Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Crime Stoppers Chief Eats the Evidence
NBC ^ | 3/14/14

Posted on 03/15/2014 4:35:33 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

The executive director of Miami-Dade Crime Stoppers is facing up to two weeks in jail on a contempt of court charge for stuffing an anonymous tip in his mouth instead of handing it over to a judge Friday.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: crime; liars; privacy; trust
There you go.
1 posted on 03/15/2014 4:35:34 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

He did good. I don’t know what the crime was, but too many judges are bought off these days. Too good a chance that they’d find Mr. Anonymous floating in the river.


2 posted on 03/15/2014 4:43:21 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“He did good.”

I think so too. He was true to his word to those who would give tips.


3 posted on 03/15/2014 4:45:53 AM PDT by beef (Who Killed Kennewick Man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

“He did good.”

Yes he did. He is a good boy.

Got the get paid. Got to get paid.


4 posted on 03/15/2014 4:49:21 AM PDT by FAA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Candy wrappers come out of my dog the same way they went in.
Is this guy sitting on a bucket in jail?


5 posted on 03/15/2014 4:59:52 AM PDT by Average Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Average Al

Pretty sure this evidence would count as “tainted” after a trip thru the large intestine.


6 posted on 03/15/2014 5:12:30 AM PDT by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: beef

Bingo! When the court is contempible, the rational response is contempt. This applies to Congress as well.


7 posted on 03/15/2014 5:36:55 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (You can have a free country or government schools. Choose one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

There is so much to be defiant towards nowadays. It’s cool and admirable .


8 posted on 03/15/2014 5:46:34 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

“Bingo! When the court is contempible, the rational response is contempt. This applies to Congress as well.”
********************
I agree, we are heading down a slippery slope to disaster.


9 posted on 03/15/2014 5:59:29 AM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

“...to turn a blind eye to a flagrant refusal to honor a court order, and give more value to an individual’s opinion on what is right..”

No your honor...he was honoring a promise.


10 posted on 03/15/2014 6:27:58 AM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Why would he even bring it into the courtroom then?


11 posted on 03/15/2014 6:30:07 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I could see that greasy attorney, or the judge being bought off by some drug cartel and giving the name of the tipster.

Even if they aren’t corrupt, they could likely be taught to sing out the name while having their fingernails ripped out.

The judge is a moron for not thinking about that.


12 posted on 03/15/2014 6:39:46 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jabba the Nutt

to quote my brother during one of his many divorce proceedings..

“I have nothing but contempt for this court”...


13 posted on 03/15/2014 7:05:01 AM PDT by joe fonebone (a socialist is just a juvenile communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

Did you consider the reason for the Judge’s ruling? What if this is false information. What if it is completely made up for the benefit of CrimeStoppers? I have witnessed this happen many times with real police and other organizations.
There is money involved and thus it has the possibility of corruption from the start. If this person is a paid employee of any org. he should be fired for disregarding the Court Order. When you make up information to “make your own Probable Cause” you are part of the problem.
That said, Defense lawyers are usually scum so they could be practicing witness intimidation in a “roundabout” manner.


14 posted on 03/15/2014 8:45:49 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

“Did you consider the reason for the Judge’s ruling? What if this is false information. What if it is completely made up for the benefit of CrimeStoppers?”

Did you consider that the only way to know for sure would be to put the formally anonymous tipster on the witness stand?

A piece of paper would prove nothing, and the only possible reason the judge/attorney could need to see it is to put the person on the stand.

Nobody could be convicted based solely on the tip, the evidence would have to prove guilt.


15 posted on 03/15/2014 9:29:22 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

You answered my question with your own. If this “alleged” tip is false it could still lead to the probable cause to gather other evidence. You are correct that the person would not have to testify. Convictions are not the same as arrests. It is still very costly to fight charges.
Again, follow the money. If this person is paid, as are most Crimestoppers Units, who is he/she to decide what they turn over. This is the same as some recent cases where Lab Directors have falsified evidence and thousands of cases are overturned. Should those Lab people make a rule they don’t have to give information to a Judge?


16 posted on 03/15/2014 10:00:37 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

If the person is never going to have to testify, what is the reason to see their name on the note?

No, they didn’t need to see it.


17 posted on 03/15/2014 10:07:40 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
Again, follow the money. If this person is paid, as are most Crimestoppers Units, who is he/she to decide what they turn over.

Paid our not, as I understand it there is a contract between the person giving the information and Crimestoppes that the name of the informant will be withheld.

If those contracts are illegal, it should be established in a court of law.

18 posted on 03/15/2014 10:11:53 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Makes no sense. Police can’t keep information confidential. It is called Discovery(Brady v. Md). Why should a paid clerk be able to keep criminal information confidential but a duly appointed law Enforcement Officer can’t?
Secondly, the Judge wanted to see the information IN CAMERA. That means only the Judge sees it. Not the Defense Attorney. Why would this person Not want to show it to the Judge. Probably made up. Fraudulent. It is called Official Misconduct. Much more criminal than Contempt.


19 posted on 03/15/2014 11:15:50 AM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
Why should a paid clerk be able to keep criminal information confidential but a duly appointed law Enforcement Officer can’t?

Because of the contract with the informant.

20 posted on 03/15/2014 1:07:27 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

There is no contract. Contract can not contain provisions that are against the law. Since it is law that a Defendant must be provided ALL discovery, one can’t hide the Discovery behind a Crimestoppers Logo.
I have seen the Crimestoppers logs in many cases. They are redacted to ID #s. However, when something is suspicious the Court can look into the item requested.
Crimestoppers is usually funded by the Gvo’t and/or is part of a Gov’t Agency itself. They can’t hide the information. Just because you want it to be so, doesn’t make it that way.


21 posted on 03/15/2014 3:13:31 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DrDude

Here is the link for this org.
http://www.crimestoppersmiami.com/who-we-are

These people are paid employees. Each Department lends one Officer to the program. It is funded by the Attorney General’s Office in the State of Florida. It is just like I thought. They collect and distribute money. They apparently got caught making up some info and paying off a strawman. It happens everywhere and Miami is as crooked as it gets.


22 posted on 03/15/2014 3:23:37 PM PDT by DrDude (Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DrDude
Since it is law that a Defendant must be provided ALL discovery, one can’t hide the Discovery behind a Crimestoppers Logo.

If that's the case, and it sounds like it may be here, none of the informants information can be used, and the charges should be withdrawn or the case thrown out by the judge.

As the reporting on this reads, there is a contract with the informant. That's why the paer was swallowed. Just because you don't want it to be a contract doesn't make it so.

23 posted on 03/15/2014 5:09:09 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Over production, one of the top 5 worries for the American Farmer every year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson