If someone is so fearful that, that they’re going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, makes me very nervous that these people have these weapons at all!”

Rep. Henry Waxman


42 posted on 03/14/2014 2:47:17 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Haven't you lost enough freedoms? Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson