.
Posted on 03/21/2014 8:30:00 PM PDT by mtrott
As aircraft and ships continued to search for debris which might be that of the missing flight MH370 on Friday a Malaysian woman on a flight across the Indian Ocean claimed to have seen an aircraft in the water near the Andaman Islands on the day the jet disappeared.
The Kuala Lumpur wife was so convinced about what she saw at 2.30pm on March 8, several hours after MH370 vanished, that she filed an official report with police that very day - a full five days before the search for the plane was expanded to the area around the Andaman Islands.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Anyway to get hold of the police report?
And we beg to differ. Log it.
How far away are the island for Australia?
From the area where the fisherman was?
From the island where the people heard/saw it fly over?
Who’s in charge? Who’s on first?
Wasn't this a night flight??? Isn't it dark outside in the Malaca Straits at 2:30pm??? If it is then how do you see a plane floating in the water in the dark???
.
Read the article. “The Kuala Lumpur wife was so convinced about what she saw at 2.30pm on March 8, several hours after MH370 vanished”
1. The Andaman islands are relatively close to Malasia. The MH370 would have had to fly in circles for several hours to end up at that location.
2. If this woman is right then the satellite tracking data is wrong. I pick the tracking data.
This plane went down either north of Pakistan or west of Australia. Since as far as we know this aircraft was not equipped with a Star Trek standard cloaking device that would be required to avoid radar surveillance on the Northern route I vote for the far off the West coast of Australia scenario.
Oops. Make that Malaysia.
“The walrus was Paul.”
All these people are wrong. It's at the bottom of Lake Nokomis about two blocks from where I live.
Yeah, I understand what you are saying. But, just as I question the claim that the plane ever went up to 45,000 feet(because apparently the radar involved was not “altitude” sensing), I also am not convinced about the seven hour flight time either. But I concede that could be the case.
Now, I suppose it could also be possible that if the plane had made a “Sully” style landing near the Andamans, it could have floated for hours and emitted the ping to the satellite. This woman could have seen the plane partially submerged.
Also, the area she says she saw the plane IS in the arc they have been portraying as to where the plane could be.
She wasn’t convinced enough to defy her government and the airlines while for 7 days they were looking for it in the South China Sea.
She didn’t speak up and the police report she filed is probably backdated and falsified like everything else Malaysians have done here.
AND it was dark outside — making it impossible to see a plane in the water especially at 35,000 feet.
But by all means they should look everywhere after all the Malaysians have such credibility now.
I’m waiting for the story where it is found in the Bermuda Triangle.
Or, like my fav cover of National Enquirer, found on the dark side of the moon.
Color me awestruck skeptical.
Why do you keep saying it was dark? The article clearly states her flight was later in the afternoon of March 8.
Also:
“The Kuala Lumpur wife was so convinced about what she saw at 2.30pm on March 8, several hours after MH370 vanished, that she filed an official report with police that very day” Why are you saying she waited for seven days?
Bored? Computer on? You can spot it yourself! http://www.tomnod.com/
(Pakistan not on the list of sat. photos tho ;-) )
The damn thing is probably still at the end of the taxi way, waiting for clearance to take off.
The sun is out at 2:30.pm.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.