Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moscow Signals It Will Annex Crimea Quickly
Wall Street Journal ^ | 03/17/2014 | Olga Razumovskaya

Posted on 03/17/2014 5:11:57 AM PDT by goldstategop

Russia gave its clearest signal yet Monday that it plans to move fast to annex Crimea, defying U.S. and European threats of sanctions a day after a referendum in the breakaway Ukrainian region to secede passed handily.

The Moscow-backed leadership of Crimea wasted no time in formally asking to join Russia following the hastily called referendum in which 97% of voters supported becoming part of Russia.

"We will take care of our part quickly, quickly and responsibly," Sergei Naryshkin, speaker of the lower house of Russia's parliament, told reporters in response to the Crimean parliamentary vote, according to local news agencies.

Mr. Naryshkin's comments came shortly after officials announced that Russian President Vladimir Putin will address a joint session of parliament Tuesday on the issue.

The Kremlin didn't immediately specify what Mr. Putin's message would be, but the official ITAR-Tass news agency said the address would cover "accepting Crimea into the Russian Federation."

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: crimea; crimeanaccession; olgarazumovskaya; putin; russia; ukraine; west; wsj
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: goldstategop

Kind of like if the Northeast and the Westcoast became the socialist states of America...we would probably be better off.


41 posted on 03/17/2014 7:03:40 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Actually, the choices were “join Russia” and “more autonomy within Ukraine”. Still, reading the 36% staying home as the “No, go back to the status quo ante” vote, gives .64*95.5% = 61.1% in favor of joining Russia (and 3.9% in favor of more autonomy within Ukraine).

61.1% secession votes in Scotland, the Veneto or Quebec will be seen as landslides if they happen, and if the Catalans vote 61.1% in favor of leaving Spain, Madrid will be hard pressed to say “no” the Spanish Constitution notwithstanding.


42 posted on 03/17/2014 7:05:52 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"What is Obama’s counter?"

---------------------------------->

Rolling over...

...like a submissive dog.

43 posted on 03/17/2014 7:07:08 AM PDT by hummingbird (Mark Levin and Article 5. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
No room for 'Nyet' in Ukraine's Crimea vote to join Russia.
44 posted on 03/17/2014 7:13:26 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Exactly.


45 posted on 03/17/2014 7:15:39 AM PDT by MarMema ("If Americans really wanted Obamacare, you wouldn't need a law to make them buy it." Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
61.1% secession votes in Scotland, the Veneto or Quebec will be seen as landslides if they happen, and if the Catalans vote 61.1% in favor of leaving Spain, Madrid will be hard pressed to say “no” the Spanish Constitution notwithstanding.

From your lips to God's ear...

46 posted on 03/17/2014 7:26:49 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

What if:

California split into two States. And what if the southern state had a preponderance of Hispanics. And what if some event caused them to demand separation from the USA. And what if a referendum resulted in which they voted overwhelming to either separate from the USA as a nation, or become a state of Mexico.

Ditto, Arizona and New Mexico.

Sound far fetched?? Don’t discount it. We live in strange times.


47 posted on 03/17/2014 7:29:07 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456
.....100% of 59 districts in Philly voted for Obama....

And also vice versa, except a couple that went 100%+. But not to worry, the software is being patched and next time, the opposition candidate, whomsoever that might be, will receive at least 1 vote in each of those districts. Maybe 2.

That will look a whole lot better. But why always pick on Philly? In Baltimore, the same voters have been on the rolls since 1789.

48 posted on 03/17/2014 7:32:09 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ( The Republican Party is in Hospice Care. Hold all contributions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
McFrog, in jest you come close to a bullseye, Buckeye.

In a recent election, Ed Rendell illegally registered about 100,000 legal aliens, mostly Russians and Albanians, and they voted. He got caught red-handed (NB pun) but the PA Courts, such as they are, decided that just this once, they would let it slide, since Team Rendell, they said, woulda won anyway.

49 posted on 03/17/2014 7:35:46 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ( The Republican Party is in Hospice Care. Hold all contributions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
When will mexico force a referendum on parts of Texas, Kalifornia and Arizona and then break them off to be annexed?

