Posted on 04/10/2014 2:56:30 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
If you suspect that politics might have played a role in the Justice Department bringing charges against conservative filmmaker Dinesh DSouza, consider the financial support to Barack Obama from a key DOJ lawyer in the U.S. Attorneys office that filed the charges.
Each U.S. Attorneys office has a lone District Election Officer (DEO). The DEO is the singular point person in each U.S. Attorney office for any matter related to an election or campaign finance. The U.S. Attorneys office in the Southern District of New York is the office which brought the campaign finance charges against DSouza.
David Kennedy is the designated District Election Officer in the U.S. Attorneys office in the Southern District of New York. According to Federal Election Commission records, Kennedy is also a campaign contributor to Barack Obama as well as to John Kerry. Kennedy has also contributed to state campaigns, including New York Democrat Assemblyman Jeffrey Dinowitz.
DSouzas case is called a conduit case. The Justice Department alleges that he provided funds to other people to contribute to a candidate for United States Senate, thereby avoiding the maximum contribution limits.
DSouzas film 2016 portrays Barack Obama as a product of a third world hostility toward Western colonialism and having an fierce aversion to American values of individual liberty, self-reliance and the rule of law. It is the 4th highest grossing documentary of all time.
~snip~
DEOs at the Justice Department received specific training on how to search public records and look for conduit cases. DEOs were trained by lawyers from the DOJ Public Integrity Section how to use public FEC files to look for data patterns and information which may betray a possible conduit case. David Kennedy has been the DEO for the Southern District of New York at least since 2010.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Holder: “You don’t want to go there buddy”.
I am an African American and questioning me about anything I do, say or decide is nothing but racism from a white cracker who hates me because I’m black.
Have they no shame, no shame at all?
Nope, the media hasn’t even a tiny smidgen of shame.
This is so unexpected. A stunning revelation.
There is NO constitutional warrant for the POLITICAL CENSORSHIP euphemistically called “Campaign Finance Reform.”
D’Souza should judge-shop, then ask for summary dismissal with prejudice because of this revelation.
Of COURSE the media has shame.
They are ashamed of America.
They are ashamed of capitalism.
They are ashamed they could not bring down Reagan.
They are ashamed they could not cinch the election for Algore.
They have LOTS of shame.
No, the media has no shame, they are blatant accomplices. Our media is one of the biggest enemies this country has and eventually it will destroy itself, it’s already well on the way. They think they’re so smart, but only the dumbest of the dumb can not see what is heading toward them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.