Posted on 03/31/2014 4:42:56 PM PDT by Star Traveler
This week, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is releasing its latest report, the “Working Group II Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report.” Like its past reports, this one predicts apocalyptic consequences if mankind fails to give the UN the power to tax and regulate fossil fuels and subsidize and mandate the use of alternative fuels. But happily, an international group of scientists I have been privileged to work with has conducted an independent review of IPCC’s past and new reports, along with the climate science they deliberately exclude or misrepresent.
Our group, called the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC), was founded in 2003 by a distinguished atmospheric physicist, S. Fred Singer, and has produced five hefty reports to date, the latest being released today (March 31).
So how do the IPCC and NIPCC reports differ? The final draft of the IPCC’s Summary for Policymakers identifies eight “reasons for concern” which media reports say will remain the focus of the final report. The NIPCC reports address each point too, also summarizing their authors’ positions in Summaries for Policymakers. This provides a convenient way to compare and contrast the reports’ findings.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
The IPCC is really the Chicken Little UN Hegemoniacs Committee (CLUNHC).
Rule 2: Shut it down.
Rule 3. Move the UN outta NYC and into Harare, Zimbabwe.
Thanks for the post.
I should say ... so everyone will know my position ... that I’m a FIRM BELIEVER in Global Warming, Global Cooling and Climate Change - as I think they are absolutely beyond any doubt.
It’s only the “Anthropogenic Global Warming” that I think has no science backing it and is only “political advocacy”.
Last gasp of global warning hucksters. I have seen so many people in the past few years who used to believe this bs, that now think that this is the leftist plot that it has truly become.
You bet! I was interested in this article because it’s the first time I’ve seen the NIPCC.
The Hide The Decline-ers are losing their monopoly control of the debate.
I created my own “climate model” with numbers I pulled out of my - - -. It gives me results that correlate precisely with the - - - - numbers in my model.
I will gladly sell my climate model to the UN for $45 billion, or 2 for $40 billion. Free shipping and handling.
bump
. The leftist plot it always was
The media merchants of fear and hysteria never run out of inventory. But I ain’t buying!
IPCC - Internationally Political Correct Climatists
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.