If that happened remaining Texas would become deep red.

50 posted on 03/17/2014 7:36:18 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
.....the residents of Baja had voted in 90%+ numbers to join the United States....

Dunno about the 90%, but the citizens of Baja have often expressed a desire and actually formed movements to join American California. The Mexicans punished them by denying them Mexican statehood for many decades. Then, mot too long ago when they finally let'em in, they broke up Baja, making it two states.

Of course, there are not a hell of a lot of people in Baja, so a real secessionary revolt wasn't really feasible.

51 posted on 03/17/2014 7:40:53 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk ( The Republican Party is in Hospice Care. Hold all contributions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
"When will mexico force a referendum on parts of Texas, Kalifornia and Arizona and then break them off to be annexed?"

--------------------------------------------------->

My wish (as a Texan):

Texas, New Mexico and Arizona unite and form a Federation of their own - not American and not Mexican.

New Mexico and Arizona will remain a Federation and maybe annex willing adjacent states - Nevada, Utah, Colorado - who want to tell US "we.are.out.of.here".

Texas becomes its own country.

Kalifornia....well...I guess we can figure out that Kalifornia will embrace its takeover from Mexico from the start---willingly embracing a Mexican takeover....like a submissive dog...

...excepting for Californian Freepers who may separate out and form their own Federation at the best locale of California - and there are many beautiful places in California - take one of them you beautiful California Freepers!

52 posted on 03/17/2014 7:56:53 AM PDT by hummingbird (Mark Levin and Article 5. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

And perhaps take meaningful action.


53 posted on 03/17/2014 8:02:14 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Hubris and denial overwhelm Western Civilization. Nemesis and tragedy always follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: hummingbird
Recent news from California...


54 posted on 03/17/2014 8:10:51 AM PDT by mac_truck ( Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

So can we expect a vote next week in Chechnya on whether they wish to remain as part of Russia?


55 posted on 03/17/2014 8:13:43 AM PDT by Hoodat (Democrats - Opposing Equal Protection since 1828)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Potential things the US could have done (or still could do): 1. Immediately begin sending C-17s into Kiev

Jeff, with great respect, we have no way to ascertain the situation on the ground with respect to the sentiments of the Ukraine's population.

They could be Poles awaiting the Wehrmacht, but they equally well could be Austrians awaiting the great day of unification.

There is no reliable way to know, and since there isn't, exposing our guys to a situation where they are helping a minority, perhaps a tiny minority, who are well-connected to CNNCBSNBCABC and the IMF-Soros-EU conglomerate just doesn't seem to me like good policymaking.

56 posted on 03/17/2014 8:24:16 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
Well, how about that Tim Draper...a man with a vision./s

On this St. Patrick's Day, it reminds me of the call for "26 + 6=1"

(26 counties in Ireland + 6 counties in Northern Ireland = a true consolidated Ireland.

Re: Russia/Crimea/Ukraine:

"I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" - (from movie Zoolander)

57 posted on 03/17/2014 9:01:42 AM PDT by hummingbird (Mark Levin and Article 5. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

No problem, Jim. But in Kiev and inthe western and northern provinces of the country, we do know.

They want no part of Russia and have their own nation, their own constitution...and their own memories of Stalins stavation campaigns aginats the grandparents. They have been recommedned several times for joining NATO, and we should have made that happen before now, as we did for Poland and others. THeir troops have fought with our own in the Mid East.

Crimea...and the other two provinces that are predominantly ehtnic Russian...what ou say is true. But not the rest of the country.


58 posted on 03/17/2014 10:41:53 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lololo

No, because Russia invaded their nation and parsed off one of their provinces and is set, and emboldened to do more.

That’s why.


59 posted on 03/17/2014 10:42:54 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Like it was during the time of Catherine the Great. (late 18th century).
60 posted on 03/17/2014 11:42:51 AM PDT by prof.h.mandingo (Buck v. Bell (1927) An idea whose time has come (for extreme liberalism))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson