[ansel12]

So another libertarian Paul backer who is anti-Palin.

[2ndDivisionVet]

The two almost always go together. Then there's the misogynists, the “screechy voice” objectors, the “she's already been destroyed by the media” types and the ones who still claim she's an idiot.

[PaulCruz2016]

So another libertarian Paul backer who is anti-Palin.

Do you realize how goofy you sound? I did not say one single, solitary negative word about Palin herself in my post, only her more rabid-and-vocal supporters online. How in the world does that make me "anti-Palin"?

Thanks for proving the underlying point, however.

[Hugin]

Well, here’s a pro-Paul libertarian who is also pro-Palin. I’ve said before I would vote for her, but she needs to announce early and run a serious campaign. Otherwise I’ll vote for Rand because he seems to be doing exactly that, or someone else.

That said, Sarah did us a real disservice last time around. I take her at her word that she was seriously considering running but decided not to do so, but none the less it helped Romney. I hope she realizes it was a mistake. Now some folks around here are so sensitive about any criticism of Palin (far more than I expect she would be) that I’ve gotten nasty remarks just for that mild criticism.