I think this is more appropriate for scale:
Posted on 03/26/2014 4:09:08 AM PDT by mgist
I think this is more appropriate for scale:
---–----------
Michelle Obama afraid of the Big Bad Wolf, i.e. media attention
Dylan Byers Politico Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:16 CDT
© Jacquelyn Martin/Associated Press
A quick look at how the sausage get made, or doesn't
On Tuesday night, The New York Times reported that no reporters would be traveling with First Lady Michelle Obama to China, and that she would be giving no interviews while there. Nicholas Kristof, the Times columnist, called the First Lady's decision "a mistake," and said it "signals weakness or fear of coverage." Several conservative outlets picked up the Times report, including the influential Drudge Report, which linked to a Weekly Standard article about it.
Shortly after noon on Wednesday, I reached out to the First Lady's office to inquire about the decision. A spokesperson for the First Lady responded to my inquiry but declared the response "off the record," meaning I wasn't allowed to use the information therein. When I told the spokesperson that I needed a response I could use, the spokesperson replied with another off-the-record statement regarding the First Lady's trip.
The spokesperson then wrote, "If you need something attributable, you can take this on background from a White House official..."
The statement that followed did not address my original inquiry. Instead, it offered a formulaic explanation about "the power and importance of education" and "reaching people," followed by an explanation that the First Lady would participate in open press events and take questions online and in forums.
By now it was 5 p.m. ET, nearly five hours after my initial inquiry. When I told the spokesperson that I did not see why the quote needed to be anonymous and attributed to "a White House official," the spokesperson said if I needed something on the record I could refer to the First Lady's travel guidance and a transcript of a press call regarding the trip. These documents did not contain an answer to my question regarding why no reporters would be traveling with the First Lady.
Now, I'll leave frustration over Michelle Obama's trip to The New York Times, Nick Krisfof, The Weekly Standard and Drudge Report (a motley crew right there). What I want to know -- and what I've wanted to know since last October -- is why the spokesperson in the First Lady's office didn't want to give me a name I could put on a harmless, formulaic quote?
“That never happened, he suggests, because Michelle decided to play it safe — having been burned by the intense criticism she received on the campaign trail when she said, “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I’m really proud of my country.”
There is a soft underbelly after all....
suspected and now confirmed. The criticism DOES reach the inner sanctum.
Good,,,very very good.
The parasitic Obama's gargantuan Entitlement Disease keeps eating away at America's greatness.
Moocher's pricey China trip was "sold" to Americans as a "non-political" visit....... to chat up education.
But all of her appearances and inane remarks were connivingly structured for one purpose: to set herself up as a future candidate....and doing it on our dime.
MISSION CREEP The final explanation was that the trip and the tripe she was pedaling was "soft diplomacy" --to "ease tensions" between the US and China. Come again? Who elected this self-serving creep? Who gave her diplomat credentials?
Seems Obama is still bribing her after the Mandela Memorial blond fiasco. Moocher got the $12,000 Herrara dress, a state dinner to hostess, and the trip to China to burnish her credentials as a candidate .....so far.
I just hope Valerie Jarett doesn't get carpel tunnel syndrome wire-transferring funds offshore for campaign expenses.
” “The First Lady is laser-focused on moving the needle wherever and whenever possible.”
AHA! Now we know where the laser is!
Bump to get graphics later
^^^THIS^^^ LOL!
See how it's really our fault, not hers?
First thing I thought when I read the headline.
My opinion? (not that you asked.....:-) )
I don't know this for a fact, but can guess that the WH has entire legions of people dedicated to comportment, style, etiquette, modes of address, and protocol. There are legions more who would help, just to have the access to the office.
The fact that Moochelle hasn't taken advantage of any of this, speaks loudly for her character.
This reads like an article in The Onion.
Poor, poor, pitiful East Wing staffers! I really do feel sorry for them.
The clothes have no empress.
“Paging Jerry Springer!”
——The clothes have no empress.-—
Superb Bon Mot
In the days of Louis XV and Louis XVI, there were in Paris Salons where people gathered to talk and discuss the issues of the day. Most prized by the hostesses were those guests that could provide exceptional Bon Mots.
Today, we gather in Jim Robinson’s Salon to read your Bon Mot.
During the early years, the MSM would fawn all over her for some of those goshawful outfits. MSM called her trendy and trendsetter and fashionable.
Apparently, she read her own press clippings and thought she was a fashion setter.
However, someone on the inside got the message that those goshawful outfits were goshawful. She seems to have improved her public persona and appearance.
Great. It’s like everyone is in high school. I bet the West Wing is even more screwed up.
I can't say I'd always know the right way to behave in all these formal circumstances, but if I were Prez I'd hire a bunch of Emily Posts to give step-by-step directions.
I’m watching his show now. I can see it.
Commie 2014
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.