[soycd]

>When we are forced to pay for other peoples birth control, forced to subsidize women who have out of wedlock children those are not just social but fiscal issues.

Yes, and if there had to be a choice, the safest, less expensive and less damaging to society would be preventing the birth of unwanted kids and stopping the welfare cycle.

[digger48]

Wouldn’t it be even safer, cheaper and less damaging to our society if young, unwed women could see the advantage to keeping their knees together?

[itsahoot]

and less damaging to society would be preventing the conception birth of unwanted kids and stopping the welfare cycle.

Fixed it for you.