1 posted on
03/19/2014 12:02:42 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: Toddsterpatriot; Mase; expat_panama
2 posted on
03/19/2014 12:04:26 PM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Bailouts was one of the chief reasons for the Tea Party
3 posted on
03/19/2014 12:06:54 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans!)
To: 1rudeboy
It is impossible to reason with stupid and ignorant people. And ‘klugman’ is in a league all by himself.
4 posted on
03/19/2014 12:23:03 PM PDT by
mulligan
(I)
To: 1rudeboy
Krugman is an unabashed spin-meister for the Democratic party. While a renowned economist, his approach to writing at the NYT is much more as an advocate for the Democratic party and a presenter of half or partial truths, than an objective commentator or things economic.
5 posted on
03/19/2014 12:43:24 PM PDT by
Robert357
(D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
To: 1rudeboy
Some libs are liars...some are just ignorant....and of course, many are both. Krugman falls into the last category. He’s not nearly as smart as he thinks he is, and he also likes to lie.
To: 1rudeboy
Being both a Nobel laureate and an extreme leftist means that Krugman’s immune to criticism and can say anything. It’s kind of like having a community chest “get out of ridicule’ card.
12 posted on
03/19/2014 1:32:05 PM PDT by
expat_panama
(Arguing with those who have renounced reason is like giving medicine to the dead. --Thomas Paine)
To: 1rudeboy
Even most leftists admit krugman is stupid.
To: 1rudeboy
The little weasel, Paul Krugman is nothing more than a political who who has become rich selling himself to the highest bidder.
In 1999 Paul Krugman was paid $50,000 by Enron as a consultant on its “advisory board,” and that same year he wrote a glowing article about Enron for Fortune magazine. Enron collapsed in 2001.
16 posted on
03/19/2014 3:13:53 PM PDT by
Baynative
(Got bulbs? Check my profile page.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson